Successful Treatment of Female Pattern Hair Loss With Injection of Nanofat With and Without Platelet-Rich Plasma
NCT ID: NCT07096323
Last Updated: 2025-07-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-12-01
2023-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective: To compare efficacy of nanofat alone and nanofat combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of female-pattern hair loss.
Methods: This study is a randomized controlled prospective intervention. Forty patients with mild to moderate FPHL were selected and randomly allocated into two groups (A and B). Both groups received a single session of nanofat scalp injection. Nanofat was prepared from lipoaspirates by mechanical agitation of adipose tissue, and was mixed with PRP for patients allocated in group B.
Results: Nanofat alone and combined with PRP promoted hair regrowth. However, the adjunctive use of PRP with nanofat yielded a statistically significant enhancement in terminal hair thickness (P \<0.001) and count (P \<0.001) compared with nanofat alone. Mean satisfaction score was 3 out of 5 at 24 weeks post-injection, with no significant difference between the two treatment groups (P= 0.937). The side effects were mild and well-tolerated.
Conclusion: Both nanofat, alone and in combination with PRP, improved hair thickness and count in patients with FPHL. The combination with PRP demonstrated a statistically significant improvement compared with nanofat alone.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison Between Platelet Rich Plasma and Nanofat as an Adjuvant Therapy in HairTransplantation
NCT07287579
Adipose Derived Stem Cells Versus Platelet Rich Plasma on Follicular Unit Extraction
NCT03388840
Efficacy and Safety of Platelet-Rich Plasma as an Intraoperative Holding Solution in Hair Transplantation
NCT06849674
Efficacy of Stromal Vascular Fraction Versus Platelet Rich Plasma in Treatment of Androgenitic Alopecia
NCT06558565
Condensed Nanofat Grafting for Treatment of Androgenetic Alopecia
NCT03506503
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Following approval from the research ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University (FMASU MS 167/2023), written informed consent was obtained from each patient after providing information regarding procedural steps and potential side effects or complications.
The study population comprised females aged 18-50 years with moderate to severe FPHL, classified as Sinclair grades 3-4. Exclusion criteria included age \< 18 years and \>50 years, chronic telogen effluvium, use of topical or systemic FPHL treatments in the preceding 6 months, infection at the treatment site or elsewhere, diabetes, hemorrhagic disorders, anticoagulant therapy, pregnancy or lactation, personal or family history of malignancy, immunosuppression or lidocaine allergy.
The clinical diagnosis of FPHL was confirmed according to Rakowska et al., 2009 trichoscopic criteria for diagnosis of FPHL. FPHL is diagnosed by the presence of two major criteria or one major and two minor criteria.
Digital photography was documented at a point 10 cm directly above the midpoint of the glabella at the initial visit and at all subsequent visits. Patients were evaluated clinically and trichoscopically at baseline, then at 12 and 24 weeks after treatment.
Patients were divided into two groups (20 patients each) using simple (computer-generated) randomization. Group A: Nanofat was prepared and injected intradermally into the frontoparietal scalp. Group B: Nanofat was prepared, then mixed with PRP, and injected as in group A.
A single session was performed for patients in both groups. Nanofat Preparation: Fat was collected from either the lower abdomen or lateral upper thigh. A blunt-tipped infiltration cannula (Luer Lock Mercedes Gold Liposuction Cannula 4mm x 30 cm, Pakistan) was used for injection of Klein solution for tumescent anesthesia. Liposuction cannula was then used, connected to a 50 ml syringe mounted with a stopper to generate negative pressure for liposuction. The lipoaspirate was washed to obtain pure adipose tissue, and mechanical emulsification was achieved by transferring the fat through progressively smaller sieves (2.2 mm, 1.5 mm, 1.2 mm) between two 10 ml syringes connected with Luer-Lock connectors, with at least 30 passages each. The emulsion was not filtered and is referred to as "Nanofat 2.0." PRP preparation: Ten milliliters of venous autologous whole blood were collected with tri-sodium citrate as an anticoagulant, then centrifuged at 112g (1000 rpm) for 10 minutes. The plasma was transferred to new tubes without tri-sodium citrate and centrifuged again at 448g (2000 rpm) for 10 minutes to separate the platelet pellet and platelet-poor plasma (PPP). PRP was kept for mixing it with nanofat while PPP was discarded.
Evaluation of the results The results were evaluated using the following assessments. A- Clinical Evaluation: Clinical photographs of the centrally parted scalp were taken with an iPhone 13 Pro Max camera 12-megapixel camera, ensuring standardization in light, angle, and position. Two blinded investigators evaluated hair fullness and clinical grade using the Sinclair classification and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) scale, ranging from -1 (worsening) to 3 (excellent improvement).
B- Trichoscopic Examination: Trichoscopic images were obtained using a Dermlite DLIII dermoscope (3Gen Inc., California, USA) at 10x magnification. They were analysed using a simple morphometric software (ImageJ, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA) to manually count and measure the mean diameter of terminal hairs.
C- Patient Satisfaction: Patients completed a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire to assess their subjective satisfaction with changes in hair density, hair quality and hair fall at week 24.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
A single session was performed for patients in both groups.
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Nanofat only
20 patients received a single session of scalp injection with nanofat only.
Nanofat only
Fat was collected from either the lower abdomen or lateral upper thigh. A blunt-tipped infiltration cannula (Luer Lock Mercedes Gold Liposuction Cannula 4mm x 30 cm, Pakistan) was used for injection of Klein solution for tumescent anesthesia. Liposuction cannula was then used, connected to a 50 ml syringe mounted with a stopper to generate negative pressure for liposuction. The lipoaspirate was washed to obtain pure adipose tissue, and mechanical emulsification was achieved by transferring the fat through progressively smaller sieves (2.2 mm, 1.5 mm, 1.2 mm) between two 10 ml syringes connected with Luer-Lock connectors, with at least 30 passages each. The emulsion was not filtered and is referred to as "Nanofat 2.0."
Nanofat mixed with PRP
20 patients received a single session of scalp injection with nanofat mixed with PRP.
Nanofat mixed with PRP
Nanofat is prepared the same way as arm 1. PRP was prepared as follows: Ten milliliters of venous autologous whole blood were collected with tri-sodium citrate as an anticoagulant, then centrifuged at 112g (1000 rpm) for 10 minutes. The plasma was transferred to new tubes without tri-sodium citrate and centrifuged again at 448g (2000 rpm) for 10 minutes to separate the platelet pellet and platelet-poor plasma (PPP). PRP was kept for mixing it with nanofat while PPP was discarded
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nanofat only
Fat was collected from either the lower abdomen or lateral upper thigh. A blunt-tipped infiltration cannula (Luer Lock Mercedes Gold Liposuction Cannula 4mm x 30 cm, Pakistan) was used for injection of Klein solution for tumescent anesthesia. Liposuction cannula was then used, connected to a 50 ml syringe mounted with a stopper to generate negative pressure for liposuction. The lipoaspirate was washed to obtain pure adipose tissue, and mechanical emulsification was achieved by transferring the fat through progressively smaller sieves (2.2 mm, 1.5 mm, 1.2 mm) between two 10 ml syringes connected with Luer-Lock connectors, with at least 30 passages each. The emulsion was not filtered and is referred to as "Nanofat 2.0."
Nanofat mixed with PRP
Nanofat is prepared the same way as arm 1. PRP was prepared as follows: Ten milliliters of venous autologous whole blood were collected with tri-sodium citrate as an anticoagulant, then centrifuged at 112g (1000 rpm) for 10 minutes. The plasma was transferred to new tubes without tri-sodium citrate and centrifuged again at 448g (2000 rpm) for 10 minutes to separate the platelet pellet and platelet-poor plasma (PPP). PRP was kept for mixing it with nanofat while PPP was discarded
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Chronic telogen effluvium
* Use of topical or systemic FPHL treatments in the preceding 6 months
* Infection at the treatment site or elsewhere
* Uncontrolled iabetes, hemorrhagic disorders, anticoagulant therapy, pregnancy or lactation
* Personal or family history of malignancy, immunosuppression or lidocaine allergy.
18 Years
50 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ain Shams University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mahy El-Bassiouny
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Ain Shams University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dermatology Department- Ain Shams University
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Does not exist
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
FMASU MS 167/2023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.