Sensor Ankle Brace for Special Operations Rehabilitation

NCT ID: NCT07085416

Last Updated: 2025-10-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-10-16

Study Completion Date

2026-06-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary purpose of this study is to conduct a clinical trial to test a prototype device for feasibility and not health outcomes. To do this, the investigators will evaluate the performance of commercially available inertial measurement unit sensors incorporated into an existing ankle brace ("sXAB") by TayCo Brace, Inc. We will compare the gait metrics calculated from the sensors incorporated into the brace with gold-standard equipment that is used in research and clinical settings to determine whether the sXAB performs adequately in terms of measurement or technical feasibility prior to further clinical evaluation. The sensors in the ankle brace will be validated in the lab, first on healthy subjects walking in standard tennis shoes/sneakers (protocol 1), and secondarily in the lab on healthy subjects wearing combat boots performing walking, running, jumping, and stair climbing (protocol 2). These movements were selected because they simulate key movements performed during operational activities. Protocol 1 will take place first, then aspects of the sXAB will be evaluated and implemented, then protocol 2 will take place. Participants completing protocol 1 are eligible to complete protocol 2. The study includes two cohorts of participants completing different functional tasks. All participants experience both conditions: with an ankle brace and without an ankle brace. Comparisons are made within-subject between brace and no-brace conditions. It is hypothesized that the sensor-enabled ankle brace will measure gait metrics with a high degree of accuracy (within 5%) when compared against the gold-standard lab equipment (i.e., motion capture and research-grade inertial measurement units).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is funded by a grant from the United States Air Force awarded to TayCo Brace, Inc. The required research partner, Indiana University (Principal Investigator Allison Gruber, PhD), holds the subaward. All human subjects activities are taking place at the Indiana University Bloomington (IUB) campus. Potential participants for study protocols 1 and 2 will be recruited from the community and the IUB campus. Paper flyers will be posted on campus and the surrounding commercial areas. Electronic flyers will be posted in the IUB classifies, on the iConnect website, and on social media. Potential participants will either contact the research team to complete the initial screening or respond to the flyer via a QR code that takes them directly to the online version of the screening form. The screening form asks yes/no questions from the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PARQ+) and additional questions about the individuals health history, musculoskeletal injury history, and current physical activity levels. After initial screening to determine eligibility, provisionally eligible participants will come to the laboratory on the IUB campus to complete enrollment and study procedures.

During visit 1 for study protocols 1 and 2, participants will read the informed consent document and, after all questions have been answered, sign the informed consent document if they agree to participate in the study. Next, participants will complete a health history questionnaire which repeats the PARQ+ questions and additional health history questions presented in the initial screening to confirm eligibility. Foot length measurements and additional surveys (i.e., the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IDFAI) and International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ)) will be administered to confirm eligibility in protocol 2 but for protocol 1 the IDFAI and IPAQ will be collected for informative purposes and to help explain variability between participants. If eligibility is confirmed, participants will be enrolled and complete the study procedures. After eligibility is confirmed, all participants for both protocols will also complete the past-year physical activity questionnaire (PYPAQ) and protocol 2 participants will complete a running history questionnaire.

Following the surveys, height and weight will be measured then the dominant limb test and the preferred speed test will be performed. The dominant limb test determines whether the right or left lower limb is the dominant limb by observing which limb participants use to kick a ball. The preferred speed test involves the participant walking or running at or near their reported preferred speed (or 2.9 mph for walking and 4.5 mph for running if preferred speed is unknown). The speed will be blinded to the participant. The researcher will increase or decrease the speed in 0.5-1.0 mph increments until the participant identifies the same speed as their preferred speed three times.

Next, the participant will be prepared for data collection. Participants will be asked to change into form fitting clothing (provided by the laboratory, if needed) and the shoes they prefer to wear during exercise or physical activity (protocol 1), or combat boots provided by the laboratory (protocol 2). Next, reflective markers and the lab's research-grade inertial measurement units (IMUs) will be placed on anatomical landmarks of both feet, lower-legs, thighs, and pelvis, and the sensor-enabled ankle brace ("sXAB") will be secured on the dominant limb, if the first randomized condition is the brace condition. Participants will warm-up by walking on a treadmill before completing each of the brace conditions (brace and no-brace) to acclimate wearing the brace and/or the reflective markers and lab IMUs. Participants will then be asked to complete the movement tests specific to each protocol (protocol 1: standing balance, walking at preferred speed, walking at a standardized speed of 2.9 mph; protocol 2: standing balance, stairs, drop landing, walking at preferred speed, and running at preferred speed) while wearing the sXAB and without wearing the brace ("no brace" condition) as three-dimensional motion capture data, force plate data, IMU data, and data from the sXAB (if worn) are recorded. The order of the bracing conditions will be presented in a random order. The brace will be worn on the dominant limb. Within each brace condition, the standing balance test will be performed first then the remaining movements will be presented in a random order. After the first brace condition is complete, the participant will be prepared to complete the second brace condition then repeat the warm-up, standing balance test, and the movement tests.

Protocol 1 is expected to begin in late June 2025 and involve N=20 participants. After protocol 1 is complete, TayCo Brace, Inc. will make adjustments to the sXAB such as device placement on the brace, algorithms to output outcome measures, etc. that will be tested during protocol 2. Protocol 2 is expected to begin in September 2025 and will involve N=40 participants. Although device feasibility studies typically involve smaller sample sizes, this study includes a larger cohort (N = 60) to enable evaluation of sensor-derived metrics across a broad range of functional tasks. The study aims to determine whether gait and balance measures obtained from an ankle brace integrated with inertial measurement units are comparable to those from gold-standard laboratory tools, such as motion capture and research-grade IMUs.

The ankle brace used in this study is an FDA Class I exempt device. The version used includes integrated commercially available inertial sensors in which the investigators are evaluating their use with the brace against standard laboratory-based systems. The study does not involve a new intended use or clinical treatment evaluation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gait Balance Biomechanical Data Postural Control Locomotion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

This is a randomized, open-label, single-group interventional study evaluating the measurement feasibility of the TayCo Brace, Inc. sensor-enabled Athletic X ankle brace (sXAB). The primary purpose of this study is to conduct a clinical trial to test a prototype device for feasibility and not health outcomes. To do so, we will compare gait and balance metrics derived from the sXAB to those from gold-standard motion capture and research-grade inertial measurement units (IMUs). Participants may complete one or both protocols. Protocol/cohort 1 includes a balance test and walking at two speeds with and without the sXAB. Protocol/cohort 2 includes a balance test, stair ascent, stair descent, drop landing, walking, and running, all performed under brace and no-brace conditions. The order of bracing conditions will be randomized for each participant, as will the order of tasks and speeds within each condition. The study is not blinded.
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single Group: Brace and No-Brace Conditions

This study includes a single group of participants (collected across two cohorts) who complete movement tasks under two within-subject conditions: (1) wearing a sensor-enabled ankle brace ("brace" condition), and (2) without the brace ("no-brace" condition). Each participant serves as their own control. The brace condition order is randomized, and all participants experience both conditions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sensor-enabled Athletic X Ankle Brace (sXAB)

Intervention Type DEVICE

The intervention is a sensor-enabled version of the TayCo Brace, Inc. Athletic X Ankle Brace (sXAB), which integrates commercially available inertial measurement units (IMUs) into the structure of the brace. The brace is worn on the ankle of the dominant limb during functional movement tasks to evaluate its ability to produce valid gait and balance metrics compared to laboratory-grade measurement systems.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sensor-enabled Athletic X Ankle Brace (sXAB)

The intervention is a sensor-enabled version of the TayCo Brace, Inc. Athletic X Ankle Brace (sXAB), which integrates commercially available inertial measurement units (IMUs) into the structure of the brace. The brace is worn on the ankle of the dominant limb during functional movement tasks to evaluate its ability to produce valid gait and balance metrics compared to laboratory-grade measurement systems.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy adults: ages 18 - 40 years
* considered "healthy to exercise" as determined by the physical activity readiness questionnaire (PAR-Q)


* Classified as "moderate" or "high" activity level as defined by the scoring criteria of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ)
* Comfortably fit into combat boots provided by the laboratory (Men's sizes 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and Women's sizes 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 will be purchased, and so participants with foot lengths of 22.54-29.27.8 cm are expected to fit in the boots provided).

Exclusion Criteria

* Smoking tobacco on a regular basis
* Previous lower back or lower limb surgery (including the joints of the pelvis and lower limbs)
* Musculoskeletal injury sustained within the 12-weeks prior to enrollment . A musculoskeletal injury is defined as musculoskeletal pain causing a reduction or stoppage of normal physical activity for at least 3 days within a 7-day period, and have not returned to their normal physical activity and exercise without pain for at least the last 6-weeks.
* Pregnant (women only)
* Current or history of an unresolved musculoskeletal, neurological, cardiovascular, pulmonary/respiratory, metabolic, renal condition, disease, or problem.
* Torn anterior or posterior cruciate ligament (ACL or PCL).
* Any other disease or problems that may affect movement or the ability to exercise even at a low intensity.


* Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IDFAI) score of \<11.
* unable to comfortably perform the drop landing condition.
* Feet are too large or too small to fit comfortably in the combat boots provided.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

TAYCO BRACE, INC

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

United States Air Force

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Indiana University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Allison Gruber, PhD

Associate Professor of Kinesiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Allison H Gruber, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Indiana University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Indiana University, School of Public Health - Bloomington

Bloomington, Indiana, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Allison H Gruber, PhD

Role: CONTACT

8128562447

Adriana M Alamilla, MS

Role: CONTACT

708-745-8368

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Allison H Gruber, PhD

Role: primary

8128562447

Adriana M Alamilla, MS

Role: backup

708-745-8368 ext. Gruber

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rhon DI, Greenlee TA, Cook CE, Westrick RB, Umlauf JA, Fraser JJ. Fractures and Chronic Recurrence are Commonly Associated with Ankle Sprains: a 5-year Population-level Cohort of Patients Seen in the U.S. Military Health System. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Oct 1;16(5):1313-1322. doi: 10.26603/001c.27912. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34631252 (View on PubMed)

Gurchiek RD, Choquette RH, Beynnon BD, Slauterbeck JR, Tourville TW, Toth MJ, McGinnis RS. Open-Source Remote Gait Analysis: A Post-Surgery Patient Monitoring Application. Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 29;9(1):17966. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54399-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31784691 (View on PubMed)

Hafer JF, Provenzano SG, Kern KL, Agresta CE, Grant JA, Zernicke RF. Measuring markers of aging and knee osteoarthritis gait using inertial measurement units. J Biomech. 2020 Jan 23;99:109567. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109567. Epub 2019 Dec 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31916999 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FWR20240183X

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

22304

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Comparison of Various Prosthetic Foot-Ankle Mechanisms
NCT05964855 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Ankle Instability Using Foot Intensive Rehabilitation
NCT04493645 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA