Using IF-THEN Plans to Support Patients in Raising Safety Concerns About Their Care

NCT ID: NCT07084090

Last Updated: 2025-12-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-12-08

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the present research is to test the effectiveness of an implementation intention-based intervention for promoting the raising of safety concerns by patients in healthcare settings.

Each participant will be randomly allocated to one of two conditions: (1) a control condition, and (2) an intervention condition, in which participants form multiple implementation intentions (i.e. "if-then" plans) using a structured online interface. The main outcome measure will be the frequency with which participants report raising safety concerns in healthcare settings over a 12-month follow-up period.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background and study aims Previous research has demonstrated that while patients are often encouraged to raise concerns about the safety of their care, many feel uncertain about how and when to do so. This uncertainty can stem from a lack of confidence, fear of repercussions, or simply not knowing the appropriate channels. This study therefore aims to test whether a brief, theory-based intervention based on implementation intentions (Gollwitzer, 1993) can increase patients' confidence and likelihood of raising safety concerns in healthcare settings.

Implementation intentions, or "if-then" plans, are a well-established method for changing behaviour. They work by helping individuals identify critical situations ("if") and link them to specific responses ("then"), thereby automating helpful behaviours and overcoming barriers. This approach has been shown to be effective in changing a wide range of behaviours, including smoking cessation, reducing alcohol consumption, increasing physical activity, and reducing self-harm.

This study will examine whether forming "if-then" plans can help patients overcome barriers to raising safety concerns. The intervention will be delivered via an online questionnaire to a representative sample of adults in the United Kingdom, with follow-up after 12 months to assess changes in behaviour.

The aim of the study is to test the effectiveness of an implementation intention-based intervention for promoting the raising of safety concerns by patients in healthcare settings.

Aims To test the effectiveness of an implementation intention-based intervention for promoting the raising of safety concerns by patients in healthcare settings.

Who can participate? Adults aged 18 and over with good verbal and written understanding of English. Participants will be recruited from YouGov's existing panel of UK residents.

What does the study involve?

Participants will complete an online questionnaire about their experiences and attitudes toward raising safety concerns in healthcare. They will then be randomly assigned to one of two groups:

1. Intervention Group (Volitional Help Sheet with Implementation Intentions):

Participants in this group will be asked to form implementation intentions-also known as "if-then" plans-specifically related to raising safety concerns. They will be presented with the stem: "If I am tempted not to raise concerns about my health care…" and provided with 10 evidence-based options to complete as many "if-then" plans as they wish. These options have been informed by behavioural science literature and have been shown to be effective in changing behaviours such as smoking cessation, reducing alcohol consumption, increasing physical activity, and reducing self-harm. Participants will link specific situations (the "if") with appropriate responses (the "then") using a structured online interface.
2. Control Group (Passive Control):

The (passive) control condition includes the same questionnaire as the experimental group, however participants are not presented with the intervention.

After 12 months, all participants will be invited to complete a follow-up questionnaire assessing how often they have raised safety concerns in healthcare settings.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating? Participants may benefit by gaining confidence in raising concerns about their care. The study is low risk, and participants can withdraw at any time before data anonymisation. All data will be collected and stored securely by YouGov and anonymised before being shared with the research team.

Where is the study run from? The University of Manchester (United Kingdom) When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for? July 2025 to May 2026 Who is funding the study? The NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration (Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration), at The University of Manchester.

Who is the main contact? Prof Christopher J. Armitage - [email protected] Dr Chris Keyworth - [email protected]

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Patient Safety Concerns

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention (volitional help sheet)

Participants in this group will be asked to form implementation intentions-also known as "if-then" plans-specifically related to raising safety concerns. They will be presented with the stem: "If I am tempted not to raise concerns about my health care…" and provided with 10 evidence-based options to complete as many "if-then" plans as they wish. These options have been informed by behavioural science literature and have been shown to be effective in changing behaviours such as smoking cessation, reducing alcohol consumption, increasing physical activity, and reducing self-harm. Participants will link specific situations (the "if") with appropriate responses (the "then") using a structured online interface.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Implementation intention planning

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Implementation intention planning to promote patient safety concerns

Control

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Implementation intention planning

Implementation intention planning to promote patient safety concerns

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Aged 18 and over Good verbal and written understanding of English

Exclusion Criteria

Aged under 18 years of age Poor verbal and written understanding of English
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Leeds

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Manchester

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr Chris Keyworth

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Chris Keyworth

Role: CONTACT

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Keyworth C, Epton T, Goldthorpe J, Calam R, Armitage CJ. Acceptability, reliability, and validity of a brief measure of capabilities, opportunities, and motivations ("COM-B"). Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Sep;25(3):474-501. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12417. Epub 2020 Apr 20.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32314500 (View on PubMed)

Gollwitzer, P. M. (1993). Goal achievement: The role of intentions. European review of social psychology, 4(1), 141-185.

Reference Type RESULT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2025-22683-41374

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Use of Facilitated STAIR Coach in Kenya
NCT06476457 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA