Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
40000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-09-01
2031-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Bloodstream infections (BSIs) and sepsis continue to pose significant public health challenges, contributing to high morbidity and mortality worldwide. According to the Global Burden of Diseases Study, BSIs and sepsis are associated with approximately 20% of global deaths. However, the clinical characteristics of BSIs have evolved over recent years, showing significant variability across different countries and continents. The diversity in management standards across regions further complicates the generalization and transferability of research findings. Despite the critical need for comprehensive data, BSI research in Europe remains fragmented, often limited to national-level studies.
Project Aim:
The EPIC-BSI project aims to address these challenges by establishing a multinational, collaborative bloodstream infection cohort across Europe and globally. The primary objectives are to:
* Integrate national BSI research into a cohesive multinational cohort that enable large-scale comparative research by standardizing BSI incidence data, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, and patient outcomes across European countries and beyond.
* Monitor shifts in BSI characteristics, including the emergence of multi-drug resistant organisms, and changes in risk groups, diagnostics, and therapies.
* Create a foundation for future studies and collaborations, such as integrating BSI data with international antibiotic usage, population data, health policy data, or by biobanking blood-borne pathogens for sequencing.
The study is divided into three arms focusing on BSI epidemiology (EPIC-BSI registry), diagnostics (EPIC-BSI Diagnostic Study) and management (EPIC-BSI Management study). The EPIC-BSI Management study is partitioned in different levels of data contribution to reduce barriers for centres and enable broad participation.
Specific Objectives and Endpoints:
EPIC-BSI Registry:
* Primary aim/endpoint: Establish an international prospective BSI cohort with anonymized inclusion of all BSI cases from participating centres allowing estimation of BSI incidence by pathogen in the participating centres.
* Secondary aims/endpoints:
* Analyse the incidence of BSIs across different settings and countries.
* Monitor changes in patient demographics (age, gender) and acquisition modes.
* Track shifts in antimicrobial resistance patterns.
* Review effects of infection control practices on MDRO-BSI frequency
EPIC-BSI Diagnostic Study:
* Primary aim/endpoint: Biannual evaluation of diagnostic procedures and standards regarding BSI at participating centres
* Secondary aims/endpoints:
* Assess the availability and use of (new) clinical and microbiological diagnostics.
* Identify gaps in diagnostic practices and time lags between scientific evidence, guideline publication and clinical implementation of new diagnostic utilities.
EPIC-BSI Management Study:
* Primary aim/endpoint: Analyse clinical data from BSI cases to evaluate management practices regarding the effect on in-hospital mortality and outcome on day 90 after onset incl. patient-reported outcomes (Desirability-of-outcome-ranking (DOOR) or health-related quality of life metrics)
* Secondary aims/endpoints:
* Identify differences in clinical management across countries and hospital types.
* Analyse the impact of antimicrobial resistance patterns on clinical outcomes.
* Evaluate the effectiveness of different established therapeutic regimens.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Molecular Diagnosis and Risk Stratification of Sepsis in India
NCT03727243
Sepsis: From Syndrome to Personalized Care
NCT04203979
Molecular Diagnosis and Risk Stratification of Sepsis
NCT01905033
Bio-clinical Evolutive Dynamic in Patients Suffering From Communitary Septic Shock (Biosepsis)
NCT01668329
Comparison of Sepsis Prediction Algorithms
NCT05943938
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
EPIC BSI Registry
Registry of bloodstream infection patients from microbiological databases
No interventions assigned to this group
EPIC BSI Diagnostics
Repeated survey of participating centers regarding their diagnostic standard of care
No interventions assigned to this group
EPIC BSI Management
Registry of bloodstream infection patients with focus on clinical course and management
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* EPIC-BSI Diagnostic study: Centre recruiting for the EPIC study with access to microbiological and clinical data.
* EPIC-BSI Management study - Regular dataset: First two BSI cases per month of (at least two or three) target pathogens (S. aureus, E. faecalis/E. faecium, E. coli, Klebsiella spp., P. aeruginosa, A. baumanii, Streptococcus spp.)
Exclusion Criteria
* EPIC-BSI Diagnostic Study: EPIC BSI centre does not participate in the EPIC BSI Diagnostic Study arm
* EPIC-BSI Management Study: Non-comprehensive documentation and reporting of BSI cases; Age \< 18 years; For Follow-up part: Patient with dementia or other progressed neurological or vigilance disorder without contact details of legal representative, which makes follow-up unfeasible
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital Freiburg
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Philipp Mathe
Prof. Siegbert Rieg/Dr. Philipp Mathé
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Siegbert Rieg, Prof. Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital Freiburg
Philipp Mathé, Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital Freiburg
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
24-1521-S1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.