Effects of Maitland and Mulligan Spinal Mobilizations Along With Canal Enlargement Exercises in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

NCT ID: NCT07080073

Last Updated: 2025-07-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

38 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-07-31

Study Completion Date

2025-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomised controlled trial will evaluate the comparative effects of Maitland versus Mulligan spinal mobilization techniques, when combined with canal enlargement exercises, in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). A total of 38 participants aged 25-40 years with confirmed unilateral LSS will be randomly assigned to receive either Maitland mobilizations or Mulligan mobilizations, along with standard physiotherapy and canal enlargement exercises. The intervention will be administered over three weeks, with four sessions per week. Primary outcomes will include pain intensity (measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale), disability (Modified Oswestry Disability Index), and symptom severity (Swiss Spinal Stenosis Score), assessed at baseline and post-treatment. This study aims to inform physiotherapy practice by identifying the more effective manual therapy technique for improving functional outcomes in LSS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This single-blinded, randomised controlled trial is designed to compare the effects of two manual therapy techniques, Maitland central posterior-anterior Grade III mobilizations and Mulligan spinal mobilizations (SNAGs), when combined with canal enlargement exercises and conventional physiotherapy. Thirty-eight participants with confirmed unilateral lumbar spinal stenosis will be recruited from the outpatient physiotherapy department at Allama Iqbal Memorial Teaching Hospital, Sialkot.

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups using sealed opaque envelopes. Group A will receive Maitland mobilizations in addition to canal enlargement exercises and conventional physiotherapy, while Group B will receive Mulligan mobilizations along with the same exercise and conventional therapy protocol. The intervention will be administered four times per week over a period of three weeks (total of 12 sessions).

The canal enlargement protocol includes bilateral knee-to-chest exercises, LION stretches, and cat-camel movements, all of which aim to increase lumbar flexion and spinal canal space. Conventional physiotherapy treatment will include the application of hot packs, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and stretching of the hamstrings and piriformis muscles.

Primary outcomes will be assessed at baseline and after the 3-week intervention. These include:

Pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale, NPRS)

Functional disability (Modified Oswestry Disability Index, MODI)

Symptom severity (Swiss Spinal Stenosis Score, SSSS)

Data will be analysed using appropriate parametric and non-parametric statistical tests, based on data distribution. The findings of this study will provide insight into which mobilization technique is more effective in reducing pain and disability and improving function in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. This may contribute to the development of more evidence-based physiotherapy protocols for LSS management.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Stenosis Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Maitland Mobilization Group

Participants in this group will receive Maitland Grade III central posterior-anterior spinal mobilizations targeting the lumbar spine. The intervention will be administered by a licensed physiotherapist with the patient in a prone position, applying oscillatory mobilization for 3 sets of 40 seconds with 1-minute rest intervals. This will be combined with:

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Maitland Mobilization Group

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants in this group will receive Maitland Grade III central posterior-anterior spinal mobilizations targeting the lumbar spine. The intervention will be administered by a licensed physiotherapist with the patient in a prone position, applying oscillatory mobilization for 3 sets of 40 seconds with 1-minute rest intervals.

Canal enlargement exercises (bilateral knee-to-chest, LION stretch, cat-camel exercise) The total treatment will be administered four sessions per week for three weeks (12 sessions total).

Mulligan Mobilization Group

Participants in this group will receive Mulligan spinal mobilizations with lower limb movement (SNAGs). The therapist will apply sustained passive glides to the lumbar spinous process while the patient actively elevates the leg in a pain-free range. Mobilizations will be performed in 3 sets of 7-10 repetitions. This will be combined with:

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mulligan Mobilization Group

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants in this group will receive Mulligan spinal mobilizations with lower limb movement (SNAGs). The therapist will apply sustained passive glides to the lumbar spinous process while the patient actively elevates the leg in a pain-free range. Mobilizations will be performed in 3 sets of 7-10 repetitions.

Canal enlargement exercises (bilateral knee-to-chest, LION stretch, cat-camel exercise) The total treatment will be administered four sessions per week for three weeks (12 sessions total).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Maitland Mobilization Group

Participants in this group will receive Maitland Grade III central posterior-anterior spinal mobilizations targeting the lumbar spine. The intervention will be administered by a licensed physiotherapist with the patient in a prone position, applying oscillatory mobilization for 3 sets of 40 seconds with 1-minute rest intervals.

Canal enlargement exercises (bilateral knee-to-chest, LION stretch, cat-camel exercise) The total treatment will be administered four sessions per week for three weeks (12 sessions total).

Intervention Type OTHER

Mulligan Mobilization Group

Participants in this group will receive Mulligan spinal mobilizations with lower limb movement (SNAGs). The therapist will apply sustained passive glides to the lumbar spinous process while the patient actively elevates the leg in a pain-free range. Mobilizations will be performed in 3 sets of 7-10 repetitions.

Canal enlargement exercises (bilateral knee-to-chest, LION stretch, cat-camel exercise) The total treatment will be administered four sessions per week for three weeks (12 sessions total).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age group between 25-40 years

* Both males and females will be included
* Patient with low back pain along with unilateral radiating symptoms
* Having symptoms from at least 3 months with pain severity not more than 7 on NPRS
* Diagnosed case of slipped disc or herniation causing spinal stenosis, confirmed by physical examination and/or MRI.

Exclusion Criteria

* Chronic inflammatory or infectious disease, neoplasm, hematological disorders, traumatic vertebral injuries, Spondylitis

* Any concurrent major disease like renal failure, diabetes, cancer, tumor.
* Low back pain with bilateral radiating symptoms.
* Pregnancy
* Cognitive alteration and non-co-operative patient
* Spinal surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Riphah International University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Amna Zia, Phd Scholar

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Riphah International University

Areej Ijaz, MSc Student

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Riphah International University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Allama Iqbal memorial teaching hospital

Sialkot, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Samrood Akram, Phd Scholar

Role: CONTACT

03324806143

Amna Zia, Phd Scholar

Role: CONTACT

03244686993

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Dr Zunaira

Role: primary

03316630234

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Munakomi S, Foris LA, Varacallo MA. Spinal Stenosis and Neurogenic Claudication. 2023 Aug 13. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430872/

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28613622 (View on PubMed)

Homayouni K, Naseri M, Zaravar F, Zaravar L, Karimian H. Comparison of the Effect of Aquatic Physical Therapy and Conventional Physical Therapy in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (a Randomized Controlled Trial). Journal of Musculoskeletal Research. 2015;18(01)

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Gaur P, Goyal M, Singh G. Manual therapy and canal enlargement exercises versus conventional physiotherapy in lumbar stenosis - a study protocol. Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia. 2021;11

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Kumar S, A N. Effect of Integrated Exercise Protocol in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis as Compare with Conventional Physiotherapy- A Randomized Control Trial. International Journal of Neurorehabilitation. 2017;04(06).

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Maitland G. Management of lumbar spine disorder. Maitland's vertebral manipulation 8th ed United Kingdom: Churchill Livingstone. 2013:230-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REC/RCR & AHS/24/0166 Areej

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.