Effects of Maitland and Mulligan Spinal Mobilizations Along With Canal Enlargement Exercises in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT ID: NCT07080073
Last Updated: 2025-07-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
38 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-07-31
2025-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain
NCT06049277
Comparison of Spinal Stabilization Exercises Vs Maitland Mobilization Along With Laser Therapy
NCT05421871
Comparative Effects of Maitland's Rotation Mobilization and Mulligan's Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement on Lumbar Radiculopathy
NCT07050966
Effects of Pelvic Tilt Exercises With and Without Facet Joint Manipulation in Patients With Maigne's Syndrome
NCT05052060
Mulligan BLR Versus Mulligan TSLR Versus Neural Mobilization n Patient With Lumber Radiculopathy
NCT05258214
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups using sealed opaque envelopes. Group A will receive Maitland mobilizations in addition to canal enlargement exercises and conventional physiotherapy, while Group B will receive Mulligan mobilizations along with the same exercise and conventional therapy protocol. The intervention will be administered four times per week over a period of three weeks (total of 12 sessions).
The canal enlargement protocol includes bilateral knee-to-chest exercises, LION stretches, and cat-camel movements, all of which aim to increase lumbar flexion and spinal canal space. Conventional physiotherapy treatment will include the application of hot packs, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and stretching of the hamstrings and piriformis muscles.
Primary outcomes will be assessed at baseline and after the 3-week intervention. These include:
Pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale, NPRS)
Functional disability (Modified Oswestry Disability Index, MODI)
Symptom severity (Swiss Spinal Stenosis Score, SSSS)
Data will be analysed using appropriate parametric and non-parametric statistical tests, based on data distribution. The findings of this study will provide insight into which mobilization technique is more effective in reducing pain and disability and improving function in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. This may contribute to the development of more evidence-based physiotherapy protocols for LSS management.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Maitland Mobilization Group
Participants in this group will receive Maitland Grade III central posterior-anterior spinal mobilizations targeting the lumbar spine. The intervention will be administered by a licensed physiotherapist with the patient in a prone position, applying oscillatory mobilization for 3 sets of 40 seconds with 1-minute rest intervals. This will be combined with:
Maitland Mobilization Group
Participants in this group will receive Maitland Grade III central posterior-anterior spinal mobilizations targeting the lumbar spine. The intervention will be administered by a licensed physiotherapist with the patient in a prone position, applying oscillatory mobilization for 3 sets of 40 seconds with 1-minute rest intervals.
Canal enlargement exercises (bilateral knee-to-chest, LION stretch, cat-camel exercise) The total treatment will be administered four sessions per week for three weeks (12 sessions total).
Mulligan Mobilization Group
Participants in this group will receive Mulligan spinal mobilizations with lower limb movement (SNAGs). The therapist will apply sustained passive glides to the lumbar spinous process while the patient actively elevates the leg in a pain-free range. Mobilizations will be performed in 3 sets of 7-10 repetitions. This will be combined with:
Mulligan Mobilization Group
Participants in this group will receive Mulligan spinal mobilizations with lower limb movement (SNAGs). The therapist will apply sustained passive glides to the lumbar spinous process while the patient actively elevates the leg in a pain-free range. Mobilizations will be performed in 3 sets of 7-10 repetitions.
Canal enlargement exercises (bilateral knee-to-chest, LION stretch, cat-camel exercise) The total treatment will be administered four sessions per week for three weeks (12 sessions total).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Maitland Mobilization Group
Participants in this group will receive Maitland Grade III central posterior-anterior spinal mobilizations targeting the lumbar spine. The intervention will be administered by a licensed physiotherapist with the patient in a prone position, applying oscillatory mobilization for 3 sets of 40 seconds with 1-minute rest intervals.
Canal enlargement exercises (bilateral knee-to-chest, LION stretch, cat-camel exercise) The total treatment will be administered four sessions per week for three weeks (12 sessions total).
Mulligan Mobilization Group
Participants in this group will receive Mulligan spinal mobilizations with lower limb movement (SNAGs). The therapist will apply sustained passive glides to the lumbar spinous process while the patient actively elevates the leg in a pain-free range. Mobilizations will be performed in 3 sets of 7-10 repetitions.
Canal enlargement exercises (bilateral knee-to-chest, LION stretch, cat-camel exercise) The total treatment will be administered four sessions per week for three weeks (12 sessions total).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Both males and females will be included
* Patient with low back pain along with unilateral radiating symptoms
* Having symptoms from at least 3 months with pain severity not more than 7 on NPRS
* Diagnosed case of slipped disc or herniation causing spinal stenosis, confirmed by physical examination and/or MRI.
Exclusion Criteria
* Any concurrent major disease like renal failure, diabetes, cancer, tumor.
* Low back pain with bilateral radiating symptoms.
* Pregnancy
* Cognitive alteration and non-co-operative patient
* Spinal surgery
25 Years
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Riphah International University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Amna Zia, Phd Scholar
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riphah International University
Areej Ijaz, MSc Student
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riphah International University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Allama Iqbal memorial teaching hospital
Sialkot, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Dr Zunaira
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Munakomi S, Foris LA, Varacallo MA. Spinal Stenosis and Neurogenic Claudication. 2023 Aug 13. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430872/
Homayouni K, Naseri M, Zaravar F, Zaravar L, Karimian H. Comparison of the Effect of Aquatic Physical Therapy and Conventional Physical Therapy in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (a Randomized Controlled Trial). Journal of Musculoskeletal Research. 2015;18(01)
Gaur P, Goyal M, Singh G. Manual therapy and canal enlargement exercises versus conventional physiotherapy in lumbar stenosis - a study protocol. Revista Pesquisa em Fisioterapia. 2021;11
Kumar S, A N. Effect of Integrated Exercise Protocol in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis as Compare with Conventional Physiotherapy- A Randomized Control Trial. International Journal of Neurorehabilitation. 2017;04(06).
Maitland G. Management of lumbar spine disorder. Maitland's vertebral manipulation 8th ed United Kingdom: Churchill Livingstone. 2013:230-6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REC/RCR & AHS/24/0166 Areej
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.