Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain
NCT ID: NCT06049277
Last Updated: 2024-01-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-09-25
2024-01-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
McKenzie vs Manual Therapy for Low Back Pain
NCT06955117
Mulligan BLR Versus Mulligan TSLR Versus Neural Mobilization n Patient With Lumber Radiculopathy
NCT05258214
Positional Release Technique Versus Stretching Exercises In Patients With Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain
NCT07026071
Effects of Myofascial Release Therapy and Endurance Training on Mechanical Back Pain
NCT05272098
Comparative Effects of Maitland's Rotation Mobilization and Mulligan's Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement on Lumbar Radiculopathy
NCT07050966
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A randomized control trial will be conducted at Rehab Care and Jinnah Hospital Lahore, from 1st June - 31st January 2024. Both genders and age range 28-50 years clinically diagnosed patient with Lumbar radiculopathy will be included. The patients with Fracture, Trauma, Inflammatory disorder, acute disc bulge, Lumbar instability will be excluded. Subjects will be divided into two equal groups through a computer-generated random number. Sixteen patients in group A will be treated with Mulligan techniques and Sixteen patients in group B with McKenzie for four weeks at two session per week and single session per day. Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry Disability Scale and lumbar Range of Motion will be used as an assessment tool and were measured at baseline and at the completion 4 weeks intervention. The data will be entered and analyzed with SPSS to draw the statistical and clinical significance of both interventions. Results will be presented as mean and standard deviation for numerical variables like Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry Disability Scale and lumber Range of Motion. Analysis will be done by statistical package for social sciences SPSS 29
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Mulligan techniques with manual traction
Mulligan techniques with manual traction
Mulligan techniques with manual traction
group A will be treated with Mulligan techniques with manual traction.16 patients in group A will be treated with Mulligan Techniques SNAGS in sitting, standing and prone position by applying Antero cranial glide in the direction of treatment plane over the spinous or transverse process and Spinal mobilization with leg movement at 6 to 8 repetitions per sessions and spinal mobilization with leg movement will be performed in side lying, patient facing the physiotherapist while the leg movement may assisted by another person (Physiotherapist/assistant). Sustained transverse glide is given on the desired spinous process with 10 repetitions of offending movement in first session while 10 reps in each of 3 sets in further sessions.
McKenzie extension exercises with manual traction
McKenzie extension exercises with manual traction
McKenzie extension exercises with manual traction
group B will be treated McKenzie extension exercises with manual traction.16 patients in group B will be treated with McKenzie active EEP in prone position with repeated movements along with standard protocols. McKenzie Extension Exercises performed actively in prone position. Extension exercises performed in three stages, initially patient instructed to be just lift the neck and look on front at the eye level, then progressed next and weight bearing on the elbow by lifting up the shoulder and then moved on third and final steps in which complete trunk extension is performed and weight bearing is on the hands.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mulligan techniques with manual traction
group A will be treated with Mulligan techniques with manual traction.16 patients in group A will be treated with Mulligan Techniques SNAGS in sitting, standing and prone position by applying Antero cranial glide in the direction of treatment plane over the spinous or transverse process and Spinal mobilization with leg movement at 6 to 8 repetitions per sessions and spinal mobilization with leg movement will be performed in side lying, patient facing the physiotherapist while the leg movement may assisted by another person (Physiotherapist/assistant). Sustained transverse glide is given on the desired spinous process with 10 repetitions of offending movement in first session while 10 reps in each of 3 sets in further sessions.
McKenzie extension exercises with manual traction
group B will be treated McKenzie extension exercises with manual traction.16 patients in group B will be treated with McKenzie active EEP in prone position with repeated movements along with standard protocols. McKenzie Extension Exercises performed actively in prone position. Extension exercises performed in three stages, initially patient instructed to be just lift the neck and look on front at the eye level, then progressed next and weight bearing on the elbow by lifting up the shoulder and then moved on third and final steps in which complete trunk extension is performed and weight bearing is on the hands.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients of both gender
* Clinically diagnosed patient with Lumbar radiculopathy
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who have recently received corticosteroids
* Diagnosed cases of osteoporosis
* History of recent Fracture
* Lumber instability
* Trauma
* Inflammatory disorders
* Acute disc bulge
20 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Riphah International University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Syed Shakil ur Rehman
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riphah International University, Lahore, Pakistan
Maira Saeed
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riphah International University, Lahore, Pakistan
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Jinnah Hospital Lahore, Rehab Care
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Buran Cirak Y, Yurdaisik I, Elbasi ND, Tutuneken YE, Koce K, Cinar B. Effect of Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides on Stiffness of Lumbar Stabilizer Muscles in Patients With Nonspecific Low Back Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021 Jul-Aug;44(6):445-454. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
Tul Ain SQ, Shakil Ur Rehman S, Maryam M, Kiani SK. Effects of Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides with and without thoracic posture correction techniques on mechanical back pain: a randomized control trial. J Pak Med Assoc. 2019 Nov;69(11):1584-1587. doi: 10.5455/JPMA.274875..
Waqqar S, Shakil-Ur-Rehman S, Ahmad S. McKenzie treatment versus mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides for chronic mechanical low back pain. Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Mar-Apr;32(2):476-9. doi: 10.12669/pjms.322.9127.
Cuesta-Vargas A, Farasyn A, Gabel CP, Luciano JV. The mechanical and inflammatory low back pain (MIL) index: development and validation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Jan 9;15:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-12.
O'Sullivan PB, Phyty GD, Twomey LT, Allison GT. Evaluation of specific stabilizing exercise in the treatment of chronic low back pain with radiologic diagnosis of spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Dec 15;22(24):2959-67. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199712150-00020.
Chitale N Jr, Patil DS, Phansopkar P, Joshi A. A Review on Treatment Approaches for Chronic Low Back Pain via Mulligans Movement With Mobilization and Physical Therapy. Cureus. 2022 Aug 18;14(8):e28127. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28127. eCollection 2022 Aug.
Salik S RS, Hayaat R, Manzoor S, Malik AU, Maqbool S. Comparison of Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides verses Mckenzie extension exercises on disability and functional outcomes in patients with acute nonspecific low back pain. PJMHS. 2022;16(10):1:5.
May S, Donelson R. Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with the McKenzie method. Spine J. 2008 Jan-Feb;8(1):134-41. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.017.
Almeida MO, Narciso Garcia A, Menezes Costa LC, van Tulder MW, Lin CC, Machado LA. The McKenzie method for (sub)acute non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 5;4(4):CD009711. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009711.pub2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REC/RCR&AHS/23/0133 Maira
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.