Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation After Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
NCT ID: NCT07066748
Last Updated: 2025-07-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
34 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-08-31
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pediatric Ventilation Weaning
NCT04023643
Therapy Study of Automated Protocolized vs. Physician-Directed Non-Protocolized Weaning
NCT00606788
Complications of the Alveolar Opening Maneuver in Children on Mechanical Ventilation
NCT07233304
Pressure Support Ventilation Versus Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist in Difficult to Wean Pediatric Patients
NCT04360590
WOB and Paediatric Mechanical Ventilation
NCT05254691
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Pressure support ventilation (PSV) has been widely used in the performance of a spontaneous breathing trial because it can compensate to some extent for the additional work of breathing imposed by the endotracheal tube and the breathing circuit. However, it is difficult to recognize the exact pressure support to overcome the tubing resistance during the weaning process till extubating.
The ventilator modality of automatic tube compensation (ATC) can provide variable pressure supports during the weaning process to overcome any change in the resistance of the breathing circuit, endotracheal tube, and airways. ATC is effective in overcoming the work of breathing caused by airway resistance to allow successful weaning process and extubating.
Several studies have investigated the effectiveness of ATC and PS for ventilatory weaning in adult patients, with conflicting results. Fewer studies have focused on the pediatric population, and even fewer have specifically examined patients who have undergone cardiac surgery. Therefore, there is a need for further research to determine the most effective weaning mode for this patient population.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group P: weaning using pressure support ventilation mode
Group P: Weaning trial will be done for patients using PSV 8 cmH2O without ATC.
group P:pressure support ventilation mode
Group P: Weaning trial will be done for patients using PSV 8 cmH2O without ATC
group A:Autmated tube compensation mode
Group A: Weaning trial will be done for patients using PSV 0 cmH2O with 100% automatic tube compensation (ATC).
group A:automatic tube compensation (ATC).
Group A: Weaning trial will be done for patients using PSV 0 cmH2O with 100% automatic tube compensation (ATC).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
group P:pressure support ventilation mode
Group P: Weaning trial will be done for patients using PSV 8 cmH2O without ATC
group A:automatic tube compensation (ATC).
Group A: Weaning trial will be done for patients using PSV 0 cmH2O with 100% automatic tube compensation (ATC).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Both sex.
3. after fulfilling weaning criteria
4. being pain free (observational pain/discomfort scale \< 4). the weaning criteria; which include: low mandatory ventilator rate \[6-8\] or less; fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) ≤ 40; level of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) \[3-5 cmH2O\] guided by pressure/volume loop; reversal of the cause of postoperative mechanical ventilation; oxygenation index (OI) (mean air way pressure × FIO2/PaO2) \< 5; dynamic compliance (Cdyn) \> 1 ml/ cmH2O/kg
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients on high inotropic support (unstable hemodynamics)
3. Patients with disturbed conscious level
4. Patients with palliative cardiac shunting procedures (e.g., BT shunt, Glenn shunt).
2 Years
10 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Alexandria University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Islam Elbardan
LECTURER OF ANESTHESIA AND SURGICALMINTENSIVE CARE
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
LECTURER OF ANESTHESIA AND SURGICAL INTENSIVE CARE, Dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Alexandria
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of medicine ,Alexandria university
Alexandria, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
serial number:0307330
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.