Weaning Children From Mechanical Ventilation:Computer-driven System Versus Usual Care
NCT ID: NCT00678912
Last Updated: 2012-09-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-09-30
2009-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Intervention: A pre-inclusion test (pressure support test) with a level of pressure support of ± 5 cmH2O of the P plateau, but no greater than 30 cmH2O (pressure-support level plus positive end-expiratory pressure), is performed to evaluate the patient's tolerance of this ventilation mode; the test is repeated daily until positive. The test could be stopped before 30 minutes if the patient showed evidence of respiratory distress (respiratory rate \> 40 breaths per minute and FiO2 \> 60% in order to obtain pulse oxymetry ≥ 95%). The test is considered positive when, after 30 minutes, the patient remained clinically stable with a respiratory rate lower than 40 breaths per minute and an expiratory tidal volume higher than 6 ml per kilogram of body weight within the authorized pressure-support range, with pulse oxymetry no lower than 95 percent when the fraction of inspired oxygen was no greater than 60 percent. When the pressure-support test is positive, the patient is randomized either to Arm 1 where the intervention is weaning with the support of Smartcare/PS or to Arm 2 where the intervention is weaning based on usual care. Both group are ventilated with the same ventilator: Evita XL.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Children are mechanically ventilated with Smartcare/PS
Smartcare/PS
computer-driven protocol that adjusts pressure support level in pressure support mode to patient respiratory status
2
Children are mechanically ventilated with usual care
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Smartcare/PS
computer-driven protocol that adjusts pressure support level in pressure support mode to patient respiratory status
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* No vasopressor or inotropic medication, unless the patient is receiving some digitalin or small doses of dopamine (\< 5 µg/kg/min)
* Slight or no endotracheal tube gas-leakage (\[Vti - Vte\]/Vti ≤ 20%)
* Mechanical ventilation with a plateau pressure ≤ 25 cmH2O over PEEP
* PEEP ≤ 8 cmH2O
* FiO2 ≤ 60% in order to obtain pulse oxymetry ≥ 95%
* PaCO2 \< 70 mmHg on the last blood gases
* Extubation not expected the day of inclusion
Exclusion Criteria
2 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec
OTHER_GOV
St. Justine's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Philippe Jouvet
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Philippe A Jouvet, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Université de Montreal
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Sainte Justine
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jouvet P, Farges C, Hatzakis G, Monir A, Lesage F, Dupic L, Brochard L, Hubert P. Weaning children from mechanical ventilation with a computer-driven system (closed-loop protocol): a pilot study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2007 Sep;8(5):425-32. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000282157.77811.F9.
Jouvet PA, Payen V, Gauvin F, Emeriaud G, Lacroix J. Weaning children from mechanical ventilation with a computer-driven protocol: a pilot trial. Intensive Care Med. 2013 May;39(5):919-25. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2837-8. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CHUSJ-2239
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id