UPBEAT: Using Polygenic Scores to Guide BB Therapy in HF With Mildly Reduced EF

NCT ID: NCT07054489

Last Updated: 2025-11-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-11-30

Study Completion Date

2026-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will use polygenic scores, a tool which describes differences in genetics, to examine effectiveness of beta blocker medication in heart failure patients with ejection fraction of 41-50 percent. The study will also assess beta blockers' effect on the changes in left ventricular end-systolic volume index by MRI.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Heart failure (HF) is a major public health problem that displays wide variation in progression and response to therapy. Beta-blockers (BB) are the cornerstone of treatment for HF reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but only \~25% of patients experience a marked and sustained ejection fraction (EF) response, and they can have unwanted side effects (fatigue, depression, erectile dysfunction, others). The potential for Precision Medicine to improve HF care is great, but despite proof of concept, actionable ways are still lacking to use genomic or biomarker strategies to predict response to typical treatment. An important limitation of pharmacogenetics to date is that most studies used candidate gene approaches, assuming other loci are not meaningful. Unbiased approaches (e.g. genome-wide \[GW\] association) overcome this, but the typical analysis requires stringent significance levels which result in missing potentially important sources of variation. Common complex disease and drug responses are unlikely to be under strong single-loci influence (e.g., Mendelian disease), and instead are likely influenced by many loci that have relatively weak effects (i.e., polygenicity); such phenotypes are better tackled with approaches like polygenic risk scores. The PI has developed and validated a polygenic score for BB drug-response (in terms of mortality benefit) in HF for European ancestry patients and is currently developing a new score for diverse ancestries, particular African ancestry and admixed populations. To move this new paradigm for precision medicine forward to clinical utility, a randomized trial of BB by genomic (polygenic score) subgroups is needed. Moreover, pivotal trials of BB in HF excluded patients with mildly reduced EF (HFmEF, 40-50%), representing a public health issue of significant size (an estimated prevalence of 1.6M Americans) where currently BB may or may not be used and with limited data to guide who should or should not receive this key therapy. HFmEF patients have abnormal systolic function, high event rates, share many characteristics with HFrEF, and the polygenic response score correctly differentiates responders from non-responders in this group, making them the ideal group of patients in which to test genomically targeted BB treatment in a clinical trial. This pilot study will demonstrate feasibility of a future phase 2 study. That study, if successful would potentially revolutionize HF care by demonstrating signs of efficacy in terms of polygenic drug targeting.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Failure Polygenic Score

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Beta blocker Metoprolol

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two parallel group clinical trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Beta Blocker

This group will be dispensed and titrated on beta blocker according to study protocol.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Beta blocker

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants randomized to intervention will be dosed and titrated on beta blocker according to study protocol.

Placebo

This group will be dispensed and titrated on placebo according to study protocol.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Beta blocker

Participants randomized to intervention will be dosed and titrated on beta blocker according to study protocol.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18-89 years
* Ejection Fraction (EF) \>40% and =\<50% by any modality within 1 year (must be most recent)
* Clinical diagnosis of HF within 1 year, evidenced by any one: Hospital discharge with primary or secondary HF diagnosis, ER discharge with primary diagnosis of HF, ambulatory diagnostic code for HF and diuretic use, BNP\>35 ng/L or NTproBNP \>125 ng/L at any time

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable to provide informed consent
* Previous documented EF =\< 35%
* Currently on BB \>25% target dose
* Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic BP \> 180 at enrollment)
* Has contraindications to all BB or intolerance to metoprolol
* Systolic BP \< 100 or heart rate \<70
* Current cancer requiring active treatment
* Heart transplant or LVAD or expected in the next year
* Life expectancy \< 1 year for any reason
* Dialysis dependence or ESRD
* MI/ PCI/ CABG within 90 days prior to enrollment or planned in the future
* Absolute indication for BB other than heart failure (e.g. tachyarrhythmia required BB for rate control, angina)
* If PI decides for any reason participation in trial is not in best interest of the patient
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

89 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

David Lanfear

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

David Lanfear

Senior Staff Physician

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Lanfear, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Henry Ford Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Henry Ford Health

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Whitney Cabral, MS

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 313-949-6616

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Whitney Cabral

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

17427

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id