Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
486 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-07-01
2019-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
2. The research focused on four common operations: Stomach surgery (gastrectomy), Pancreas surgery (pancreatectomy), Liver surgery (hepatectomy) and andWhipple procedure
3. Researchers looked at medical records from 486 patients over five years. They compared how long each surgery took, how much blood was lost, and how many days patients stayed in the hospital.
4. The study wanted to see if robotic and laparoscopic surgeries help patients by making the surgery faster, safer, and with a quicker recovery.
5. The benefits depended on the type of surgery. In many cases, robotic and laparoscopic surgery led to shorter hospital stays, less bleeding, or faster surgeries. These results suggest that using newer technology can help make surgeries safer and recovery easier for patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Open Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery in Gastric Cancer Resection.
NCT03447106
Comparison of Short- and Long-term Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Hemicolectomy of Right Colon Cancer : A Multicenter Propensity Score Matching Analysis
NCT07029464
Application of Overlap Method to Digestive Tract Reconstruction of Totally Laparoscopic Left Colectomy
NCT05034692
Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Robotic vs Laparoscopic Right Colon Cancer: a 10-year Single-center Retrospective Study
NCT06454253
A Randomized Cross-over Trial of Comparison Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Suturing for Gastric Defect by Novices
NCT02235636
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2. Regardless of the surgical methods (laparotomy, laparoscopy, or da Vinci system), the first step after the patient enters the operating room is always anesthesia. After administering anesthesia, the following different operation procedures result in different viewing images. During laparotomy, the surgeon opens the patient's body directly and operates with the naked eye. One disadvantage of laparotomy is that large wounds require more time to recover. In 2-dimensional (2D) image laparoscopy, a 2D screen shows an image that allows the surgeon to perform stereoscopic surgery. Although most surgical processes are similar between laparoscopy and robotic surgery, the imaging system has undergone significant improvements in robotic surgery. In surgery using the da Vinci system, an endoscope that captures high-definition 3-dimensional (3D) images from the surgical site is utilized. Images are processed using a video processor in the vision cart and displayed on a 3D viewer and touchscreen.
3. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze two or more variables, and statistical significance was set at p \< 0.05. In this study, we analyzed the relationship between three different groups of surgical methods and three perioperative outcomes (operative time, hospital stay, and bleeding) in the context of four Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery (HPB) surgeries.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
three surgical methods in Laparotomy, Laparoscope, and da Vinci
no intervention
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Underwent one of the following surgeries: gastrectomy, liver resection, or pancreatectomy
3. Received surgery at Chung Shan Medical University Hospital between July 2015 and September 2019
4. Surgery performed by the general surgery team with experience in open, laparoscopic, and robotic (da Vinci) surgery
5. Surgical method included one of the following: open surgery (laparotomy), laparoscopic surgery, or robotic (da Vinci) surgery
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with incomplete or missing perioperative data (e.g., operative time, blood loss, or hospital stay)
3. Patients who underwent combined or staged surgical procedures unrelated to the HPB domain
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chung Shan Medical University
OTHER
National Chung Hsing University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
LIN, Ming-Hung
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cheng-Ming Peng, MD, Ph.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Department of Surgery, da Vinci Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
Taichung, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CS1-20103
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.