Sensory and Vascular Effects of Kinesio and Magnetic Tape in Healthy Subjects

NCT ID: NCT07034456

Last Updated: 2025-06-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-07-31

Study Completion Date

2026-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to evaluate the effects of a tape with magnetic particles versus a control kinesiotape on the skin's sensory and vascular responses in healthy volunteers. The tape is an elastic adhesive strip containing magnetic particles that may modulate sensory nerve endings. The hypothesis is that this magnetic tape can reduce pain and mechanical sensitivity and blood flow in the application area by stimulating cutaneous receptors.

Thirty healthy participants will receive four different combinations of two types of tapes (magnetic vs. placebo) and two creams (anesthetic vs. moisturizing), applied to the lower back in a randomized crossover design. Sensory thresholds and blood flow will be measured at three body regions: close to the application site (lower back), a segmentally related area (posterior thigh), and an unrelated distant site (forearm). Measurements will include pressure pain threshold, mechanical sensitivity, and tactile detection, using standardized tools and Doppler ultrasound

The study will help determine whether the effects of magnetic tape are local or systemic, whether they depend on skin receptor activation, and whether they can be blocked by topical anesthesia

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This randomized, single-blind, crossover clinical trial investigates the sensory and vascular effects of an elastic adhesive tape containing magnetic particles (Magnetic Tape®) when applied to the skin of healthy volunteers. The study employs a 2x2 factorial design, combining two types of tape (magnetic vs. placebo) and two types of topical cream (anesthetic vs. moisturizing), applied in four different sessions with a one-week washout between conditions. Each participant receives all four combinations in a randomized order

The main hypothesis is that magnetic tape may induce local sensory and vascular changes through the activation of cutaneous sensory afferents. A secondary hypothesis is that these effects may be diminished or abolished by topical anesthetic application, indicating a dependence on superficial nerve activation. A third hypothesis is that any effects will be limited to the dermatome of application, without spreading to distant or segmentally unrelated areas

Sensory testing includes pressure pain threshold (PPT), mechanical pain sensitivity (using numeric rating scale), and tactile detection threshold (using von Frey filaments). These assessments are conducted in three anatomical locations: the lumbar region (close to the application site), the posterior thigh (segmentally related area), and the forearm (unrelated site). Additionally, blood flow is assessed using color Doppler ultrasound. Additionally, the sensitivity of the aplicaction site will be also evaluated to assess the cream effects.

The study aims to improve understanding of the peripheral mechanisms involved in magnetic tape application, clarify the potential neuromodulatory role of cutaneous afferents, and determine whether the observed effects are mediated through local sensory mechanisms

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy Volunteers

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

A Clinical trial crossover design. Each participant will receive all four conditions combining two types of tape (magnetic vs. placebo) and two types of cream (anesthetic vs. moisturizing), in randomized order with one-week washout periods between session. This design is similar to 2x2 factorial, but with a repeated measures.
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo Tape with Moisturizing Cream (Crossover)

Participants will receive Placebo Tape with moisturizing cream

Each condition will be applied in a separate session with a one-week washout period. All participants complete every condition in randomized order.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Control KinesioTape

Intervention Type DEVICE

An elastic adhesive tape, designed to be applied directly to the skin. In this study, the tape is applied to the lumbar region. This tape does not content magnetic particles, thus is used as a comparator. The tape remains in place during standardized sensory and vascular measurements

Moisturizing Cream (control)

Intervention Type DEVICE

A neutral moisturizing cream (control) will be applied under occlusion prior to tape application during 30 minutes. The application will be blind and use as a placebo vs the anesthetic cream.

Magnetic Tape with moisturizing cream

Participants will receive Magnetic Tape with moisturizing cream

Each condition will be applied in a separate session with a one-week washout period. All participants complete every condition in randomized order.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tape with mangetic particles

Intervention Type DEVICE

An elastic adhesive tape containing magnetic particles, designed to be applied directly to the skin. In this study, the tape is applied to the lumbar region. The tape remains in place during standardized sensory and vascular measurements

Moisturizing Cream (control)

Intervention Type DEVICE

A neutral moisturizing cream (control) will be applied under occlusion prior to tape application during 30 minutes. The application will be blind and use as a placebo vs the anesthetic cream.

Magnetic Tape with anaesthetic cream

Participants will receive Magnetic Tape with anaesthetic cream Each condition will be applied in a separate session with a one-week washout period. All participants complete every condition in randomized order.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tape with mangetic particles

Intervention Type DEVICE

An elastic adhesive tape containing magnetic particles, designed to be applied directly to the skin. In this study, the tape is applied to the lumbar region. The tape remains in place during standardized sensory and vascular measurements

Topical Anesthetic Cream

Intervention Type DRUG

EMLA®, a topical anesthetic cream containing lidocaine and prilocaine, will be applied under occlusion prior to tape application during 30 minutes with the aim of anesthetize the cutaneous sensory receptors

Placebo Tape with Anesthetic Cream

Participants will receive Placebo Tape with Anesthetic cream Each condition will be applied in a separate session with a one-week washout period. All participants complete every condition in randomized order.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Topical Anesthetic Cream

Intervention Type DRUG

EMLA®, a topical anesthetic cream containing lidocaine and prilocaine, will be applied under occlusion prior to tape application during 30 minutes with the aim of anesthetize the cutaneous sensory receptors

Control KinesioTape

Intervention Type DEVICE

An elastic adhesive tape, designed to be applied directly to the skin. In this study, the tape is applied to the lumbar region. This tape does not content magnetic particles, thus is used as a comparator. The tape remains in place during standardized sensory and vascular measurements

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tape with mangetic particles

An elastic adhesive tape containing magnetic particles, designed to be applied directly to the skin. In this study, the tape is applied to the lumbar region. The tape remains in place during standardized sensory and vascular measurements

Intervention Type DEVICE

Topical Anesthetic Cream

EMLA®, a topical anesthetic cream containing lidocaine and prilocaine, will be applied under occlusion prior to tape application during 30 minutes with the aim of anesthetize the cutaneous sensory receptors

Intervention Type DRUG

Control KinesioTape

An elastic adhesive tape, designed to be applied directly to the skin. In this study, the tape is applied to the lumbar region. This tape does not content magnetic particles, thus is used as a comparator. The tape remains in place during standardized sensory and vascular measurements

Intervention Type DEVICE

Moisturizing Cream (control)

A neutral moisturizing cream (control) will be applied under occlusion prior to tape application during 30 minutes. The application will be blind and use as a placebo vs the anesthetic cream.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy young adults (18-35 years old)
* Participants interested in laser hair removal who have a prior prescription for EMLA cream

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Severe illnesses: diabetes, cancer, neurological conditions, depression, etc.
* Dermatological conditions or skin alterations (large wounds, scars, or tattoos)
* Allergy to lidocaine or prilocaine (components of EMLA cream)
* Having exercised within the previous 12 hours
* Use of any toxic substances or caffeine intake within the previous 12 hours
* Undergoing laser hair removal in the lumbar, posterior thigh, or anterior forearm areas within the past 24-48 hours
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Miguel Delicado Miralles

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gustavo Adolfo Sarriá

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Enrique Velasco Serna

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Patricia Beltra Lopez

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Patricia Beltra Lopez

BSc in Physiotherapy. MSc. PhD Candidate in Health Sciences. COFCV Registration No.: 6563

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Patricia Beltrá López, MsC in Science

Role: CONTACT

+34 638594795

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Smith E, Azzopardi C, Thaker S, Botchu R, Gupta H. Power Doppler in musculoskeletal ultrasound: uses, pitfalls and principles to overcome its shortcomings. J Ultrasound. 2021 Jun;24(2):151-156. doi: 10.1007/s40477-020-00489-0. Epub 2020 Jul 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32683646 (View on PubMed)

Sillevis R, Cuenca-Zaldivar JN, Fernandez-Carnero S, Garcia-Haba B, Sanchez Romero EA, Selva-Sarzo F. Neuromodulation of the Autonomic Nervous System in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Clinical Trial. Biomedicines. 2023 May 26;11(6):1551. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11061551.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37371646 (View on PubMed)

Selva-Sarzo F, Fernandez-Carnero S, Sillevis R, Hernandez-Garces H, Benitez-Martinez JC, Cuenca-Zaldivar JN. The Direct Effect of Magnetic Tape(R) on Pain and Lower-Extremity Blood Flow in Subjects with Low-Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Sensors (Basel). 2021 Sep 29;21(19):6517. doi: 10.3390/s21196517.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34640836 (View on PubMed)

Rampazo EP, Martignago CCS, de Noronha M, Liebano RE. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation in neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pain. 2022 Jan;26(1):18-42. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1845. Epub 2021 Aug 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34288255 (View on PubMed)

Popescu A, Lee H. Neck Pain and Lower Back Pain. Med Clin North Am. 2020 Mar;104(2):279-292. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2019.11.003. Epub 2019 Dec 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32035569 (View on PubMed)

Newman JS, Adler RS, Rubin JM. Power Doppler sonography: use in measuring alterations in muscle blood volume after exercise. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Jun;168(6):1525-30. doi: 10.2214/ajr.168.6.9168718.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9168718 (View on PubMed)

Lin S, Zhu B, Huang G, Wang C, Zeng Q, Zhang S. Short-Term Effect of Kinesiotaping on Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain and Disability: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Phys Ther. 2020 Feb 7;100(2):238-254. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz163.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31696916 (View on PubMed)

Lall MP, Restrepo E. The Biopsychosocial Model of Low Back Pain and Patient-Centered Outcomes Following Lumbar Fusion. Orthop Nurs. 2017 May/Jun;36(3):213-221. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000350.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28538537 (View on PubMed)

Kolahi J, Bang H, Park J. Towards a proposal for assessment of blinding success in clinical trials: up-to-date review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009 Dec;37(6):477-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2009.00494.x. Epub 2009 Sep 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19758415 (View on PubMed)

Knezevic NN, Candido KD, Vlaeyen JWS, Van Zundert J, Cohen SP. Low back pain. Lancet. 2021 Jul 3;398(10294):78-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00733-9. Epub 2021 Jun 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34115979 (View on PubMed)

Kazeminasab S, Nejadghaderi SA, Amiri P, Pourfathi H, Araj-Khodaei M, Sullman MJM, Kolahi AA, Safiri S. Neck pain: global epidemiology, trends and risk factors. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jan 3;23(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04957-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34980079 (View on PubMed)

Heres HM, Schoots T, Tchang BCY, Rutten MCM, Kemps HMC, van de Vosse FN, Lopata RGP. Perfusion dynamics assessment with Power Doppler ultrasound in skeletal muscle during maximal and submaximal cycling exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Jun;118(6):1209-1219. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3850-y. Epub 2018 Mar 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29569054 (View on PubMed)

Hayden JA, Ellis J, Ogilvie R, Malmivaara A, van Tulder MW. Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 28;9(9):CD009790. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009790.pub2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34580864 (View on PubMed)

Dori A, Abbasi H, Zaidman CM. Intramuscular blood flow quantification with power doppler ultrasonography. Muscle Nerve. 2016 Nov;54(5):872-878. doi: 10.1002/mus.25108. Epub 2016 Aug 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26994405 (View on PubMed)

Dias LV, Cordeiro MA, Schmidt de Sales R, Dos Santos MMBR, Korelo RIG, Vojciechowski AS, de Mace do ACB. Immediate analgesic effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and interferential current (IFC) on chronic low back pain: Randomised placebo-controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Jul;27:181-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34391232 (View on PubMed)

Corp N, Mansell G, Stynes S, Wynne-Jones G, Morso L, Hill JC, van der Windt DA. Evidence-based treatment recommendations for neck and low back pain across Europe: A systematic review of guidelines. Eur J Pain. 2021 Feb;25(2):275-295. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1679. Epub 2020 Nov 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33064878 (View on PubMed)

Bozkurt T, Kilic RT, Yosmaoglu HB. The effect of elastic therapeutic taping and rigid taping on pain, functionality, and tissue temperature in lumbar radiculopathy: a randomized controlled study. Somatosens Mot Res. 2021 Dec;38(4):373-380. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2021.1986381. Epub 2021 Oct 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34635000 (View on PubMed)

Bevan S. Economic impact of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) on work in Europe. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Jun;29(3):356-73. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Oct 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26612235 (View on PubMed)

Benarroch EE. Pain-autonomic interactions. Neurol Sci. 2006 May;27 Suppl 2:S130-3. doi: 10.1007/s10072-006-0587-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16688616 (View on PubMed)

Beltra P, Ruiz-Del-Portal I, Ortega FJ, Valdesuso R, Delicado-Miralles M, Velasco E. Sensorimotor effects of plasticity-inducing percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation protocols: a blinded, randomized clinical trial. Eur J Pain. 2022 May;26(5):1039-1055. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1928. Epub 2022 Mar 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35191131 (View on PubMed)

Alfano AP, Taylor AG, Foresman PA, Dunkl PR, McConnell GG, Conaway MR, Gillies GT. Static magnetic fields for treatment of fibromyalgia: a randomized controlled trial. J Altern Complement Med. 2001 Feb;7(1):53-64. doi: 10.1089/107555301300004538.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11246937 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Magnetic Tape/2025

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Electrolysis in Patients With Low Back Pain
NCT06661070 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
AI Driven Biofeedback Wearable
NCT04921410 COMPLETED NA