Effects of Muscle Energy Technique Versus Cervical and Scapulothoracic Stabilization Exercises in Upper Crossed Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT07025993

Last Updated: 2025-06-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-03-01

Study Completion Date

2025-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will be a randomized clinical trial and will be conducted in Younus Hospital, Tehsil headquarters hospital Daska, and Riphah Rehabilitation Clinic Lahore. Non-probability consecutive sampling will be used to collect the data. A sample size of 40 subjects with an age group between 18-65 years will be taken. Data will be collected from the patients having present complaints of Neck pain associated with upper cross syndrome. Outcome measures will be taken using the Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRPS) for pain and the Neck disability index (NDI) for neck functional health and craniovertebral angle for posture. An informed consent will be taken. Subjects will be selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and will be equally divided into two groups by a random number generator table. Both Groups will receive Moist Hot Pack, Cervical segmental mobilizations, and Free Neck Exercises (AROMs), while Group A will receive Muscle energy technique(eccentric muscle energy technique for the cervical spine with Mets for upper trapezius, Suboccipitalis and pectoralis muscle), and Group B will receive cervical and scapulothoracic stabilization exercises(axial elongation exercise, craniocervical flexion, cervical extension and Cervico-scapulothoracic stabilization exercises). Outcome measures will be measured at baseline and after 4 weeks. Data analysis will be done by SPSS version 25.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Neck pain is one of the most commonly occurring musculoskeletal disorders if left untreated can lead to severe complications. Cervical spine and soft tissue disorders e.g. muscles, ligaments, discs, facet joints, etc. are major causes of neck pain while neck pain caused by postural abnormality is termed as upper cross syndrome. Upper crossed syndrome (UCS) characterizes a prevalent postural dysfunction involving dysfunctional tone in the musculature of the neck, shoulders, and upper back that cross between the dorsal and the ventral sides of the body. This condition is given its name because an "X," in other words a cross, can be drawn across the upper body. One arm of the cross indicates the muscles that are typically tight/overly facilitated and the other arm of the cross indicates the muscles that are typically weak/overly inhibited. There are two types of muscles present in our body - the postural muscles such as pectoralis major, upper trapezius, and sternocleidomastoid, and other phasic muscles such as deep-neck flexors, and lower trapezius. In Upper Cross Syndrome (UCS) there is tightness of the upper trapezius and levator scapula on the dorsal side crosses with tightness of the pectoralis major and minor. Weakness of the deep cervical flexors, ventrally, crosses with weakness of the middle and lower trapezius. This pattern of imbalance creates joint dysfunction, particularly at the Atlanto-occipital joint, C4-C5 segment, cervicothoracic joint, glen humeral joint, and T4-T5 segment. Specific postural changes are seen in UCS, including forward head posture, increased cervical Lordosis and thoracic kyphosis, elevated and protracted shoulders, and rotation or abduction and winging of the scapulae. The main risk factor for developing UCS is maintaining an abnormal posture for a prolonged duration. Some daily activities that involve bad postures are often occupation-related. Repetitive tasks or continuous work for long hours can aggravate postural deviations. Because of increased work stress and a sedentary lifestyle, society is becoming more flexion-addicted attitude. In which people tend to frequently stoop forward. This is seen in office workers and students who tend to sit at a desk for prolonged periods, slouching forward to see the computer screen. Therefore, once muscle dysfunction starts, traditional muscle imbalance trends and altered posture follow. Head, neck structures can set limits on head's range of motion (ROM) and cause discomfort to the neck, mid-back muscle spasm/tightness, and decreased range of motion.

Understanding of which intervention yields better outcomes for pain relief, reduction in disability, and improvement in craniovertebral angle is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies for upper crossed syndrome patients. This study seeks to provide evidence-based guidance to clinicians regarding the most effective therapeutic approach. Considering the high prevalence of Upper Cross syndrome in the modern world, this study aims to check the effects of METs versus cervical and scapula-thoracic stabilization exercises on pain, disability and craniovertebral angle in patients with Upper Cross syndrome.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Upper Cross Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Muscle Energy Technique

Intervention Type OTHER

Eccentric muscle energy technique was applied to subjects' cervical spine. The cervical spine will brought to the barrier of motion in each plane i.e. flexion/extension, lateral bending and rotation. Then subjects will asked to push their heads into the direction opposite that of the barrier. The therapist provided isometric resistance for 3- 5 seconds, after which the subjects relaxed their muscles completely and the therapist applied stretch.

Group B

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Eccentric muscle energy technique

Intervention Type OTHER

Eccentric muscle energy technique was applied to subjects' cervical spine. The cervical spine will brought to the barrier of motion in each plane i.e. flexion/extension, lateral bending and rotation. Then subjects will asked to push their heads into the direction opposite that of the barrier. The therapist provided isometric resistance for 3- 5 seconds, after which the subjects relaxed their muscles completely and the therapist applied stretch. Three to five repetitions will performed.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Muscle Energy Technique

Eccentric muscle energy technique was applied to subjects' cervical spine. The cervical spine will brought to the barrier of motion in each plane i.e. flexion/extension, lateral bending and rotation. Then subjects will asked to push their heads into the direction opposite that of the barrier. The therapist provided isometric resistance for 3- 5 seconds, after which the subjects relaxed their muscles completely and the therapist applied stretch.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eccentric muscle energy technique

Eccentric muscle energy technique was applied to subjects' cervical spine. The cervical spine will brought to the barrier of motion in each plane i.e. flexion/extension, lateral bending and rotation. Then subjects will asked to push their heads into the direction opposite that of the barrier. The therapist provided isometric resistance for 3- 5 seconds, after which the subjects relaxed their muscles completely and the therapist applied stretch. Three to five repetitions will performed.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Both gender diagnosed with upper crossed syndrome
* Patient having neck pain of 4 to 12 weeks
* Pain reported on NRPS score ˃6/10 in the neck region
* Subjects agree to sign the written consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

* Tuberculosis, carcinoma, heart disease, and osteoporosis
* Neural disorders due to prolapsed intervertebral disc
* Any trauma or localized infection in neck region
* Upper motor neuron disease, cervical stenosis, and metabolic diseases in bone and joint
* Hyper flexibility
* Open sores
* Ongoing radiotherapy, chemotherapy, steroid therapy, or anticoagulants
* Psychiatric diseases such as phobia/obsession and depression
* Allergy to hot pack
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Riphah International University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Danish Hassan, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Riphah International University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Riphah Rehabilitation Clinic

Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Syed Shakil ur Rehman, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+92 345 7946009

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Syed Shakil ur Rehman, PhD

Role: primary

+92 320 7866611

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mujawar JC, Sagar JH. Prevalence of Upper Cross Syndrome in Laundry Workers. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2019 Jan-Apr;23(1):54-56. doi: 10.4103/ijoem.IJOEM_169_18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31040591 (View on PubMed)

Chang MC, Choo YJ, Hong K, Boudier-Reveret M, Yang S. Treatment of Upper Crossed Syndrome: A Narrative Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 17;11(16):2328. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162328.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37628525 (View on PubMed)

Ali S, Ahmad S, Jalal Y, Shah B. Effectiveness of Stretching Exercises Versus Muscle Energy Techniques in the Management of Upper Cross Syndrome: JRCRS. 2017; 5 (1): 12-16. Journal Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences. 2017;5(1):12-6

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Jaazba- REC/RCR&AHS 24/0137

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.