Effects of Biofeedback-Guided Training on Muscle Strength and Postural Alignment in Upper Cross Syndrome.

NCT ID: NCT07026084

Last Updated: 2025-08-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

56 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-08-11

Study Completion Date

2026-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized controlled trial investigates the effects of biofeedback-guided training versus conventional therapy on muscle strength and postural alignment in patients with Upper Cross Syndrome. The study includes adults aged 25-45 years meeting diagnostic criteria for UCS, such as weak deep cervical flexors, restricted cervical ROM, forward head posture, increased thoracic kyphosis, and chronic neck pain \>3 months. Participants are divided into two groups: Group A biofeedback training and Group B conventional therapy, receiving 12 sessions over 4 weeks ,3sessions/week. Assessments are conducted at baseline, post-1st session, and weekly intervals using standardized measures.The study aims to compare the efficacy of biofeedback-guided training in improving strength and posture in UCS patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Prolonged sitting and repetitive movements, common in desk jobs, poor ergonomics, and sedentary lifestyles, can lead to poor posture, discomfort, pain, and muscle or joint disability. A frequent result of poor posture is Upper Cross Syndrome, characterized by imbalances between upper body muscle groups. In Upper Cross Syndrome, overactive muscles like the pectoralis major, upper trapezius, and levator scapulae become tight, while the deep neck flexors, middle and lower trapezius, serratus anterior, and rhomboids weaken, disrupting movement patterns and increasing injury risk. Dr. Janda's 1988 model categorized muscles into postural (tonic) muscles, prone to tightness, and phasic muscles, prone to weakness. Upper cross Syndrome commonly causes neck, shoulder, and upper back pain, along with discomfort in the shoulder blades and neck stiffness.

Upper Cross Syndrome symptoms include neck, shoulder, and upper back pain, and can lead to forward head posture , increased thoracic kyphosis, and loss of cervical lordosis. Forward head posture, seen in 60% of individuals aged 20 to 50, causes neck strain, reduced mobility, and pain. With the rise of technology use, Upper cross syndrome has become more prevalent. Individuals often lean forward to view screens, exacerbating posture-related issues. Studies show Upper cross syndrome prevalence in IT professionals (67%), students (37.1%) and laundry workers (28%). Prevalence across different groups ranges from 11% to 60%. This condition leads to pain, discomfort, and reduced quality of life, prompting the need for effective treatment.

Effective manual therapy techniques for treating Upper Cross Syndrome aim to alleviate muscle tension, improve mobility, and correct postural imbalances. These include joint mobilization and manipulation, which restore normal motion and reduce pain, and soft tissue mobilization techniques like myofascial release and trigger point therapy that target tight muscles to enhance blood flow and reduce tension. Active Release Techniques identify and release muscle adhesions through specific movements and therapist-applied pressure, while transverse massage uses friction across muscle fibers to break down adhesions and promote healing. Post-Isometric Relaxation helps enhance flexibility and reduce tightness by contracting and stretching muscles, and neuro-mobilization addresses nerve entrapments commonly associated with Upper cross syndrome to alleviate pain.

A growing body of research has explored the effectiveness of various interventions for managing Upper cross syndrome, including manual therapy, and biofeedback-guided strength training. Karthi et al. found that motor control training of deep neck flexors using pressure biofeedback significantly reduced pain and disability, highlighting the efficacy of biofeedback in improving muscle activation and posture. Similarly, Ashfaq et al. demonstrated that cranio-cervical flexion training with biofeedback enhanced muscular endurance and reduced neck pain more effectively than conventional methods. These findings align with the clinical utility of biofeedback in correcting postural imbalances, a key feature of UCS. In addition, ART, which targets muscle adhesions and soft tissue dysfunction, has shown promise in improving range of motion and alleviating pain in UCS patients (Kang et al., 2016).Manual therapy techniques like joint mobilization and soft tissue manipulation are also effective in restoring normal movement patterns and reducing discomfort. Gumuscu et al. further supported these findings by showing that combining conventional program i.e. stabilization exercises with stretching and strengthening improved posture and respiratory function in office workers with forward head posture, suggesting that integrated approaches could enhance outcomes in Upper cross syndrome management.

Strength training has been widely used to correct Upper cross syndrome by targeting weak muscle groups, particularly DCFs. Studies have shown that resistance exercises can significantly improve posture and reduce associated pain by enhancing muscle endurance and correcting imbalances. However, conventional strength training lacks real-time feedback mechanisms, not providing neuromuscular control, potentially leading to compensatory movements and suboptimal outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Upper Extremity Problem Muscle Weakness Postural Kyphosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

comparison based study on effects of bio feedback guided training and conventional exercise prorocol on muscle strength and postural training in upper cross syndrome
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
Participants will be masked by using sealed envolpe method

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental Group

Biofeedback-Guided Strength Training:

Hot Pack: Applied for 10 minutes, mild warmth sensation to relax muscles and prepare for exercise.

1\. BPU (Biofeedback Pressure Unit): performed at 5 pressure levels (22, 24, 26, 28, 30 mmHg).

Each level involves a 10-second hold, with 30 seconds rest between levels.

Targeted muscles:

* Deep Cervical Flexors (Capitus Longus, Capitus Colli).
* Rhomboids
* Trapezius Total duration (BPU): 20 minutes/session, performed 3 times/week.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bio feedback training

Intervention Type OTHER

Hot Pack: Applied for 10 minutes, mild warmth sensation to relax muscles and prepare for exercise.

1\. BPU (Biofeedback Pressure Unit): performed at 5 pressure levels (22, 24, 26, 28, 30 mmHg).

Each level involves a 10-second hold, with 30 seconds rest between levels.

Targeted muscles:

* Deep Cervical Flexors (Capitus Longus, Capitus Colli).
* Rhomboids
* Trapezius Total duration (BPU): 20 minutes/session, performed 3 times/week.

Control Group

Conventional Therapy:

Hot Pack: Applied for 10 minutes, mild warmth sensation to relax muscles and prepare for exercise.

EXERCISE PROGRAM:

* 1\. Supine: Neck curl with Chin Tucks (Deep Cervical Flexors Capitus Longus, Capitus Colli): 10 reps/session, holding each for 5 seconds.
* 2\. Sitting: Chin tuck with Head pushing against palm.
* 3\. Chin Up (Middle and Lower Trapezius): 10 reps/session, holding each for 5 seconds.
* 4\. Scapular Squeezes (Rhomboids): 2-3 sets of 10 reps/session, holding each for 5 seconds
* 5\. Doorway Pectoral Stretch (pect major) 2-3 reps, 30 sec hold (36) Total duration: 20 minutes/session, performed 3 times/week.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

conventional exercise program

Intervention Type OTHER

Hot Pack: Applied for 10 minutes, mild warmth sensation to relax muscles and prepare for exercise.

EXERCISE PROGRAM:

* 1\. Supine: Neck curl with Chin Tucks (Deep Cervical Flexors Capitus Longus, Capitus Colli): 10 reps/session, holding each for 5 seconds.
* 2\. Sitting: Chin tuck with Head pushing against palm.
* 3\. Chin Up (Middle and Lower Trapezius): 10 reps/session, holding each for 5 seconds.
* 4\. Scapular Squeezes (Rhomboids): 2-3 sets of 10 reps/session, holding each for 5 seconds• 5. Doorway Pectoral Stretch (pect major) 2-3 reps, 30 sec hold (36)Total duration: 20 minutes/session, performed 3 times/week.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bio feedback training

Hot Pack: Applied for 10 minutes, mild warmth sensation to relax muscles and prepare for exercise.

1\. BPU (Biofeedback Pressure Unit): performed at 5 pressure levels (22, 24, 26, 28, 30 mmHg).

Each level involves a 10-second hold, with 30 seconds rest between levels.

Targeted muscles:

* Deep Cervical Flexors (Capitus Longus, Capitus Colli).
* Rhomboids
* Trapezius Total duration (BPU): 20 minutes/session, performed 3 times/week.

Intervention Type OTHER

conventional exercise program

Hot Pack: Applied for 10 minutes, mild warmth sensation to relax muscles and prepare for exercise.

EXERCISE PROGRAM:

* 1\. Supine: Neck curl with Chin Tucks (Deep Cervical Flexors Capitus Longus, Capitus Colli): 10 reps/session, holding each for 5 seconds.
* 2\. Sitting: Chin tuck with Head pushing against palm.
* 3\. Chin Up (Middle and Lower Trapezius): 10 reps/session, holding each for 5 seconds.
* 4\. Scapular Squeezes (Rhomboids): 2-3 sets of 10 reps/session, holding each for 5 seconds• 5. Doorway Pectoral Stretch (pect major) 2-3 reps, 30 sec hold (36)Total duration: 20 minutes/session, performed 3 times/week.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* • Adults aged 25-45 years with both genders.

* Individuals meeting the following diagnostic criteria for upper cross syndrome will be included:
* Reduced strength of deep cervical flexors = unable to maintain pressure beyond 22-24 mm Hg (assessed via cranio-cervical flexion test).
* Limited cervical range of motion (Flexion: \< 80 degrees, Extension: \< 70 degrees, Rotation: \< 90 degrees on both sides, Lateral Flexion: \< 20 degrees)
* Postural deviations: forward head posture (CVA \<50 degrees), increased thoracic kyphosis (via flexi curve \>45 degrees).
* Neck pain with a duration of over 3 months

Exclusion Criteria

* • History of recent neck surgery or injury.

* Patients with neurological disorders affecting muscle tone.
* Involvement in other physical therapy programs focused on UCS.
* Diagnosed musculoskeletal condition that could impact muscle performance.
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Riphah International University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Aisha Razzaq, PHD*

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Riphah International University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Watch Guard Tech

Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

IMRAN AMJAD, PHD

Role: CONTACT

0332430125

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Aisha Razzaq, PHD*

Role: primary

03015030784

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Riphah IU Shizra Tayyab

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.