Planned Delivery at 37 Versus 36 Weeks in Pregnancies With Placenta Previaand Accreta
NCT ID: NCT07025954
Last Updated: 2025-07-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
600 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-07-12
2027-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Labor Induction in Preeclampsia High-risk Women
NCT05056467
Cerclage for Prevention on Preterm Birth in Women With Placenta Previa
NCT01442207
Premature Rupture of Membranes at 34 to 37 Weeks' Gestation
NCT03689062
Aspiration Technique-based Device for Preterm Labor
NCT05355649
A Pilot RCT on the Management of Term Prelabour Rupture of Membranes
NCT02872883
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
37-week group
Subjects were randomized 1:1 at 28-34 weeks. 37-week group: planned delivery at 37 0/7-37 6/7 weeksof gestation.
Cesarean delivery
All patients were delivered via cesarean section with standardized perioperative management, including preoperative preparation (e.g., autologous bloodreserve, corticosteroid administration for foetal lungmaturation, etc.), surgical approach, and postoperative care.
Conservative management (intentional placental retention in situ with local resection and pelvic devascularization) was primarily employed, while peripartum hysterectomy was reserved for those with extensive invasion or failed conservative treatment.
36-week group
Subjects were randomized 1:1 at 28-34 weeks. 36-week group: planned delivery at 36 0/7-36 6/7 weeksof gestation.
Cesarean delivery
All patients were delivered via cesarean section with standardized perioperative management, including preoperative preparation (e.g., autologous bloodreserve, corticosteroid administration for foetal lungmaturation, etc.), surgical approach, and postoperative care.
Conservative management (intentional placental retention in situ with local resection and pelvic devascularization) was primarily employed, while peripartum hysterectomy was reserved for those with extensive invasion or failed conservative treatment.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cesarean delivery
All patients were delivered via cesarean section with standardized perioperative management, including preoperative preparation (e.g., autologous bloodreserve, corticosteroid administration for foetal lungmaturation, etc.), surgical approach, and postoperative care.
Conservative management (intentional placental retention in situ with local resection and pelvic devascularization) was primarily employed, while peripartum hysterectomy was reserved for those with extensive invasion or failed conservative treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Both ultrasound and MRI indicate placenta previa with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).
* Planned to undergo cesarean delivery at the participating study hospitals.
* Agree to participate and sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
* Other obstetric complications (e.g., preeclampsia, vasa previa), and severe maternal medical conditions (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, progressive cardiovascular disease, active systemic lupus erythematosus, liver cirrhosis).
* Major uterine structural anomalies (e.g., uterine didelphys, Uterine tumors ≥5 cm).
* Estimated fetal weight \<3rd percentile for gestational age, major congenital anomalies, intrauterine fetal demise.
18 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
wangzhijian
Professor, MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Zhijian Wang, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Zhengzhou, Henan, China
West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, , China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Chongqing, , China
Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center
Guangzhou, , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB(2025)-061
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.