A Phase III Efficacy and Safety Study of Intravenous Retosiban Versus Placebo for Women in Spontaneous Preterm Labor
NCT ID: NCT02377466
Last Updated: 2020-07-28
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-02-29
2017-07-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Randomized Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Retosiban Versus Atosiban for Women in Spontaneous Preterm Labour
NCT02292771
Follow up Study to Assess Long Term Safety and Outcomes in Infants and Children Born to Mothers Participating in Retosiban Treatment Studies
NCT02292784
Confirmatory Study of 17P vs Vehicle for Prevention of Preterm Birth in Women w/ Previous Spontaneous Preterm Delivery
NCT01004029
Study to Investigate the Pharmacokinetics (PK), Safety and Tolerability of Retosiban in Healthy Japanese Women
NCT02377414
The Safety, Tolerability And Metabolism Of GSK221149A, In Pregnant Women (30-36 Weeks), In Pre-Term Labor
NCT00404768
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Retosiban
Retosiban treatment will be administered as a 6 mg IV loading dose over 5 minutes followed by a 6 milligram per hour (mg/hour) continuous infusion over 48 hours. For subjects with an inadequate response after the first hour of treatment, another 6 mg loading dose will be administered and infusion rate will be increased to 12 mg/hour for the remainder of the 48 hour treatment period. The retosiban dosing regimen will require adjustment in subjects treated concomitantly with drugs that are strong Cytochrome 3A4 inhibitors or inducers.
Retosiban IV infusion
Retosiban for IV administration will be supplied as solution for infusion, consisting of a clear colorless solution of retosiban at a concentration of 15 milligram per milliliter (mg/mL).
Placebo
The placebo control will be a normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride \[NaCl\]) infusion matched for the loading dose and continuous infusion rates, including a dose increase in subjects with an inadequate response after the first hour of treatment.
Placebo IV infusion
0.9% NaCl matched for the retosiban loading dose and continuous infusion rates
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Retosiban IV infusion
Retosiban for IV administration will be supplied as solution for infusion, consisting of a clear colorless solution of retosiban at a concentration of 15 milligram per milliliter (mg/mL).
Placebo IV infusion
0.9% NaCl matched for the retosiban loading dose and continuous infusion rates
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Females aged 12 to 45 years, with an uncomplicated, singleton pregnancy and intact membranes in preterm.
* Gestational age between 24 and 33 weeks as determined by (1) known fertilization date, either in vitro fertilization or intrauterine insemination, (2) last menstrual period confirmed by the earliest ultrasound prior to 24 weeks gestation, or (3) the earliest ultrasound alone prior to 24 weeks gestation, whichever is the most accurate method available for each subject. In situations where prenatal ultrasound records are not available at the time the subject presents, the investigator will make every effort to obtain these records (either via computer records, directly from the subject's primary care obstetrician, or via telephone). However, in cases in which these records are not readily available (e.g., off hours, holiday), it is within the investigator's discretion to use GA based on a verbal history from the subject with the intent of getting confirmation from the medical records as soon as possible.
* Females must be diagnosed with preterm labor according to both of the following criteria: a) Regular uterine contractions at a rate of \>=4 contractions of at least 30 seconds' duration during a 30-minute interval confirmed by tocodynamometry and at least 1 of the following, b) Cervical dilation \>=2 centimeter (cm) and \<=4 cm by digital cervical examination or c) If \<2 cm dilation by digital cervical examination, a cervical change consisting of an increase of at least 25% effacement or 1-cm dilation.
* Current or past tocolytic treatment as follows: a) Subjects in whom tocolytic treatment has not been initiated prior to consent are eligible for the study, b) Transferred or referred subjects for whom parenteral magnesium sulfate treatment has been started before Screening are eligible provided they meet all eligibility criteria, c) Subjects receiving a prohibited tocolytic in this study are eligible only if the treatment is stopped before randomization and provided they meet all eligibility criteria, d) Subjects with a historical failure of a tocolytic treatment in a previous episode of preterm labor during the current pregnancy are eligible provided they meet all eligibility criteria.
Exclusion Criteria
* Women with maternal-fetal conditions that potentially necessitate the need for delivery, such as pre-eclampsia or fetal compromise.
* A fetus with any diagnosis, condition, treatment, or other factor that in the opinion of the investigator has the potential to affect or confound assessments of efficacy or safety (for example: nonreassuring fetal status, intrauterine growth restriction, major congenital anomaly).
* Preterm premature rupture of membranes.
* Women with any confirmed or suspected contraindication to prolongation of pregnancy, such as placental abruption, chorioamnionitis, or placenta previa.
* Evidence of polyhydramnios (AFI \>25 cm) or oligohydramnios (AFI \<5 cm).
* Women with co-morbid medical or obstetric conditions that in the opinion of the investigator have the potential to complicate the pregnancy course and outcomes, such as uncontrolled hypertension or uncontrolled diabetes (if known, history of glycosylated hemoglobin \>8% at any time during pregnancy), or compromise the safety of the subject, such as underlying cardiovascular disorder (specifically ischemic cardiac disease, congenital heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, valvular heart disease, arrhythmias, and cardiomyopathy).
* Women with a history of substance abuse during the pregnancy or urine drug screen positive for cocaine, phencyclidine (PCP), methamphetamine, or amphetamine.
* Women in whom the combination of history and screening test results is suggestive of abuse or dependency that may have the potential to complicate the pregnancy outcome.
* Women with any diagnosis, condition, treatment, or other factor that, in the opinion of the investigator, has the potential to affect or confound assessments of efficacy or safety.
* Current active liver or biliary disease (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones or otherwise stable chronic liver disease per investigator assessment).
* History of sensitivity to any of the investigational products (IPs) or components thereof or a history of drug or other allergy that, in the opinion of the investigator or GlaxoSmithKline/ Pharmaceutical Product Development (GSK/PPD) medical monitor, contraindicates the subject's participation.
12 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
PPD Development, LP
INDUSTRY
GlaxoSmithKline
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
GSK Clinical Trials
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
GlaxoSmithKline
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
GSK Investigational Site
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Mobile, Alabama, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Tucson, Arizona, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Colton, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Orange, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Augusta, Georgia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Columbus, Georgia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Maywood, Illinois, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Park Ridge, Illinois, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
GSK Investigational Site
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Jackson, Mississippi, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Richmond Heights, Missouri, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Neptune City, New Jersey, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Newark, New Jersey, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Brooklyn, New York, United States
GSK Investigational Site
New York, New York, United States
GSK Investigational Site
The Bronx, New York, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Durham, North Carolina, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Dayton, Ohio, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Portland, Oregon, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Galveston, Texas, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Tacoma, Washington, United States
GSK Investigational Site
London, Ontario, Canada
GSK Investigational Site
Rome, Lazio, Italy
GSK Investigational Site
Milan, Lombardy, Italy
GSK Investigational Site
Hokkaido, , Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Hyōgo, , Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Kagoshima, , Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Miyagi, , Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Miyazaki, , Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Nagasaki, , Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Okinawa, , Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Saitama, , Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Tochigi, , Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Tokyo, , Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Tokyo, , Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Tokyo, , Japan
GSK Investigational Site
Tokyo, , Japan
GSK Investigational Site
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014-003326-41
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
200719
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.