A Phase III Efficacy and Safety Study of Intravenous Retosiban Versus Placebo for Women in Spontaneous Preterm Labor

NCT ID: NCT02377466

Last Updated: 2020-07-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

25 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-02-29

Study Completion Date

2017-07-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study's primary objective is to demonstrate the superiority of retosiban to prolong pregnancy and improve neonatal outcomes compared with placebo. It is a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study and will be conducted in approximately 900 females, aged 12 to 45 years, with an uncomplicated, singleton pregnancy and intact membranes in preterm labor between 24\^0/7 and 33\^6/7 weeks of gestation. Eligible maternal subjects will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either retosiban IV infusion or placebo IV infusion over 48 hours. If not previously administered, antenatal corticosteroid treatment should be administered as either (1) two 12-mg doses of betamethasone given intramuscularly 24 hours apart or (2) four 6-mg doses of betamethasone administered intramuscularly every 12 hours. A single rescue course of antenatal corticosteroids is permitted if the antecedent treatment was at least 7 days prior to study enrolment. Investigators have discretion to use a standardized regimen of magnesium sulphate, as well as intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for perinatal group B streptococcal infection. Prior to randomization, each subject will be stratified by progesterone treatment and gestational age. The progesterone strata will consist of subjects on established progesterone therapy or subjects not on established progesterone therapy at Screening. The study will comprise 6 phases: Screening, Inpatient Randomized Treatment, Post Infusion Assessment, Delivery, Maternal Post-Delivery Assessment, and Neonatal Medical Review. The duration of any subject's (maternal or neonatal) participation in the study will be variable and dependent on gestational ages (GA) at study entry and the date of delivery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Obstetric Labour, Premature

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Retosiban

Retosiban treatment will be administered as a 6 mg IV loading dose over 5 minutes followed by a 6 milligram per hour (mg/hour) continuous infusion over 48 hours. For subjects with an inadequate response after the first hour of treatment, another 6 mg loading dose will be administered and infusion rate will be increased to 12 mg/hour for the remainder of the 48 hour treatment period. The retosiban dosing regimen will require adjustment in subjects treated concomitantly with drugs that are strong Cytochrome 3A4 inhibitors or inducers.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Retosiban IV infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Retosiban for IV administration will be supplied as solution for infusion, consisting of a clear colorless solution of retosiban at a concentration of 15 milligram per milliliter (mg/mL).

Placebo

The placebo control will be a normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride \[NaCl\]) infusion matched for the loading dose and continuous infusion rates, including a dose increase in subjects with an inadequate response after the first hour of treatment.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo IV infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

0.9% NaCl matched for the retosiban loading dose and continuous infusion rates

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Retosiban IV infusion

Retosiban for IV administration will be supplied as solution for infusion, consisting of a clear colorless solution of retosiban at a concentration of 15 milligram per milliliter (mg/mL).

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo IV infusion

0.9% NaCl matched for the retosiban loading dose and continuous infusion rates

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Signed and dated written informed consent is required prior to a subject's participation in the study and the performance of any protocol specific procedures. Adolescents aged 12 to 17 years must provide written agreement to participate in the study in accordance with applicable regulatory and country or state requirements. Subjects will also be asked to sign a release for medical records at the time of consenting to allow access to both the maternal and neonatal records including information about delivery and infant care as well as information collected prior to the consent having been signed.
* Females aged 12 to 45 years, with an uncomplicated, singleton pregnancy and intact membranes in preterm.
* Gestational age between 24 and 33 weeks as determined by (1) known fertilization date, either in vitro fertilization or intrauterine insemination, (2) last menstrual period confirmed by the earliest ultrasound prior to 24 weeks gestation, or (3) the earliest ultrasound alone prior to 24 weeks gestation, whichever is the most accurate method available for each subject. In situations where prenatal ultrasound records are not available at the time the subject presents, the investigator will make every effort to obtain these records (either via computer records, directly from the subject's primary care obstetrician, or via telephone). However, in cases in which these records are not readily available (e.g., off hours, holiday), it is within the investigator's discretion to use GA based on a verbal history from the subject with the intent of getting confirmation from the medical records as soon as possible.
* Females must be diagnosed with preterm labor according to both of the following criteria: a) Regular uterine contractions at a rate of \>=4 contractions of at least 30 seconds' duration during a 30-minute interval confirmed by tocodynamometry and at least 1 of the following, b) Cervical dilation \>=2 centimeter (cm) and \<=4 cm by digital cervical examination or c) If \<2 cm dilation by digital cervical examination, a cervical change consisting of an increase of at least 25% effacement or 1-cm dilation.
* Current or past tocolytic treatment as follows: a) Subjects in whom tocolytic treatment has not been initiated prior to consent are eligible for the study, b) Transferred or referred subjects for whom parenteral magnesium sulfate treatment has been started before Screening are eligible provided they meet all eligibility criteria, c) Subjects receiving a prohibited tocolytic in this study are eligible only if the treatment is stopped before randomization and provided they meet all eligibility criteria, d) Subjects with a historical failure of a tocolytic treatment in a previous episode of preterm labor during the current pregnancy are eligible provided they meet all eligibility criteria.

Exclusion Criteria

* Fever with a temperature \>100.4 degree Fahrenheit (38 degree centigrade) for more than 1 hour or \>=101 degree Fahrenheit (38.3 degree centigrade) in the 24 hours prior to the start of study treatment.
* Women with maternal-fetal conditions that potentially necessitate the need for delivery, such as pre-eclampsia or fetal compromise.
* A fetus with any diagnosis, condition, treatment, or other factor that in the opinion of the investigator has the potential to affect or confound assessments of efficacy or safety (for example: nonreassuring fetal status, intrauterine growth restriction, major congenital anomaly).
* Preterm premature rupture of membranes.
* Women with any confirmed or suspected contraindication to prolongation of pregnancy, such as placental abruption, chorioamnionitis, or placenta previa.
* Evidence of polyhydramnios (AFI \>25 cm) or oligohydramnios (AFI \<5 cm).
* Women with co-morbid medical or obstetric conditions that in the opinion of the investigator have the potential to complicate the pregnancy course and outcomes, such as uncontrolled hypertension or uncontrolled diabetes (if known, history of glycosylated hemoglobin \>8% at any time during pregnancy), or compromise the safety of the subject, such as underlying cardiovascular disorder (specifically ischemic cardiac disease, congenital heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, valvular heart disease, arrhythmias, and cardiomyopathy).
* Women with a history of substance abuse during the pregnancy or urine drug screen positive for cocaine, phencyclidine (PCP), methamphetamine, or amphetamine.
* Women in whom the combination of history and screening test results is suggestive of abuse or dependency that may have the potential to complicate the pregnancy outcome.
* Women with any diagnosis, condition, treatment, or other factor that, in the opinion of the investigator, has the potential to affect or confound assessments of efficacy or safety.
* Current active liver or biliary disease (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones or otherwise stable chronic liver disease per investigator assessment).
* History of sensitivity to any of the investigational products (IPs) or components thereof or a history of drug or other allergy that, in the opinion of the investigator or GlaxoSmithKline/ Pharmaceutical Product Development (GSK/PPD) medical monitor, contraindicates the subject's participation.
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

PPD Development, LP

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

GlaxoSmithKline

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

GSK Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

GlaxoSmithKline

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

GSK Investigational Site

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Colton, California, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Columbus, Georgia, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Maywood, Illinois, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Park Ridge, Illinois, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Richmond Heights, Missouri, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Neptune City, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Galveston, Texas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Rome, Lazio, Italy

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Milan, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Hokkaido, , Japan

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Hyōgo, , Japan

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Kagoshima, , Japan

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Miyagi, , Japan

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Miyazaki, , Japan

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Nagasaki, , Japan

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Okinawa, , Japan

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Saitama, , Japan

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Tochigi, , Japan

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada Italy Japan United Kingdom

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014-003326-41

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

200719

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effectiveness of ACS in Extreme Preemies
NCT02351310 WITHDRAWN PHASE3