Effect of Two Incision Techniques on Soft and Hard Tissue Outcomes in Immediate Implant Placement in Class II Extraction Sockets of the Esthetic Zone:

NCT ID: NCT07020767

Last Updated: 2025-06-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

48 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-01

Study Completion Date

2025-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized controlled clinical trial investigates the effect of two different surgical approaches-Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST) and Flap Elevation Technique-on soft and hard tissue outcomes during immediate implant placement in Class II extraction sockets of the anterior maxilla (esthetic zone). The study enrolled 26 systemically healthy adult patients contributing a total of 48 surgical sites. Each site was randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups.

The VST group employed a minimally invasive vestibular incision to allow atraumatic extraction, implant placement, bone grafting, and membrane placement while preserving the labial soft tissue and periosteal blood supply. The Flap Elevation group followed a conventional intrasulcular flap approach. In both groups, implants were placed with 30 Ncm torque and augmented with MegaOss™ allograft and a resorbable collagen membrane (T-barrier™).

Clinical and radiographic evaluations were conducted at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months post-loading. Outcomes measured included Pink Esthetic Score (PES), peri-implant probing depth (PD), mucosal level changes, and crestal bone level changes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Tooth extraction in the anterior maxilla, particularly in the esthetic zone, often leads to substantial resorption of the alveolar ridge, predominantly affecting the thin buccal bone plate. Studies have shown that up to 50% of horizontal ridge width can be lost within 6 months of extraction, compromising both soft tissue contours and the feasibility of future implant placement (Araújo \& Lindhe, 2005; Schropp, Wenzel, Kostopoulos, \& Karring, 2003). This resorption has profound esthetic and functional implications, especially in patients with high smile lines or thin periodontal biotypes.

To address these challenges, immediate implant placement was introduced to reduce treatment time, preserve socket dimensions, and optimize soft tissue outcomes (Kan, Rungcharassaeng, Umezu, \& Kois, 2003; Lang, Pun, Lau, Li, \& Wong, 2012). While immediate implants help maintain the overall ridge profile, they do not fully prevent bone remodeling of the buccal plate, which often results in soft tissue recession and compromised esthetic outcomes (Botticelli, Berglundh, Buser, \& Lindhe, 2003; Chen \& Buser, 2014).

Flap design during implant surgery has been identified as a critical factor influencing peri-implant bone and soft tissue healing. The traditional flap elevation approach provides good visibility but disrupts the periosteal blood supply, increasing the risk of bone resorption and soft tissue shrinkage (Fickl et al., 2008; Jeong et al., 2007). By contrast, flapless surgery preserves the periosteal blood supply and minimizes soft tissue trauma, leading to superior bone preservation and reduced postoperative discomfort (Becker, Goldstein, Becker, \& Sennerby, 2005; Oh, Shotwell, Billy, \& Wang, 2006). However, flapless techniques carry limitations such as reduced access and increased risk of malpositioning the implant or causing thermal bone damage without adequate irrigation (Choudhary et al., 2023).

To overcome the limitations of both approaches, Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST) was developed as a minimally invasive technique that allows simultaneous atraumatic extraction, implant placement, and socket augmentation through a small vestibular access incision (A. Elaskary et al., 2023). VST preserves the integrity of the labial soft tissues and periosteal blood supply, improves labial bone support, and enables simultaneous use of bone grafts and membranes to enhance both hard and soft tissue outcomes (Ghallab et al., 2023). Clinical trials comparing VST to conventional incisal extraction or partial extraction therapy (PET) have demonstrated comparable or superior outcomes in terms of Pink Esthetic Score (PES), soft tissue volume preservation, and facial bone thickness (A. Elaskary et al., 2023; Hamed et al., 2023).

Bone grafting materials used in combination with immediate implants have also been extensively studied. While autogenous bone has been considered the gold standard, it is often limited by donor site morbidity. Alternatives such as deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM), demineralized bone matrix (DBM), and collagen plugs have been successfully used to fill peri-implant defects and support labial bone regeneration (Araújo \& Lindhe, 2005; Artzi, Tal, \& Dayan, 2000; Jensen \& Terheyden, 2009). Randomized controlled trials have shown that using a combination of autogenous bone chips with DBBM (e.g., MinerOss X) significantly increases facial bone thickness compared to collagen plug or DBM alone (Hamed et al., 2023).

Moreover, the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) has become a standard metric to assess esthetic outcomes around implants, evaluating parameters such as mesial and distal papilla fill, soft tissue level and contour, alveolar process deficiency, and tissue color and texture (Fürhauser et al., 2005). Studies have consistently shown that minimally invasive approaches, like VST and PET, score highly on PES, reflecting superior esthetic outcomes (Cosyn et al., 2011; Evans \& Chen, 2008).

Vestibular socket therapy (VST) has emerged as a promising minimally invasive approach for preserving soft and hard tissue architecture during immediate implant placement, particularly in challenging esthetic zones. However, its clinical performance compared to conventional flap elevation remains underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of VST combined with Allograft and collagen membrane in enhancing esthetic outcomes, soft tissue stability, and bone preservation advancing minimally invasive protocols toward more predictable, patient-centered care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Immediate Dental Implant Tooth Extraction Class II Extraction Sockets Esthetic Zone Implantology

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Model Description (Additional Details):

Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two parallel groups:

Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST) Group: Minimally invasive implant placement via vestibular access with bone grafting and collagen membrane.

Flap Elevation Group: Conventional mucoperiosteal flap technique with the same implant and grafting protocol.

Each surgical site (maximum of two per patient) was independently randomized. Outcome assessors and statisticians were blinded to group allocation to reduce bias. The trial aimed to evaluate differences in esthetic and tissue stability outcomes over a 12-month period.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The study employed single masking, where the clinical outcome assessors, radiographic evaluators, and statisticians were blinded to group assignments. The operating surgeon was not blinded due to the nature of the surgical procedures. Allocation concealment was ensured using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST) Group

Participants in this group underwent immediate implant placement using Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST). A minimally invasive vestibular incision was made, followed by atraumatic extraction, implant placement (BioHorizons, 30 Ncm), bone grafting with MegaOss™ allograft, and placement of a T-barrier™ collagen membrane. The membrane was stabilized with tacks, and the site was closed with 7/0 nylon sutures. Healing was supported by customized composite healing abutments, and final zirconia crowns were delivered at 3 months.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST) Group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A minimally invasive vestibular incision technique for atraumatic tooth extraction, followed by immediate implant placement using BioHorizons implants. The socket is augmented with MegaOss™ allograft and covered with T-barrier™ collagen membrane, stabilized with membrane tacks. Soft tissue closure is achieved with 7/0 nylon sutures. Customized composite healing abutments are used, and zirconia crowns are delivered at 3 months.

Flap Elevation Group

Participants in this group received immediate implant placement using a conventional mucoperiosteal flap elevation approach. After intrasulcular and vertical incisions, atraumatic extraction was followed by implant placement (BioHorizons, 30 Ncm), grafting with MegaOss™ allograft, and coverage with a T-barrier™ collagen membrane, stabilized with tacks. The site was closed with 7/0 nylon sutures, and healing was supported with customized composite healing abutments. Final zirconia crowns were placed at 3 months.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Flap Elevation Group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Traditional mucoperiosteal flap elevation with intrasulcular and vertical incisions, followed by atraumatic extraction and immediate implant placement using BioHorizons implants. The socket is grafted with MegaOss™ allograft, covered with T-barrier™ collagen membrane, and stabilized with tacks. The site is closed with 7/0 nylon sutures. Healing abutments and zirconia crowns are applied following the same timeline as the VST group.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST) Group

A minimally invasive vestibular incision technique for atraumatic tooth extraction, followed by immediate implant placement using BioHorizons implants. The socket is augmented with MegaOss™ allograft and covered with T-barrier™ collagen membrane, stabilized with membrane tacks. Soft tissue closure is achieved with 7/0 nylon sutures. Customized composite healing abutments are used, and zirconia crowns are delivered at 3 months.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Flap Elevation Group

Traditional mucoperiosteal flap elevation with intrasulcular and vertical incisions, followed by atraumatic extraction and immediate implant placement using BioHorizons implants. The socket is grafted with MegaOss™ allograft, covered with T-barrier™ collagen membrane, and stabilized with tacks. The site is closed with 7/0 nylon sutures. Healing abutments and zirconia crowns are applied following the same timeline as the VST group.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults aged 20 to 50 years.

Presence of one or more non-restorable or remaining roots in the maxillary anterior region (canine to canine).

Class II extraction sockets confirmed by CBCT.

Sufficient apical and palatal bone to ensure proper implant positioning and primary stability.

Good compliance with treatment visits and oral hygiene.

Medically healthy with no systemic diseases affecting wound healing or implant success.

Exclusion Criteria

* Systemic conditions that contraindicate implant or periodontal surgery (e.g., immunocompromised, uncontrolled systemic disease).

Smokers, diabetics, or pregnant/lactating women.

History of chemotherapy or radiotherapy in the head and/or neck region.

Patients on bisphosphonate therapy.

Presence of acute infection at the intended implant site.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fayoum University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ain Shams University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fatma ElSayed

assistant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fatma E.Sayed Hassanein

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Assistant Professor Of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nermeen Nagi

Al Fayyum, Faiyum Governorate, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R702

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Efficacy of i-PRF Usage in Vestibular Socket Therapy
NCT07304986 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Soft Tissue Healing After Tooth Extraction
NCT06835543 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA