Effect of Two Incision Techniques on Soft and Hard Tissue Outcomes in Immediate Implant Placement in Class II Extraction Sockets of the Esthetic Zone:
NCT ID: NCT07020767
Last Updated: 2025-06-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
48 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-01-01
2025-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The VST group employed a minimally invasive vestibular incision to allow atraumatic extraction, implant placement, bone grafting, and membrane placement while preserving the labial soft tissue and periosteal blood supply. The Flap Elevation group followed a conventional intrasulcular flap approach. In both groups, implants were placed with 30 Ncm torque and augmented with MegaOss™ allograft and a resorbable collagen membrane (T-barrier™).
Clinical and radiographic evaluations were conducted at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months post-loading. Outcomes measured included Pink Esthetic Score (PES), peri-implant probing depth (PD), mucosal level changes, and crestal bone level changes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Soft Tissue Stability in Immediate Implant Placement Using (VST) Versus Conventional Flap in Type II Extraction Sockets
NCT06324747
Vestibular Socket Therapy in Compromised Sockets
NCT04332185
Clinical Evaluation of Soft Tissue Esthetics Around Immediate Implant Using Dual Zone Therapeutic Concept Versus Buccal Gap Fill to Bone Level
NCT03768297
Hard and Soft Tissue Changes Following Vestibular Socket Preservation Versus Ice Cream Cone Technique for Management of Defective Fresh Extraction Sockets
NCT06590168
Volumetric Changes of Labial Soft Tissue Contour Following Different Approaches with Immediate Implant Placement
NCT04310449
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To address these challenges, immediate implant placement was introduced to reduce treatment time, preserve socket dimensions, and optimize soft tissue outcomes (Kan, Rungcharassaeng, Umezu, \& Kois, 2003; Lang, Pun, Lau, Li, \& Wong, 2012). While immediate implants help maintain the overall ridge profile, they do not fully prevent bone remodeling of the buccal plate, which often results in soft tissue recession and compromised esthetic outcomes (Botticelli, Berglundh, Buser, \& Lindhe, 2003; Chen \& Buser, 2014).
Flap design during implant surgery has been identified as a critical factor influencing peri-implant bone and soft tissue healing. The traditional flap elevation approach provides good visibility but disrupts the periosteal blood supply, increasing the risk of bone resorption and soft tissue shrinkage (Fickl et al., 2008; Jeong et al., 2007). By contrast, flapless surgery preserves the periosteal blood supply and minimizes soft tissue trauma, leading to superior bone preservation and reduced postoperative discomfort (Becker, Goldstein, Becker, \& Sennerby, 2005; Oh, Shotwell, Billy, \& Wang, 2006). However, flapless techniques carry limitations such as reduced access and increased risk of malpositioning the implant or causing thermal bone damage without adequate irrigation (Choudhary et al., 2023).
To overcome the limitations of both approaches, Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST) was developed as a minimally invasive technique that allows simultaneous atraumatic extraction, implant placement, and socket augmentation through a small vestibular access incision (A. Elaskary et al., 2023). VST preserves the integrity of the labial soft tissues and periosteal blood supply, improves labial bone support, and enables simultaneous use of bone grafts and membranes to enhance both hard and soft tissue outcomes (Ghallab et al., 2023). Clinical trials comparing VST to conventional incisal extraction or partial extraction therapy (PET) have demonstrated comparable or superior outcomes in terms of Pink Esthetic Score (PES), soft tissue volume preservation, and facial bone thickness (A. Elaskary et al., 2023; Hamed et al., 2023).
Bone grafting materials used in combination with immediate implants have also been extensively studied. While autogenous bone has been considered the gold standard, it is often limited by donor site morbidity. Alternatives such as deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM), demineralized bone matrix (DBM), and collagen plugs have been successfully used to fill peri-implant defects and support labial bone regeneration (Araújo \& Lindhe, 2005; Artzi, Tal, \& Dayan, 2000; Jensen \& Terheyden, 2009). Randomized controlled trials have shown that using a combination of autogenous bone chips with DBBM (e.g., MinerOss X) significantly increases facial bone thickness compared to collagen plug or DBM alone (Hamed et al., 2023).
Moreover, the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) has become a standard metric to assess esthetic outcomes around implants, evaluating parameters such as mesial and distal papilla fill, soft tissue level and contour, alveolar process deficiency, and tissue color and texture (Fürhauser et al., 2005). Studies have consistently shown that minimally invasive approaches, like VST and PET, score highly on PES, reflecting superior esthetic outcomes (Cosyn et al., 2011; Evans \& Chen, 2008).
Vestibular socket therapy (VST) has emerged as a promising minimally invasive approach for preserving soft and hard tissue architecture during immediate implant placement, particularly in challenging esthetic zones. However, its clinical performance compared to conventional flap elevation remains underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of VST combined with Allograft and collagen membrane in enhancing esthetic outcomes, soft tissue stability, and bone preservation advancing minimally invasive protocols toward more predictable, patient-centered care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two parallel groups:
Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST) Group: Minimally invasive implant placement via vestibular access with bone grafting and collagen membrane.
Flap Elevation Group: Conventional mucoperiosteal flap technique with the same implant and grafting protocol.
Each surgical site (maximum of two per patient) was independently randomized. Outcome assessors and statisticians were blinded to group allocation to reduce bias. The trial aimed to evaluate differences in esthetic and tissue stability outcomes over a 12-month period.
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST) Group
Participants in this group underwent immediate implant placement using Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST). A minimally invasive vestibular incision was made, followed by atraumatic extraction, implant placement (BioHorizons, 30 Ncm), bone grafting with MegaOss™ allograft, and placement of a T-barrier™ collagen membrane. The membrane was stabilized with tacks, and the site was closed with 7/0 nylon sutures. Healing was supported by customized composite healing abutments, and final zirconia crowns were delivered at 3 months.
Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST) Group
A minimally invasive vestibular incision technique for atraumatic tooth extraction, followed by immediate implant placement using BioHorizons implants. The socket is augmented with MegaOss™ allograft and covered with T-barrier™ collagen membrane, stabilized with membrane tacks. Soft tissue closure is achieved with 7/0 nylon sutures. Customized composite healing abutments are used, and zirconia crowns are delivered at 3 months.
Flap Elevation Group
Participants in this group received immediate implant placement using a conventional mucoperiosteal flap elevation approach. After intrasulcular and vertical incisions, atraumatic extraction was followed by implant placement (BioHorizons, 30 Ncm), grafting with MegaOss™ allograft, and coverage with a T-barrier™ collagen membrane, stabilized with tacks. The site was closed with 7/0 nylon sutures, and healing was supported with customized composite healing abutments. Final zirconia crowns were placed at 3 months.
Flap Elevation Group
Traditional mucoperiosteal flap elevation with intrasulcular and vertical incisions, followed by atraumatic extraction and immediate implant placement using BioHorizons implants. The socket is grafted with MegaOss™ allograft, covered with T-barrier™ collagen membrane, and stabilized with tacks. The site is closed with 7/0 nylon sutures. Healing abutments and zirconia crowns are applied following the same timeline as the VST group.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST) Group
A minimally invasive vestibular incision technique for atraumatic tooth extraction, followed by immediate implant placement using BioHorizons implants. The socket is augmented with MegaOss™ allograft and covered with T-barrier™ collagen membrane, stabilized with membrane tacks. Soft tissue closure is achieved with 7/0 nylon sutures. Customized composite healing abutments are used, and zirconia crowns are delivered at 3 months.
Flap Elevation Group
Traditional mucoperiosteal flap elevation with intrasulcular and vertical incisions, followed by atraumatic extraction and immediate implant placement using BioHorizons implants. The socket is grafted with MegaOss™ allograft, covered with T-barrier™ collagen membrane, and stabilized with tacks. The site is closed with 7/0 nylon sutures. Healing abutments and zirconia crowns are applied following the same timeline as the VST group.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Presence of one or more non-restorable or remaining roots in the maxillary anterior region (canine to canine).
Class II extraction sockets confirmed by CBCT.
Sufficient apical and palatal bone to ensure proper implant positioning and primary stability.
Good compliance with treatment visits and oral hygiene.
Medically healthy with no systemic diseases affecting wound healing or implant success.
Exclusion Criteria
Smokers, diabetics, or pregnant/lactating women.
History of chemotherapy or radiotherapy in the head and/or neck region.
Patients on bisphosphonate therapy.
Presence of acute infection at the intended implant site.
20 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fayoum University
OTHER
Ain Shams University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Fatma ElSayed
assistant professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Fatma E.Sayed Hassanein
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Assistant Professor Of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nermeen Nagi
Al Fayyum, Faiyum Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
R702
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.