Comparing a Suture-based System for the Removal of Arterial and Veinous ECMO Cannulas to the Standard Approach
NCT ID: NCT07019662
Last Updated: 2025-12-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
102 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-10-27
2027-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patients with severe heart and lung failure may be treated with VA-ECMO (veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation), a life-support machine that temporarily takes over the function of the heart and lungs. To connect the patient to ECMO, large tubes (cannulas) are inserted into major blood vessels in the groin area.
When the patient no longer needs ECMO, these cannulas must be removed - a process known as decannulation. Closing the artery after removing the cannula is a critical step and can be associated with complications such as bleeding, vessel injury, or blood clots.
Currently, there are different methods to close the artery:
* Surgical closure: open surgery to directly suture the artery
* Manual compression: pressing on the artery to stop bleeding
* Vascular closure devices (VCDs): special tools that close the artery through the skin
There is no clear standard yet on which method is safest and most effective for ECMO patients.
Purpose of the Study:
The study aims to determine whether using a vascular closure device is as safe and effective as the current standard methods for femoral artery closure after VA-ECMO.
Study Design:
This is a randomized controlled trial. Patients who are scheduled for decannulation after VA-ECMO support will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:
* Intervention Group: Patients receive a vascular closure device to seal the artery (Abbott Perclose™ ProStyle™ Suture-Mediated Closure System).
* Control Group: Patients receive standard care, which may be either:
* Manual compression, or
* Surgical closure, depending on the treating physician's judgment and the patient's condition.
This allows for a real-world comparison of the Closure Device method to current clinical practice.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Coagulation Factors and Point-of-care Devices During Veno-venous ECMO Therapy
NCT03754868
Continuous Compartment Pressure Monitoring for Compartment Syndrome in VA-ECMO Patients
NCT05830721
Feasibility of the IC-Flow Device for Fluorescent Perfusion Evaluation During Feasibility of the IC-Flow Device
NCT03860493
Point of Care Echocardiography Versus Chest Radiography for the Assessment of Central Venous Catheter Placement
NCT02661607
Fixing the Short Stay Central Venous Catheter: Comparison of Two Techniques
NCT02932800
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Decannulation using the Perclose™ ProStyle™
Decannulation with a medical device
Wound Closure with a medical device
Standard of Care: Decannulation using surgical removal or manual compression
Decannulation using surgical removal or manual compression
Wound closure using surgical removal or manual compression
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Decannulation with a medical device
Wound Closure with a medical device
Decannulation using surgical removal or manual compression
Wound closure using surgical removal or manual compression
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Femoral placement of VA-ECMO with peripheral, percutaneous cannulation
* Arterial puncture site above the femoral bifurcation
* Cannula size must match or be smaller than the maximally licensed diameter for Perclose™ ProStyle™ (26 F (French) outer diameter arterial and 29 F outer diameter veinous)
* Patients must be eligible for either the Perclose™ ProStyle™ device or one of the two guideline-compliant alternatives for ECMO cannula removal (manual compression or surgical closure) according to the investigator's judgment.
* Initial arterial and/or venous puncture for ECMO cannulation was performed using ultrasound guidance with corresponding documentation available in the patient record.
Exclusion Criteria
* Surgical cannulation
* Ongoing Infection of the ECMO site
* Any patient who does not fullfil the eligibility criteria for the use of the study device according to its current Instructions for Use (IFU), including known contraindications, limitations or warnings.
* Participation in another interventional clinical trial.
* Patients who are pregnant (assessed by clinical routine testing) or lactating.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
IHF GmbH - Institut für Herzinfarktforschung
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robert Stöhr, PD Dr. Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universitäre Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Frankfurt ZIM - Med. Clinic 3 - Cardiology and Angiology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universitäre Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Frankfurt ZIM - Med. Clinic 3 - Cardiology and Angiology
Frankfurt, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Marcel Kunadt, Dr.
Role: CONTACT
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MDR-004
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.