Study to Assess Remote Imaging System to Monitor Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT ID: NCT07013448
Last Updated: 2025-06-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-09-30
2026-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Can the TASHA platform provide ulcer assessment data (e.g., size, depth, visible infection) that aligns with in-clinic evaluations by healthcare professionals? Can patients accurately perform self-scanning of their ulcers using the platform under clinical supervision? What is the variation (inc. root mean square error) between clinician-led and patient-led scans?
Participants will:
* Attend a standard in-clinic ulcer assessment as part of their usual care Undergo an additional 3D foot scan using the TASHA platform during their clinic visit.
* Be guided to perform a self-scan using the same platform, with clinical staff present.
* Have their scan data reviewed remotely by a clinician to compare with in-clinic assessments.
* This feasibility study will inform the design of future larger-scale trials and contribute to regulatory development of the TASHA platform as a digital medical device.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Nasal Fractures
NCT06163209
Hyperspectral Imaging in Thoracic Surgery
NCT04784884
Application of Ultrasonic Elastography in Lung Lesions
NCT02636985
Feasibility of Lymph Edema-induced Reticulation Subtraction Based on Computerized Tomography
NCT03523494
The Effectiveness and Safety of Electromagnetic Navigation Real-time Guided Percutaneous Lung Biopsy
NCT05799014
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study Rationale Diabetic foot ulcers are among the most debilitating and costly complications of diabetes, associated with high risks of infection, hospitalisation, and lower-limb amputation. Early and continuous monitoring of DFUs is critical to guide treatment, detect deterioration, and evaluate healing progression. However, current models of care rely predominantly on in-clinic assessments that are often infrequent due to healthcare capacity limitations, geographic access barriers, or logistical constraints.
Remote monitoring has the potential to increase continuity of care, improve early detection of wound deterioration, and reduce the clinical burden on specialist foot care services. The TASHA platform aims to address these needs by enabling structured, repeatable capture of wound images and clinical metadata for remote review and longitudinal tracking.
Study Design
This is a non-randomised, observational, exploratory pilot study involving up to 30 adult participants with active diabetic foot ulcers, conducted at a single National Health Service (NHS) clinic in the United Kingdom. The study is not powered to demonstrate clinical efficacy but is instead focused on evaluating:
Technical performance and image quality Accuracy and consistency of ulcer assessments using TASHA data Feasibility of supervised patient self-scanning Inter-rater reliability between in-clinic and remote clinical reviewers Study Procedures
Following informed consent, eligible participants will attend a routine diabetic foot clinic appointment, during which the following study-related activities will occur:
Standard Clinical Assessment: Performed by an NHS-employed healthcare professional. Ulcer stage, size, depth, presence of infection, and wound condition will be assessed and recorded according to standard local practice.
Clinician-led TASHA Scan: The healthcare professional will perform a 3D scan of the ulcer using the TASHA device. The system uses structured light and depth-sensing to construct a digital model of the ulcer and surrounding tissue, with accompanying photographic documentation.
Patient Self-Scan: Participants will then be guided to perform a self-scan of their ulcer using the same TASHA platform, under clinical supervision. This is designed to evaluate usability, scan quality, and the potential for future unsupervised home-based scanning.
Remote Clinical Review: TASHA scan data will be de-identified and reviewed by a remote clinician who is blinded to the in-clinic findings. They will assess wound characteristics using a structured form equivalent to the in-person evaluation.
Optional Feedback Collection: Participants may optionally provide structured feedback regarding the ease of use, instructions clarity, and perceived difficulty of the scanning task.
Device Description
TASHA consists of:
A 3D scanning unit utilising structured light or depth-sensing technology A software platform for scan acquisition, data encryption, and transfer A secure clinician portal for visualising digital twins and conducting remote assessments The device is currently unmarked (not yet UK Conformity Assessed \[UKCA\] or Conformité Européenne \[CE\] certified) and is being evaluated solely under ethics-approved investigational use conditions.
Data Management and Analysis All identifiable data will be securely stored on encrypted NHS infrastructure and will not be accessed by the device developer. Anonymised data (including wound scans and structured assessment metadata) will be securely transferred to Medical Intelligence Group Ltd for performance evaluation and iterative development of the TASHA platform.
Data Handling:
Role-based access control and encryption will be implemented across all data storage systems Anonymisation will include removal of all identifiers prior to data export Data will not be shared, sold, or commercialised beyond internal research and regulatory preparation Primary data outputs will include ulcer size, surface area, depth estimation, infection markers (as visible), and scan metadata.
Planned Statistical Analysis Concordance analysis: Agreement between in-clinic and remote assessments will be assessed using Cohen's Kappa for categorical variables (e.g. ulcer stage) and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) or Bland-Altman plots for continuous measures (e.g. ulcer size, depth).
Root Mean Square Error (RMSE): RMSE will be used to quantify measurement error between clinician and patient-generated scans, particularly for spatial metrics like ulcer area and volume.
Sensitivity and Specificity: The platform's ability to detect changes in ulcer condition (improvement, worsening, stability) will be calculated against in-clinic assessments as the reference standard.
Inter-rater Reliability: Multiple clinician reviewers (in-person and remote) will be compared to assess consistency in interpretation of TASHA scan data.
Descriptive Statistics: Demographics, ulcer characteristics, scan duration, and usability metrics (e.g. assistance required) will be summarised using basic descriptive statistics.
This analysis will inform future statistical powering and endpoint selection for a definitive trial.
Ethical and Regulatory Compliance This study has received ethics approval from a UK NHS Research Ethics Committee via the Integrated Research Application System (IRAS). It will be conducted in compliance with the UK Policy Framework for Health and Social Care Research, the Declaration of Helsinki, and Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines.
Risk management and insurance:
NHS indemnity applies to any clinical care-related activity carried out by NHS-employed staff Medical Intelligence Group Ltd has secured commercial liability insurance for all device-related research risks and data processing activity No adverse events are anticipated, as the TASHA system is non-invasive and used solely to supplement standard care assessments.
Future Applications
Insights from this pilot study will be used to:
Validate the clinical utility of the TASHA platform Optimise usability features for patient-led scanning Support UKCA/CE marking and regulatory submissions Design a statistically powered, multi-site clinical investigation Enable remote wound monitoring capabilities within community and home settings
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with DFU
Only one group used as all participants will receive the standard care as well as have a foot scan take with a non-invasive and non-ionising scanner
Foot scan
This does not constitute a intervention but all participants will undergo image scans of their ulcer
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Foot scan
This does not constitute a intervention but all participants will undergo image scans of their ulcer
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosed with a diabetic foot ulcer at the time of recruitment
* Receiving routine care at the participating NHS clinic
* Able to provide informed consent
* Able to sit and engage with the TASHA scanning device
* Willing to attempt a supervised self-scan of the affected foot
Exclusion Criteria
* Severe cognitive or physical impairments that prevent scanning or understanding instructions
* Active infection or medical instability requiring urgent intervention
* Participation in another interventional study that may interfere with this assessment
* Inability to communicate in English (unless appropriate translation or support is available)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tameside Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Medical Intelligence Group
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tameside General Hospital
Ashton-under-Lyne, UK, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
344307
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.