Diagnostic Electrical Cardioversion for Explaining Patient's AF and HF Symptoms
NCT ID: NCT07000942
Last Updated: 2025-06-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
112 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-08-01
2027-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The co-existence of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and Heart Failure (HF) is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and hospital admissions, significantly contributing to healthcare burden. Patients often experience overlapping symptoms, complicating identifying the disease primarily responsible for symptom burden. Electrical cardioversion (ECV) has been suggested to assess symptom status in sinus rhythm. However, the role of a diagnostic ECV in patients with AF and concomitant HF has not been established.
The hypothesis of this trial is that a diagnostic ECV can provide insight into AF-specific and HF-specific symptoms that can inform the physician and subsequently lead to treatment changes, as well as improve quality of life (QoL), and result changes in ejection fraction, cardiac output, and NT-proBNP levels.
Objective: To assess whether a diagnostic ECV results in more treatment changes after 3 months, compared to standard of care (no ECV).
Study design: This is an investigator initiated, randomized, open label with blinded endpoint evaluation, multi-centre, trial.
Study population: 112 patients with chronic HF and ECG confirmed persistent AF.
Trial intervention: Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either an ECV or standard of care with pharmacological rate and/or rhythm control.
Main study parameters/endpoints:
The primary outcome: total number of treatment alterations by the physician during 3 months post intervention/randomization.
Secondary outcomes: Success rate of ECV, recurrences of AF at 4 weeks, QoL changes assessed by AFEQT and KCCQ score, echocardiographic changes (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and cardiac output (CO)), and laboratory changes (NT-proBNP) between baseline (pre-cardioversion) and 4 weeks (post-cardioversion). Whether the physician can distinguish AF from HF symptoms and whether ECV can be used as diagnostic tool.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Since this is a pragmatic trial, the study will be embedded within care according to current AF and HF guidelines, that includes ECV and rhythm and/or rate control, while acknowledging wide variability in local practises. The patients in the intervention arm will undergo a diagnostic ECV. Both groups will fill out questionnaires regarding QoL (baseline and 4 weeks) and have an echocardiogram at 4 weeks. A blinded endpoint committee will assess potential treatment alterations prescribed by the physician in both patient groups within 3 months. No harm is expected for this study as the intervention will be based on national guidelines.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety of External Electrocardioversion in Device Patients
NCT02245009
Electrode Positions in Cardioverting Atrial Fibrillation
NCT03817372
Antero-posterior Versus Antero-lateral Electrode Position for Electrical Cardioversion of Typical Atrial Flutter
NCT00860314
Mitral Insufficiency Reduction With Biventricular Pacing
NCT01242397
A Combined Transvenous and Epicardial Lead Placement Procedure for Implantation of Cardiac Resynchronization Devices: a Feasibility Study.
NCT02247817
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Electrical cardioversion (ECV)
Electrical cardioversion (ECV)
Electrical cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and chronic heart failure
Standard of Care (SoC)
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Electrical cardioversion (ECV)
Electrical cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and chronic heart failure
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Diagnosis of HF ≥90 days prior to screening NYHA class ≥ 2 on guideline-directed medical therapy.
3. ECG-confirmed AF/Atrial flutter at screening
4. Received oral anti-coagulants for ≥ 3 weeks (DOAC, vitamin K antagonists with an INR between 2 and 3) prior to screening
5. Patients eligible for both treatment strategies judged by the investigator and physician.
6. Provide written dated informed consent for participation prior to trial admission.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Inability to understand and sign informed consent form
2. Hospitalization for acute HF or worsening HF ≤ 3 months prior to screening
3. Heart rate during AF/ atrial flutter ≥ 110 bpm, despite optimal rate control therapy at screening
4. Paroxysmal or permanent AF/atrial flutter
5. Previous left atrial ablation or surgery ≤ 3 months prior to screening
6. Planned catheter ablation at time of screening
7. AF due to a reversible cause (e.g. post-operative AF, hyperthyroidism)
8. Recent acute coronary syndrome, stroke/transient ischemic attack or cardiac intervention (≤90 days). Cardiac interventions include percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, and heart valve repair or replacement (endovascular or surgical)
9. Presence of (or scheduled for) mechanical assist device or heart transplantation
10. Patients with complex congenital heart disease, up to the discretion of the investigator.
11. Patients with current echocardiographic evidence of severe aortic-, mitral-, tricuspid- or pulmonary- valve disease (either stenosis or regurgitation)
12. Patients with an intracardiac thrombus
13. Expected life span from time of enrolment of ≤1 year, as assessed by the clinician
14. Patient currently enrolled in another randomized clinical trial
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Martini Hospital Groningen
OTHER
University Medical Center Groningen
OTHER
M. Rienstra
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
M. Rienstra
Prof. Dr.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UMCG
Groningen, Provincie Groningen, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DEEP-AF-HF
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.