Mitral Insufficiency Reduction With Biventricular Pacing
NCT ID: NCT01242397
Last Updated: 2010-12-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE1
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-01-31
2013-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CRT ON
After implant, patients will be randomized to CRT pacing ON vs OFF in crossover fashion with 3 months in each period
CRT pacing
The chronic effect of CRT pacing on the degree of MR in pts with severe-to-moderate or severe functional MR. The treatment being studied is CRT pacing therapy with standard of care LV lead placement. Patients will be randomized to CRT pacing ON vs. OFF and followed for a total of up to 8 months. This includes two 3-month crossover periods for each pacing modality (CRT ON and CRT OFF) and a 6-week washout period between these periods.
CRT- OFF
After implant, patients will be randomized to CRT pacing OFF vs ON in crossover fashion with 3 months in each period
CRT pacing
The chronic effect of CRT pacing on the degree of MR in pts with severe-to-moderate or severe functional MR. The treatment being studied is CRT pacing therapy with standard of care LV lead placement. Patients will be randomized to CRT pacing ON vs. OFF and followed for a total of up to 8 months. This includes two 3-month crossover periods for each pacing modality (CRT ON and CRT OFF) and a 6-week washout period between these periods.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CRT pacing
The chronic effect of CRT pacing on the degree of MR in pts with severe-to-moderate or severe functional MR. The treatment being studied is CRT pacing therapy with standard of care LV lead placement. Patients will be randomized to CRT pacing ON vs. OFF and followed for a total of up to 8 months. This includes two 3-month crossover periods for each pacing modality (CRT ON and CRT OFF) and a 6-week washout period between these periods.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with moderate-to-severe or severe functional MR.
* EROA \> 40 mm2 and an MR/LA \> 40% (severe)
* 30 ≤ EROA ≤ 40 mm2 and 30 ≤ MR/LA ≤ 40% (moderate-to-severe)
* Baseline rates of 50-90 beats per minute (patients with sinus rhythm) or AF
* QRS \< 120 ms
* LVEF \< 35%
* Willing to sign informed consent
* On standard stable heart failure medical regimen (beta blockers and ACE-I or ARBs) for at least 1 month before randomization, if tolerated
* Patient has the ability to understand the requirements of the study, including consent for use and disclosure of research-related information
* Patient has the ability to comply with study procedures and protocol, including required study visits
Exclusion Criteria
* previously implanted implantable pulse generators (IPG) or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) with at least 10 % pacing in the right ventricle
* patient has life expectancy \<6 months
* patient is pregnant
* significant aortic stenosis
* uncontrolled hypertension
* mitral valve stenosis
* severe mitral valve calcification
* ruptured chordae tendinae or papillary muscle
* mitral valve leaflet disorders (i.e. endocarditis, lupus, tumors, rheumatic heart disease)
* chronic mitral leaflet degeneration (ie. Marfans)
* previous valve replacement or surgery
* IV inotropes or IV vasodilators
* candidate for mitral valve repair or replacement surgery within the next 6 months
* patient has in-hospital acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (NSTEMI/STEMI) prior to randomization
* patient has planned or elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or other non-cardiac surgery prior to randomization
* patient is currently enrolled in an investigational drug or device study
* patient is clinically unstable per PI assessment
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medtronic
INDUSTRY
Duke University
OTHER
Massachusetts General Hospital
OTHER
Augusta University
OTHER
Trinity Medical Center, Illinois
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Trinity Medical Center
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Helbert Acosta, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Trinity Medical Center
Patrick Hranitzky, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke University
Jagmeet Singh, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Massachusetts General Hospital
Adam A Berman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Augusta University
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MiRBi- Acosta
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id