Efficacy of a Passive Lower Limb Exoskeleton in Reducing Plantar Pressure and Injuries From Prolonged Standing
NCT ID: NCT06995469
Last Updated: 2025-06-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
25 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-03-01
2025-05-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Access to a Sit-stand Computer Workstation and Back Pain
NCT02146482
The Effect of Exercise Applied With Stretching Platform in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT05726955
Effectiveness of Diaphragm Treatment in Reducing Low Back Pain
NCT06069388
Effects of Unstable Shoes on Trunk Muscle Activity, Lumbar Spine Kinematics and Pain in Patients With Low Back Pain
NCT02606370
Efficacy of the Mckenzie Method in Patients With Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain
NCT02123394
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of a passive exoskeleton for the lower limbs (Chairless Chair® 2.0) in redistributing plantar pressure and reducing musculoskeletal injuries associated with prolonged standing. The study also investigates the device's influence on postural stability, perceived fatigue, and user comfort.
Methodology Study design: Quasi-experimental with repeated measures (participants act as their own control).
Participants: 25 adult workers (aged 18-60), with ≥6 months of exposure to prolonged standing at work. Exclusion criteria included pre-existing musculoskeletal or circulatory disorders and use of orthopedic devices.
Device: Chairless Chair® 2.0 by Noonee Germany GmbH-a passive, non-powered exoskeleton enabling users to alternate between standing and semi-sitting positions.
Tools and Measurements:
Podoprint S4 pressure platform to measure:
Plantar pressure distribution (forefoot, midfoot, heel)
Body sway and stability (center of pressure displacement)
CR10 Borg scale for fatigue
QUEST 2.0 for usability and satisfaction
Data Analysis:
Quantitative analysis using SPSS and JASP
Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon tests for comparisons
Spearman correlations and Chi-square tests for categorical relationships
Statistical significance set at p \< 0.05
Key Variables Dependent: Plantar pressure (kPa), body sway (cm²), postural stability (mm/s), fatigue perception, comfort.
Independent: Use of exoskeleton, age, gender, BMI, type of footwear, reported discomfort.
Ethical and Legal Framework Ethical approval granted by the Comité de Ética de la Universidad Católica de Valencia (CEI).
Compliance with LOPDGDD, GDPR, and Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed consent obtained; anonymity and data protection were strictly maintained.
Expected Outcomes Reduction in peak plantar pressure and postural sway when using the exoskeleton.
Improvement in stability and fatigue levels.
Enhanced user comfort and satisfaction, making the device a feasible ergonomic intervention.
Significance This study seeks to fill a gap in scientific literature regarding the biomechanical benefits of passive lower-limb exoskeletons in real work environments, providing evidence for their role in injury prevention, ergonomic improvement, and worker well-being.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Exoskeleton
This single-group cohort consists of participants assessed under two conditions: (1) performing prolonged standing tasks with the use of a passive lower-limb exoskeleton (Chairless Chair® 2.0) and (2) performing the same tasks without the exoskeleton.
Each participant serves as their own control in a within-subject, repeated-measures design to evaluate changes in plantar pressure distribution, postural stability, perceived fatigue, and device usability.
Chairless Chair® 2.0 Passive Lower-Limb Exoskeleton
Participants used a passive lower-limb exoskeleton (Chairless Chair® 2.0) during their regular work tasks involving prolonged standing. The device enables a semi-seated posture without the need for external power, aiming to reduce lower limb strain.
The intervention involved each participant performing their typical standing tasks once with the exoskeleton and once without it, in a within-subject repeated-measures design. Each participant served as their own control.
Objective data were collected using a plantar pressure platform (Podoprint S4, Namrol) to measure:
Plantar pressure distribution
Postural stability
Body sway
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Chairless Chair® 2.0 Passive Lower-Limb Exoskeleton
Participants used a passive lower-limb exoskeleton (Chairless Chair® 2.0) during their regular work tasks involving prolonged standing. The device enables a semi-seated posture without the need for external power, aiming to reduce lower limb strain.
The intervention involved each participant performing their typical standing tasks once with the exoskeleton and once without it, in a within-subject repeated-measures design. Each participant served as their own control.
Objective data were collected using a plantar pressure platform (Podoprint S4, Namrol) to measure:
Plantar pressure distribution
Postural stability
Body sway
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Currently employed in jobs requiring prolonged standing (≥4 hours/day)
Minimum 6 months of work experience in such standing-intensive roles
Physically capable of performing normal job tasks
Able and willing to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
Current use of orthopedic or ergonomic devices, such as foot orthoses
Uncontrolled medical conditions that may pose a risk (e.g., uncontrolled hypertension)
Pregnancy
Inability to understand or comply with study procedures
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fundación Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Javier Ferrer Torregrosa
HEAD OF PODIATRY DEPARTMENT
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
JAVIER FERRER TORREGROSA, Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UNIVERSIDAD CATOLICA DE VALENCIA
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clinicas UCV
Valencia, València, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Liu L, Wei W, Zheng K, Diao Y, Wang Z, Li G, Zhao G. Design of an Unpowered Ankle-Foot Exoskeleton Used for Walking Assistance. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2021 Nov;2021:4501-4504. doi: 10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9630707.
Steinhilber B, Seibt R, Rieger MA, Luger T. Postural Control When Using an Industrial Lower Limb Exoskeleton: Impact of Reaching for a Working Tool and External Perturbation. Hum Factors. 2022 Jun;64(4):635-648. doi: 10.1177/0018720820957466. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
Kong YK, Park CW, Cho MU, Kim SY, Kim MJ, Hyun DJ, Bae K, Choi JK, Ko SM, Choi KH. Guidelines for Working Heights of the Lower-Limb Exoskeleton (CEX) Based on Ergonomic Evaluations. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 13;18(10):5199. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105199.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UCV/2024-2025/030
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.