Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of Oliceridine Versus Morphine or Sufentanil for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Surgeries: a Randomized Control Trial
NCT ID: NCT06990893
Last Updated: 2025-05-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-11-11
2026-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Method: Researchers included 90 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical conditions I and III, aged 18 to 65 years, who were scheduled to undergo orthopedic lumbar general anesthesia surgery at an appropriate time. The patients were randomly divided into 3 groups, with 30 cases in each group: The oxeridine group (Group A), where a loading dose of 1.5mg of oxeridine was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.01mg/kg-1.h-1 was connected. Oxeridine was mixed with normal saline to 100ml at a rate of 2ml/h. Morphine group (Group M), a loading dose of 4mg of morphine was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.03mg.kg-1.h-1 morphine was connected with normal saline to 100ml at a rate of 2ml/h. Sufentanil group (Group S), a 4u loading dose of sufentanil was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.03ug.kg-1.h-1 was connected. Sufentanil was combined with normal saline to 100ml at a rate of 2ml/h.The resting and exercise VAS pain scores of the three groups of patients at 30 minutes, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours after the operation and adverse reactions within 48 hours were recorded.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
the Efficacy and Safety of Oliceridine Fumarate Injection for Acute Pain After Abdominal Surgery
NCT06530563
Comparison of the Effect of Lidocaine Infusion Applied at Different Doses During Lumbar Spinal Surgery on Hemodynamics and Postoperative Pain
NCT05936190
Effect of Perioperative Lidocaine on Gastrointestinal Function Recovery After Lumbar Spine Surgery in Adults
NCT04922359
The Effect of Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Opioid Consumption After Lumbar Spine Surgery
NCT03624985
Comparing Effect of Opioid-sparing Versus Conventional Anesthesia on Quality of Recovery After Emergency Laparotomy
NCT06889090
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
The oliceridine group(A)
A loading dose of 1.5mg of oliceridine was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.01 mg.kg-1.h-1 orselidine was connected and diluted with normal saline to 100ml at a rate of 2ml per hour
Oliceridine
a loading dose of 1.5 mg of oliceridine was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.01 mg.kg-1.h-1 oliceridine was connected with normal saline to 100 ml at a rate of 2 ml per hour
The morphine group(M)
A loading dose of 4mg of morphine was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump was connected to 0.03mg.kg-1.h-1 morphine mixed with normal saline to 100ml at a rate of 2ml per hour
Morphine
a loading dose of 4 mg of morphine was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.03 mg.kg-1.h-1 morphine was connected with normal saline to 100 ml at a rate of 2 ml per hour
The sufentanil group(S)
A loading dose of 4ug of sufentanil was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.03ug.kg-1.h-1 was connected. Sufentanil was mixed with normal saline to 100ml at a rate of 2ml per hour
Sufentanil
A 4 ug loading dose of sufentanil was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.03 ug.kg-1 h-1 was connected. sufentanil was mixed with normal saline to 100 ml at a rate of 2 ml per hour
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Oliceridine
a loading dose of 1.5 mg of oliceridine was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.01 mg.kg-1.h-1 oliceridine was connected with normal saline to 100 ml at a rate of 2 ml per hour
Morphine
a loading dose of 4 mg of morphine was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.03 mg.kg-1.h-1 morphine was connected with normal saline to 100 ml at a rate of 2 ml per hour
Sufentanil
A 4 ug loading dose of sufentanil was intravenously injected. Ten minutes later, an intravenous analgesic pump of 0.03 ug.kg-1 h-1 was connected. sufentanil was mixed with normal saline to 100 ml at a rate of 2 ml per hour
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged 18-65 years
* Ethically, the patient voluntarily accepted this trial and signed the informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
* Nervous system disease
* Mental and psychological disorders
* Abnormal liver and kidney functions
* Participated in another drug clinical research within the past 30 days
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Anqing Municipal Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Anqing Hospital Anesthesiology
Anqing, Anhui, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Sun Ling
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.