Efficacy of Routine Saline Flushing in the Prevention of Nephrostomy Tube Obstructions: A Pilot Study
NCT ID: NCT06987877
Last Updated: 2025-10-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-01-01
2027-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
If participants agree to participate in this study, participants will undergo randomized assignment to either continue to routinely flush the nephrostomy tube with normal saline or not to routinely flush the nephrostomy tube with normal saline. Participantswill be in the study for approximately 3 months if they decide to stay for the whole study.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Outcomes of Management of Bowel Obstruction Pilot Study
NCT06817551
Trial of Void With Saline Bladder Instillation
NCT03609476
Indwelling Urinary Catheterization Versus Clean Intermittent Catheterization for the Short-term Management of Hospitalized Patients With Transient Acute Urinary Retention
NCT02942641
Surgical Consent Process for Trans-obturator Tape Slings.
NCT02750878
Mesh-Reduced Sling For Treating Stress Urinary Incontinence, Efficacy and Durability Trial
NCT05842005
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Routine saline flushing of percutaneous nephrostomy tubes is commonly performed at many institutions with the intent of reducing incidences of tube obstruction. Patients at some institutions are instructed to flush their nephrostomy tubes between one to three times a day with 10mL of normal saline. Although routine flushing is widely practiced, to our knowledge, there is no published evidence to support the efficacy of flushing in reducing incidence of nephrostomy tube obstruction. Furthermore, flushing of the percutaneous nephrostomy tubes may impact patient's quality of life, due to discomfort related with flushing, bear cost to the patient, and manipulation of the catheter while flushing, which may lead to inadvertent dislodgment.
In this pilot study, the investigators would like to investigate if there is any significant difference of routine flushing of nephrostomy tubes on the rates of nephrostomy tube obstructions. If there is no significant difference, this could potentially lead to larger studies that can elucidate the efficacy of this practice.
Normal Saline Normal saline is an isotonic solution of 0.9% of sodium chloride and contains 154 mmol/L of sodium and chloride ions. It widely used intravenously for fluid resuscitation or as a drug solvent. Intravenous administration of normal saline has very little impact on the human body in patients with normal renal function and in physiologic conditions. In addition, it has also been used to flush a wide variety of catheters in the interventional radiology field, including abscess drains, percutaneous biliary drains, and nephrostomy tubes. Any impact of normal saline administered directly into the urinary system has never been studied, although it has been thought to be safe and is commonly performed in interventional radiology practice.
Proposed Research
The investigators hypothesize that routine flushing of percutaneous nephrostomy tubes does not significantly change the incidence of nephrostomy tube obstructions. The study design is a single center, prospective, randomized pilot study. The investigators will enroll 20 patients with nephrostomy tubes, male, female, or non-binary, aged 18 - 80 years, with a new or ongoing indication for a nephrostomy tube. Subjects will be allocated 1:1 to the intervention, no routine flushing of the nephrostomy tube, and control arms, routine flushing of the nephrostomy tube. Any patients who are on a shortened exchange interval due to frequent encrustations of their nephrostomy tubes or have a planned definitive treatment for the indication of their nephrostomy tube prior to their next scheduled routine exchange will be excluded.
Patients will be enrolled at their index nephrostomy tube placement or their routine nephrostomy tube exchange. Once enrolled, the patients will undergo randomization to either the experimental or control arms. The patient will then undergo the percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement or exchange procedure per standard of care. There will be a single follow up timepoint at their routine exchange appointment or earlier if there are any catheter related complications and it is determined, per standard of care, that an unplanned nephrostomy tube exchange procedure is indicated. At the follow up timepoint, a physician will determine if there is any obstruction or dislodgement of the nephrostomy tube.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Routine Flushing of Nephrostomy
Subjects in the routine flushing group will continue to flush their nephrostomy tubes once per day with 10mL of normal saline
Flushing of nephrostomy
Subjects assigned to this cohort will flush their nephrostomy catheter once daily with 10 mL of normal saline
No Flushing of Nephrostomy
Subjects allocated to the study intervention group will not flush their nephrostomy tube during the duration of the research study
No flushing of the nephrostomy
Subjects allocated to the study intervention group will not flush their nephrostomy tube during the duration of the research study
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No flushing of the nephrostomy
Subjects allocated to the study intervention group will not flush their nephrostomy tube during the duration of the research study
Flushing of nephrostomy
Subjects assigned to this cohort will flush their nephrostomy catheter once daily with 10 mL of normal saline
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* History of anaphylaxis to iodinated contrast
* Pregnant or intent to become pregnant during the study
* Irreversible coagulopathy
* Planned for definitive treatment for the clinical indication of the nephrostomy tube prior to 12-week post-intervention.
* Planned routine exchange prior to 12 weeks after nephrostomy tube exchange or placement procedure
* Complete sensory loss below T10 dermatome.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yan Epelboym, M.D.,M.P.H.
Assistant Professor of Radiology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024p003079
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.