Retained Urine Volume and Bacteriuria in Traditional Versus Vented Urine Drainage Systems
NCT ID: NCT02052674
Last Updated: 2019-07-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
PHASE1
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-03-31
2015-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
If a vented catheter drains the bladder better than a non-vented catheter it may lower the risk of retained urine in the bladder which could help prevent urinary tract infections.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Patient-operated Valved Catheter Versus Indwelling Transurethral Catheter
NCT01460303
Comparison of Urinary Flow Study
NCT06918067
Measuring Bladder Volumes Scanning in the ICU
NCT03428113
Accuracy of Bladder Scanners in Post-operative Voiding Trials
NCT03028753
Urinary Catheter 'Fill and Flush' Valve: Safety, Effectiveness, Acceptability and Feasibility Trial
NCT04243902
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Vented urinary drainage system
This group will be catheterized with a vented urinary drainage system. Several data sets will be evaluated to compare the two arms of the study: retained urine volume, the difference (ΔH) in meniscus heights in the dependent loops, time necessary for drainage of dependent loops, and incidence of bacteriuria.
Vented urinary drainage system
This group will be catheterized with a vented urinary drainage system. Several data sets will be evaluated to compare the two arms of the study: retained urine volume, the difference (ΔH) in meniscus heights in the dependent loops, time necessary for drainage of dependent loops, and incidence of bacteriuria.
Non-vented urinary drainage system
This group will be catheterized with a non-vented urinary drainage system. Several data sets will be evaluated to compare the two arms of the study: retained urine volume, the difference (ΔH) in meniscus heights in the dependent loops, time necessary for drainage of dependent loops, and incidence of bacteriuria.
Non-vented urinary drainage system
This group will be catheterized with a non-vented urinary drainage system. Several data sets will be evaluated to compare the two arms of the study: retained urine volume, the difference (ΔH) in meniscus heights in the dependent loops, time necessary for drainage of dependent loops, and incidence of bacteriuria.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vented urinary drainage system
This group will be catheterized with a vented urinary drainage system. Several data sets will be evaluated to compare the two arms of the study: retained urine volume, the difference (ΔH) in meniscus heights in the dependent loops, time necessary for drainage of dependent loops, and incidence of bacteriuria.
Non-vented urinary drainage system
This group will be catheterized with a non-vented urinary drainage system. Several data sets will be evaluated to compare the two arms of the study: retained urine volume, the difference (ΔH) in meniscus heights in the dependent loops, time necessary for drainage of dependent loops, and incidence of bacteriuria.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Anticipated indwelling bladder catheter placement for greater than 24 hours
* Anticipated post-op admission to a surgical ICU
Exclusion Criteria
* Anticipated bandaged postoperative suprapubic incisions
* Anatomical deformity that precludes appropriate suprapubic access for ultrasound bladder scanning
* Surgical procedure that prevents accurate core body temperature by any means other than by bladder temperature
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Florida
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
William B. Smith, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Florida
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
201300634
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.