At Home Early vs. Delayed Catheter Removal Following Failed Postoperative Voiding Trial: a Randomized Trial
NCT ID: NCT05353400
Last Updated: 2023-05-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
9 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-06-29
2023-04-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Patient Removal of Catheters After Urogynecologic Surgery
NCT04783012
Reducing Postoperative Catheterization
NCT03009968
Urinary Retention After Removing Urinary Catheter at 24 Hour Versus 48 Hour in Patients With Vaginal Surgery
NCT04954443
Home vs. Office Foley Catheter Removal in Women With Voiding Difficulty Following Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery
NCT03373773
Timing of Repeat Voiding Trials After Outpatient Pelvic Floor Surgery
NCT03048682
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Over the past few years, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been adopted for patients undergoing reconstructive vaginal and minimally invasive (laparoscopic or robotic) surgery with increased focus on patient centered outcomes5. The benefits of ERAS in pelvic reconstructive surgery often allow for patients to be discharged home from the hospital the same day of their surgery. Unfortunately, same day discharge is associated with higher rates of postoperative voiding dysfunction and subsequent discharge home with a urinary catheter, with an incidence reported as high as 33.9-36%2,6. This increased rate of postoperative urinary retention has been reflected in our patient population. Prior to the implementation of ERAS in our pelvic reconstructive surgery division at Atrium Health, the rate of discharge home with a urinary catheter after failed VT on postoperative day (POD) 1 was 28%. With the implementation of an ERAS protocol and same day discharge (POD 0), the rate climbed to 43%7. Consequently, a higher percentage of postoperative patients have required a second VT prior to catheter discontinuation. This has necessitated additional clinical visits with a nurse or other provider, further stretching our clinical staff and obligating patients to make an additional trip to the clinic for a repeat postoperative VT.
Recent evidence supports the safety and improved patient experience in patients who self-discontinue a transurethral urinary catheter. In the study by Shatkin-Margolis et al., patients who had undergone pelvic reconstructive surgery were randomized to either self- discontinuation or in office discontinuation overseen by medical personnel one week after surgery8. This study found that self-discontinuation of transurethral catheter was non-inferior to office-based discontinuation following pelvic reconstructive surgery. Additionally, the authors found that self-discontinuation resulted in fewer patient encounters and improved patient experience.
Given this supportive evidence of safe catheter self-discontinuation and our practice's desire to improve patient satisfaction while decreasing clinical burden, we have adopted a practice where the patient self-removes their urinary catheter on the same day that a typical in-office VT would occur (POD 3). During preoperative counseling visits, our patients receive structured handouts with pictorial and descriptive language explaining how to safely self-remove a transurethral catheter (Figure 1). If VT failure should occur, the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) nursing staff review the instructions once again with the patient and the patient's support person(s) prior to discharge. Patients are told to call the office with any symptoms or concerns. Additionally, a nurse from our practice follows up with the patient via telephone on POD 1.
Patient experience following surgery is an important patient centered outcome. Unfortunately, being discharged home with an indwelling transurethral catheter for any amount of time is often perceived by patients as a postoperative complication and is a source of dissatisfaction in patients undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery9-10. Therefore, decreasing the dissatisfaction surrounding postoperative catheter use improves the patient experience. Several studies have evaluated early postoperative catheter discontinuation after pelvic reconstructive surgery in an effort to limit the length of time that a catheter is in place. In a randomized controlled trial of immediate versus POD1 catheter removal in patients undergoing minimally invasive pelvic reconstructive surgery by Vallabh-Patel et al. the rate of POUR on POD 0 was 31%; however, the rate on POD 1 was 4.5%2. Similar low rates of POUR were noted in a prospective cohort trial performed by Botros et al. which evaluated the effects of a mid-urethral sling at the time of robotic sacrocolpopexy and noted a POD 1 retention rate of 1% in this patient population11. Finally, in a retrospective cohort study incorporating both laparoscopic and vaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery performed by El Hiraki et al., the rate of failed VT within 23 hours of surgery was 11.1% for minimally invasive group and 34% for the vaginal surgery group12. This limited body of evidence suggests that a voiding trial as early as postoperative day 1 seems to yield a voiding trial pass rate of 1-34% in pelvic reconstructive surgery patients.
Our group aims to optimize urinary catheter management for both the patient and the clinical staff in the postoperative period when patients are discharged on the same day of their surgery with a transurethral urinary catheter. We are proposing a non-inferiority trial comparing at home POD 1 catheter removal with at home POD 3 catheter removal (our current standard of practice).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
(Intervention group): self-removal of transurethral catheter on POD 1
Subjects will self-remove transurethral catheter at home on postop day 1
Early urinary catheter removal
Early catheter removal
(Standard practice group): self-removal of transurethral catheter on POD 3
Subjects will self-remove transurethral catheter at home on postop day 3
Urinary catheter removal on POD 3
Catheter removal on POD 3
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Early urinary catheter removal
Early catheter removal
Urinary catheter removal on POD 3
Catheter removal on POD 3
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Megan Tarr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Atrium Health
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
V13-30-2022
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IRB00083499
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.