Hand Dysfunction in Coronary Diagnosis and Intervention Via Distal Radial Access

NCT ID: NCT06986889

Last Updated: 2025-05-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

640 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-20

Study Completion Date

2026-05-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Randomized controlled trial for comparison of the hand dysfunction in coronary diagnosis and intervention via distal vs conventional radial access

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Coronary diagnosis and intervention via distal radial access has gradually become an alternative access to the conventional radial access because of its advantages of reducing radial artery occlusion (RAO), shortening compression time, and decreasing patient discomfort. However, as awareness of distal radial access has increased, some patients have been found to have symptoms such as abnormal hand sensation and inflexibility after the procedure.

The primary objective is to assess hand function after coronary diagnosis and intervention via distal vs conventional radial access at 24 hours and 1 month.

Hand sensory and motor dysfunction will be assessed by:

* Consultation and physical examination
* Hand grip test
* Hand pinch test (lateral pinch)
* Monofilament sensory test
* Quick DASH questionnaire
* High-frequent ultrasound The other endpoints include the success rate of puncture, the success rate of single-attempt puncture, time of puncture, procedural duration, duration of hemostasis, vascular complication, etc.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD) Distal Raidal Artery Hand Functions

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Prospective, randomized, single-center clinical trial
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Distal radial artery access group

Subjects randomized to experimental group were underwent coronary diagnosis and intervention via distal radial artery access.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Distal radial artery access

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Half of the patients enrolled in the study undergoing coronary diagnosis and intervention will be randomized distal radial access for cardiac catheterization.

Conventional radial artery access group

Subjects randomized to active comparator group were underwent coronary diagnosis and intervention via conventional radial artery access.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional radial artery access

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Half of the patients enrolled in the study undergoing coronary diagnosis and intervention will be randomized conventional radial access for cardiac catheterization.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Conventional radial artery access

Half of the patients enrolled in the study undergoing coronary diagnosis and intervention will be randomized conventional radial access for cardiac catheterization.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Distal radial artery access

Half of the patients enrolled in the study undergoing coronary diagnosis and intervention will be randomized distal radial access for cardiac catheterization.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Indications for coronary diagnosis and intervention
* Distal and conventional radial artery pulsation are palpable
* Patient should be able to comply with the protocol

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \< 18 years or ≥ 90 years
* Height ≥ 185 cm
* Acute STEMI
* Haemodynamic instability
* Contraindications to puncture at the puncture site (such as infection, scarring or indwelling needles)
* Enrollment in another study that competes or interferes with this study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wujin People's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gaojun Cai, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Cardiovascular department, Changzhou Wujin People's Hospital

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Feng Li, Ms

Role: CONTACT

+86-0519-85579192

Gaojun Cai, MD

Role: CONTACT

+86-0519-85579193

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

van Leeuwen MA, van Mieghem NM, Lenzen MJ, Selles RW, Hoefkens MF, Zijlstra F, van Royen N. The effect of transradial coronary catheterization on upper limb function. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 20;8(4):515-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.10.025. Epub 2015 Mar 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25819177 (View on PubMed)

Sgueglia GA, Hassan A, Harb S, Ford TJ, Koliastasis L, Milkas A, Zappi DM, Navarro Lecaro A, Ionescu E, Rankin S, Said CF, Kuiper B, Kiemeneij F. International Hand Function Study Following Distal Radial Access: The RATATOUILLE Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jun 27;15(12):1205-1215. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.04.023. Epub 2022 May 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35595672 (View on PubMed)

Tehrani BN, Sherwood MW, Damluji AA, Epps KC, Bakhshi H, Cilia L, Dassanayake I, Eltebaney M, Gattani R, Howard E, Kepplinger D, Ofosu-Somuah A, Batchelor WB. A Randomized Comparison of Radial Artery Intimal Hyperplasia Following Distal Versus Proximal Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography: PRESERVE RADIAL. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Feb 20;13(4):e031504. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031504. Epub 2024 Feb 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38353242 (View on PubMed)

Daralammouri Y, Nazzal Z, Mosleh YS, Abdulhaq HK, Khayyat ZY, Hamshary YE, Azamtta M, Ghanim A, Awwad F, Majadla S, Maree M, Hamaida J, Ismail Y. Distal Radial Artery Access in comparison to Forearm Radial Artery Access for Cardiac Catheterization: A Randomized Controlled Trial (DARFORA Trial). J Interv Cardiol. 2022 Jul 15;2022:7698583. doi: 10.1155/2022/7698583. eCollection 2022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35911661 (View on PubMed)

Chen T, Li L, Li F, Lu W, Shi G, Li W, Yang A, Huang H, Xiao J, Zhang Q, Gu J, Xue S, Zhang L, Li L, Xu L, Ji R, Wang H, Cai G. Comparison of long-term radial artery occlusion via distal vs. conventional transradial access (CONDITION): a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. 2024 Feb 8;22(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03281-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38331793 (View on PubMed)

Babunashvili AM, Pancholy S, Zulkarnaev AB, Kaledin AL, Kochanov IN, Korotkih AV, Kartashov DS, Babunashvili MA. Traditional Versus Distal Radial Access for Coronary Diagnostic and Revascularization Procedures: Final Results of the TENDERA Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Dec;104(7):1396-1405. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31271. Epub 2024 Oct 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39474765 (View on PubMed)

Aminian A, Sgueglia GA, Wiemer M, Kefer J, Gasparini GL, Ruzsa Z, van Leeuwen MAH, Ungureanu C, Leibundgut G, Vandeloo B, Kedev S, Bernat I, Ratib K, Iglesias JF, Al Hage E, Posteraro GA, Pascut D, Maes F, Regazzoli D, Kakonyi K, Meijers TA, Colletti G, Krivoshei L, Lochy S, Zafirovska B, Horak D, Nolan J, Degrauwe S, Tobita K, Saito S. Distal Versus Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: The DISCO RADIAL Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jun 27;15(12):1191-1201. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.04.032. Epub 2022 May 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35595673 (View on PubMed)

Al-Azizi K, Moubarak G, Dib C, Sayfo S, Szerlip M, Thomas S, Hale S, Zyl JV, Settele RM, Gonzalez OR, Ventura SJ, DiMaio JM, Mack MJ, Potluri S. Distal Versus Proximal Radial Artery Access for Cardiac Catheterization: 1-Year Outcomes. Am J Cardiol. 2024 Jun 1;220:102-110. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.02.036. Epub 2024 Mar 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38432334 (View on PubMed)

Kozinski L, Orzalkiewicz Z, Dabrowska-Kugacka A. Feasibility and Safety of the Routine Distal Transradial Approach in the Anatomical Snuffbox for Coronary Procedures: The ANTARES Randomized Trial. J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 11;12(24):7608. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247608.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38137677 (View on PubMed)

Gupta M, Kumar V, Rahman MW, Srivastava S, Pandey U, Sinha SK. Comparison Between Distal Trans-radial Access and Conventional Trans-radial Access for Coronary Angiography. Cureus. 2023 Sep 12;15(9):e45081. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45081. eCollection 2023 Sep.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37842393 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20250501

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.