Surgical Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Local Anesthesia With Epinephrine x Intravenous Regional Anesthesia.

NCT ID: NCT02986347

Last Updated: 2020-04-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

78 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-05-27

Study Completion Date

2020-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The anesthetic technique of choice for surgical treatment of CTS varies among surgeons. In the last decade some studies have described the performance of this surgery using local anesthesia with adrenaline without the necessity of sedation or the use of pneumatic garrote, having good effectiveness and substantial reduction of costs. However there is need for studies with an appropriate design and methodology to evaluate the actual effectiveness of this kind of anesthesia for the surgical treatment of CTS.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and cost of open surgery for CTS in a randomized trial comparing two anesthesia methods: intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier) and local anesthesia with adrenaline without limb garroting (Lalondi).

Methods: This study was developed in the Group of Hand Surgery and Upper Limb; Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP / EPM with co-participation of the Hand Surgery and Microsurgery Department of Hospital Alvorada. This study will be a Randomized Clinical Trial. The previous calculation of the sample resulted in 78 patients. The following primary outcomes will be assessed: Pain through visual analogue scale (VAS). Costs: Costs related to anesthetic and surgical procedures will be recorded. The secondary outcomes will be: Use of Analgesics, Anxiety and Depression through the HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) scale. Quality of life through the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ). Remission of paresthesia after surgical intervention, complications and failures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Surgical treatment of CTS is most often performed under hospital conditions, with the use of anesthesia. The anesthetic technique of choice varies among surgeons. In the last decade some studies have described the performance of this surgery using local anesthesia with adrenaline without the necessity of sedation or the use of pneumatic garrote, having good effectiveness and substantial reduction of costs for the procedure with this anesthetic method. However, when we evaluated the level and strength of the evidence from these studies, we notice that there is a need for studies with an appropriate design and methodology to evaluate the actual effectiveness of this kind of anesthesia for the surgical treatment of CTS.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of open surgery for CTS in a randomized trial comparing two anesthesia methods: intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier) and local anesthesia with adrenaline without limb garroting (Lalondi).

Methods: This study was developed in the Group of Hand Surgery and Upper Limb; Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP / EPM with co-participation of the Hand Surgery and Microsurgery Department of the Medical Residency Service in Hand Surgery of Hospital Alvorada. This study will be a Randomized Clinical Trial. The previous calculation of the sample resulted in the need for total inclusion of 35 patients in each group, total of 70 patients, considering a loss of 10% during follow-up we will include 78 patients. The following primary outcomes will be assessed: Pain through visual analogue scale (VAS), that, will be measured in the pre-operative, transoperatory, immediate postoperative, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours after surgery. Costs: Costs related to anesthetic and surgical procedures will be recorded. The secondary outcomes will be: Use of Analgesics, Anxiety and Depression through the HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) scale. Quality of life through the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ). Remission of paresthesia after surgical intervention, complications and failures.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

open label

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier)

The anesthetic technique described by Bier will be done by the anesthesiologist. The following steps were followed: 1)Placement double tourniquet on the proximal portion of the arm 2)Asepsis and antisepsis of the operative limb 3)Puncture and venous catheterization most distal in the limb 4)Elevation of limb for 1 to 2 minutes, next the limb will be spirally wrapped with Esmarch from the distal to proximal 5)The proximal cuff will be inflated 6)Withdrawal of Esmarch and injection of 40ml of lidocaine without epinephrine at 0.5% 7)Removal the canula until the distal cuff is inflated and the proximal cuff is emptied 8)Removal of the club must be done after the surgery, at least 40 minutes after the injection of the anesthetic.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier Technique)

Local anesthesia with adrenaline

Patients will be anesthetized by surgeons, who are familiar with the technique described by Lalonde. Around thirty minutes before surgery, will be infused with 20 ml of an anesthetic solution. The infiltrated solution is composed of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine in 1: 100,000. Initially 10 mL of the solution will be applied slowly in the flexion fold region of the wrist just below the skin and subfascial plane. The needle is moved slowly. The needle is then redirected to the radial side of the proximal palmar region for infiltration of another 2-3 mL of the subcutaneous solution. The remaining 7-8mL in the subdermal plane and anterior to the transverse carpal ligament.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Local anesthesia with adrenaline

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

local anesthesia with adrenaline without limber garroting (Lalonde Technique)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier)

Intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier Technique)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Local anesthesia with adrenaline

local anesthesia with adrenaline without limber garroting (Lalonde Technique)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients older than 18 years of age, with idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome with indication for surgery due to failure of conservative treatment for at least three months or that presented at the initial diagnosis with motor impairment detected by clinical examination (hypotrophy) and/or by electromyography (ENMG) examination.
* The diagnosis of CTS will be made through the clinical evaluation in which CTS patients will be considered, those who present at least four of the clinical criteria proposed and proven by the electromyography examination.

Clinical Criteria for CTS - (At least 4 criteria will be required for clinical confirmation of the diagnosis)

1. Paresthesia in the territory of the median nerve
2. Night paresthesia of the hand
3. Decreased strength with hypotrophy of the musculature tenar
4. Positive tinnitus sign on the wrist
5. Positive Phalen test
6. Loss of 2-point discrimination in the region innervated by the median nerve

* Patients who agree to participate, after having been adequately informed about the nature of the study, and have reading and signed the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with prior history of cervical spine diseases (radiculopathies, arthrosis),
* Pregnant women and puerperal women,
* Patients with sequelae of previous wrist and hand surgeries,
* Other upper limb compressive syndromes and scapular girdles will be excluded
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Federal University of São Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Alvorada

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

João Carlos Belloti

PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Aldo Okamura, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Alvorada de Moema

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aldo Okamura

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mckee DE, Lalonde DH, Thoma A, Dickson L. Achieving the optimal epinephrine effect in wide awake hand surgery using local anesthesia without a tourniquet. Hand (N Y). 2015 Dec;10(4):613-5. doi: 10.1007/s11552-015-9759-6. Epub 2015 Apr 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26568713 (View on PubMed)

Davison PG, Cobb T, Lalonde DH. The patient's perspective on carpal tunnel surgery related to the type of anesthesia: a prospective cohort study. Hand (N Y). 2013 Mar;8(1):47-53. doi: 10.1007/s11552-012-9474-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24426892 (View on PubMed)

Lalonde D, Bell M, Benoit P, Sparkes G, Denkler K, Chang P. A multicenter prospective study of 3,110 consecutive cases of elective epinephrine use in the fingers and hand: the Dalhousie Project clinical phase. J Hand Surg Am. 2005 Sep;30(5):1061-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.05.006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16182068 (View on PubMed)

Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, Daltroy LH, Hohl GG, Fossel AH, Katz JN. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Nov;75(11):1585-92. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199311000-00002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8245050 (View on PubMed)

Leblanc MR, Lalonde J, Lalonde DH. A detailed cost and efficiency analysis of performing carpal tunnel surgery in the main operating room versus the ambulatory setting in Canada. Hand (N Y). 2007 Dec;2(4):173-8. doi: 10.1007/s11552-007-9043-5. Epub 2007 May 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18780048 (View on PubMed)

Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6880820 (View on PubMed)

Robles DS, Esteves S, Liça M, Lopes D, Lima S, Sousa C. Tratamento da síndrome do túnel cárpico:anestesia geral versus local?. Rev Port Ortop e Traum 23(3):217-224, 2015.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Okamura A, Moraes VY, Fernandes M, Raduan-Neto J, Belloti JC. WALANT versus intravenous regional anesthesia for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. Sao Paulo Med J. 2021 Oct 11;139(6):576-578. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2020.0583.R2.0904221. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34644765 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HAMAO01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.