Anesthesia Tumescent for Surgical Management of Tenosynovitis.

NCT ID: NCT03914235

Last Updated: 2019-04-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-08-01

Study Completion Date

2019-04-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the tumescent anesthesia technique in the surgical management of hand tenosynovitis. For this, an open clinical trial was conducted, which included patients with hand tenosynovitis (carpal tunnel syndrome, trigger finger and Quervain syndrome), which were randomly assigned to a group. The control group was released pulleys and ligaments with local anesthetic technique and hemostasis with pneumatic tourniquet; While the study group was released from the pulleys and ligaments with tumescent anesthesia. The study variables were: anesthesia time, trans-surgical bleeding, pain, total procedure time and tissue reperfusion time.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction: The WALANT technique (Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No-Torniquet) proposes the use of local anesthesia, epinephrine and tourniquet in the areas of the hand to be repaired, making costs and time and comfort more efficient.

Objective: Evaluation of the effectiveness of the WALANT technique versus regional anesthesia with tourniquet in pain control, surgical management of stenosing tenosynovitis.

Material and methods: Open clinical trial including patients with the trigger finger, tunnel syndrome in the operating room, candidates for surgery, and excluding previous surgeries at the site of the injury, hemodynamic instability, peripheral vascular diseases, smoking, anxiety, or psychiatric diseases. The anesthetic method was applied to the incision sites according to the diagnosis and the proposed procedure. At the end of the test, tumescent solution and control, 1% lidocaine plus pneumatic tourniquet on the forearm at 250mmHg. The main variables were: type of anesthesia and pain during the procedure. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied (xi2, t-student or Mann-Whitney U).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tenosynovitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tumescent anesthesia

A tumescent solution was prepared; consisting of 40 cc of 0.9% Saline Solution, 10 cc of 2% Lidocaine, 0.4 cc of Epinephrine (1: 1000) and 4 cc of 7.5% Sodium Bicarbonate. This solution was applied in the incision sites according to the diagnosis and the proposed procedure. In case of trigger finger, 3 cc was applied subcutaneously in the proximal palmar crease of the affected finger; for Quervain syndrome, 5 to 6 cc of tumescent solution was injected along the first extensor compartment at the radial styloid level; and in the case of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, 10 cc of tumescent solution was infiltrated on the flexor retinaculum in the subcutaneous tissue and from 7 to 10 cc below it. Subsequently, 20 minutes were waited for the epinephrine to cause vasoconstriction, and the asepsis of the limb was continued , sterile fields were placed, the incision site was corroborated and the surgical procedure proposed for each pathology was started.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tumescent Anesthesia

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

A tumescent solution is prepared with 2% lidocaine (10ml), 1:1000 epinephrine (0.4ml) and 7.5% sodium bicarbonate (4ml) dissolved in 0.9% saline solution (40ml) and applied from 3 to 20ml (depending on the pathology to be repaired) at the incision site.

Open release of the tendon

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard surgical procedure for carpal tunnel syndrome, trigger finger and Quervain syndrome.

Local anesthesia with tourniquet.

Lidocaine 1% was applied to the incision sites according to the diagnosis and the proposed procedure. In case of trigger finger, 3 cc was applied subcutaneously in the proximal palmar crease of the affected finger; for Quervain syndrome, 5 to 6 cc were injected along the first extensor compartment at the radial styloid level; and in the case of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, 10 cc was infiltrated on the flexor retinaculum in the subcutaneous tissue and from 7 to 10 cc below it. Afterwards, a pneumatic tourniquet was placed at the level of the forearm at 250 mmHg after exsanguination with a bandage from Esmarch. The asepsis of the limb was continued, sterile fields were placed, the incision site was corroborated and the surgical procedure proposed for each pathology was started.

At the end of the surgical procedure, it was closed by planes, a soft bandage was placed, the tourniquet was removed and the patient was taken to recovery.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Apply 3 to 20 ml at the incision site, depending on the pathology to be repaired(carpal tunnel syndrome, trigger finger or Quervain syndrome).

Pneumatic tourniquet

Intervention Type DEVICE

Level of the forearm at 250 mmHg, after exsanguination with Esmarch bandage.

Open release of the tendon

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard surgical procedure for carpal tunnel syndrome, trigger finger and Quervain syndrome.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tumescent Anesthesia

A tumescent solution is prepared with 2% lidocaine (10ml), 1:1000 epinephrine (0.4ml) and 7.5% sodium bicarbonate (4ml) dissolved in 0.9% saline solution (40ml) and applied from 3 to 20ml (depending on the pathology to be repaired) at the incision site.

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Lidocaine

Apply 3 to 20 ml at the incision site, depending on the pathology to be repaired(carpal tunnel syndrome, trigger finger or Quervain syndrome).

Intervention Type DRUG

Pneumatic tourniquet

Level of the forearm at 250 mmHg, after exsanguination with Esmarch bandage.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Open release of the tendon

Standard surgical procedure for carpal tunnel syndrome, trigger finger and Quervain syndrome.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lidocaine 1%

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Right holders of the Mexican Social Security Institute
* Over 18 years
* Trigger Finger Diagnosis
* Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
* Diagnosis of Quervain Syndrome
* Acceptance and signature of informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Necessity for concomitant surgery
* Previous surgeries on the injured site
* Hemodynamic instability
* History of peripheral vascular diseases
* Do not wish to participate in the study
* Hypersensitivity to medication
* Smoking
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

CLOTILDE FUENTES OROZCO

Investigador de tiempo completo

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clotilde Fuentes Orozco, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Western Medical Center, Mexican Institute of Social Security

Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Mexico

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R-2018-1301-021

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.