The Safety and Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.
NCT ID: NCT06984731
Last Updated: 2025-05-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
210 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-04-21
2028-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Left Atrial Appendage Velocity on Left Atrial Structure and Function After Radiofrequency Ablation Combined With Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion
NCT04693871
Combining Left Atrial Appendage Closure With Cryoballoon Ablation in Chinese Population
NCT04185142
A New Approach for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
NCT05989321
Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Under Totally Thoracoscope
NCT00844584
LAAO Versus NOAC in Patients with AF and PCI
NCT05353140
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Moreover, both international and national guidelines for arrhythmia management indicate that rhythm control and stroke prevention are equally important for patients with atrial fibrillation. Although left atrial ear closure is effective in reducing the risk of stroke associated with atrial fibrillation, it does not address arrhythmia in patients. For heart rhythm control, catheter ablation is one of the most effective treatments available. It has been proven to significantly improve sinus rhythm maintenance and quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation in several randomized controlled trials (RCTS). These studies suggest that catheter ablation is the preferred method for rhythm control in patients with paroxysmal AF, with better long-term results than medical treatment.
To comprehensively solve the problem of rhythm control and stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, the combination of catheter ablation and left atrial ear closure is a feasible and promising treatment strategy. Catheter ablation is designed to restore sinus rhythm by interfering with the triggering mechanism of atrial fibrillation, while left atrial appendage closure reduces stroke risk by isolating the main site of thrombosis. The combination of the two surgical methods not only improves the rate of sinus rhythm maintenance in patients but also significantly reduces the risk of stroke and all-cause death.
At present, the combined application of these two surgeries is gradually increasing in clinical practice. Some studies and expert consensus suggest that combined treatment goals can be achieved through "one-stop surgery" (performing both catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure in one procedure) or phased surgery (performing one procedure before the other). However, there is no consensus on the optimal surgical sequence. Some studies have shown that "one-stop" surgery may shorten the length of hospital stay, and reduce surgical risks and patients' economic burden in the same period \[13\]. A phased procedure allows doctors to better evaluate the results after the initial surgery and reduce the overall surgical risk for the patient.
In the consensus of atrial fibrillation management experts in China in 2021, Category Ⅱb recommendation for "one-stop surgery" was proposed, suggesting that for some patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who have indications of both catheter ablation and left atrial artery occlusion, it is reasonable to perform left atrial artery occlusion at the same time of catheter ablation. Despite this, there is currently a lack of trials to verify the safety and effectiveness of different surgical sequences.
Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of transcranial atrial fibrillation ablation with WATCHMAN FLX 1 month after left atrial appendicular closure, to provide evidence-based medical evidence for optimizing the comprehensive management of patients with atrial fibrillation, and to further explore the optimal combined application strategy of the two surgical methods in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental group
Patients who meet the diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation and plan to receive sequential treatment of WATCHMAN FLX left atrial appendage occlusion and transcatheter atrial fibrillation ablation.
left atrial appendage closure
Patients with atrial fibrillation underwent transcatheter radiofrequency cardiac ablation 1 month after left atrial appendage closure with WATCHMAN FLX
radiofrequency ablation
Patients with atrial fibrillation underwent transcatheter radiofrequency cardiac ablation 1 month after left atrial appendage closure with WATCHMAN FLX
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
left atrial appendage closure
Patients with atrial fibrillation underwent transcatheter radiofrequency cardiac ablation 1 month after left atrial appendage closure with WATCHMAN FLX
radiofrequency ablation
Patients with atrial fibrillation underwent transcatheter radiofrequency cardiac ablation 1 month after left atrial appendage closure with WATCHMAN FLX
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Meet the indications for receiving WATCHMAN FLX left atrial appendicular closure and transcatheter atrial fibrillation ablation;
3. Preoperative imaging evaluation showed that the anatomical structure of the left atrial appendage was suitable for implantation with the WATCHMAN FLX device;
4. The patient agrees to participate in the study and signs the informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
2. left auricular thrombus or acute thrombotic event was found before surgery;
3. Patients with severe bleeding tendency or recent major bleeding events (such as massive gastrointestinal bleeding, cerebral hemorrhage, etc.);
4. Patients who are unable to complete postoperative follow-up (such as life expectancy of less than 1 year or poor compliance);
5. Other serious diseases (such as liver and kidney failure, active infection, etc.) were found in preoperative examination;
6. Pregnant or lactating women.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Affiliated hospital of Nantong University
Nantong, Jiangsu, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Jian Zhang MD
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2025-K080-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.