Adverse Adolescent Pathways to Substance Use

NCT ID: NCT06977178

Last Updated: 2025-05-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

180 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-20

Study Completion Date

2030-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Purpose: This 5-year R01 study will elucidate the role of maturational change across adolescence in neural connectivity and physiological stress responses in the relationship between anxiety and adverse pathways to substance use (APSU). Participants: Children (N=200) aged 12-14 with symptoms of anxiety and their legal caregiver will be recruited from clinical and community sources. Procedures: Youth participants will complete several questionnaires and interviews, undergo neuroimaging while performing cognitive tasks, and have their heart rate and skin conductance monitored during a mildly stressful task. Caregivers will complete several questionnaires.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The conceptual model proposes that the relationship between anxiety symptomatology and Adverse Patterns of Substance Use (APSU: age of onset, cumulative exposure, severity, and polydrug use) is a function of acute stress reactivity that is underpinned by specific neurobiological and neurocognitive factors measurable at a drug- and alcohol-naïve baseline. Youth at high risk for APSU will be over-sampled using parent and child-reported screeners that include items relating to emotion dysregulation, behavioral impulsivity, susceptibility to peer pressure, friends' conduct problems, and other risk-relevant characteristics to define a high-APSU-risk prodrome. Risk status will be measured as a continuous trait using well-tested thresholds for high and low risk for APSU, and the recruitment strategy will ensure sufficient variability on this axis. This approach ensures a sufficient number of youth will initiate and escalate SU within the time frame of the study, allowing the investigators to assess precursors APSU in high risk youth as a function of anxiety symptomatology and acute stress reactivity, using feasible and adequately powered methods.

To test hypotheses, the investigators will prospectively assess acute stress responsivity, anxiety symptoms, specific neural connectivity patterns, and APSU in a sample of 180 substance-naïve youth beginning in early adolescence (age 12-14, Tanner Stage \>3) and two additional 12 month waves of data collection. Participants will complete an acute stress task outside the scanner with psychophysiological monitoring and a resting and performance based MRI session using impulsivity (fronto-striatal-thalamic circuitry), negative valence (threat circuitry), and attention bias (shifting from threat to frontal circuitry) tasks. At each wave, all surveys, cognitive tests, stress physiological, clinical and neuroimaging measures will be assessed. A final online exit survey in year 5 will be conducted simultaneously for all participants to evaluate clinical symptoms and end-point APSU.

The proposed prospective, longitudinal design is novel, creative, and timely. Brain imaging studies of this type are typically quite small, often due to cost limitations, and are only able to accurately model a small subset of factors and covariates. The investigators plan to evaluate the complexity of the problem with targeted variables that will be well-defined in the sample and tracked over time in relation to APSU in an atypically large sample for neuroimaging. This design will enable within- and between-subject comparisons that prospectively: (1) characterize substance use pathways (e.g., nature and extent of use over time) in the context of neurobiological and neurocognitive mechanisms associated with physiological responses to acute stress that underlie anxiety symptoms, (2) tracks developmental change in these processes, and (3) differentiates between potentially distinctive neural pathways that influence progression to APSU.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anxiety Adolescent Development Substance Use

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

The Trier Social Stress Test for Children (TSST-C 61)-- a social stressor involving story telling in front of two neutral judges, preparation time and a cognitive stressor involving mental arithmetic-counting backward from 1023 by 13s--will be used to elicit physiological stress responses.
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Trier Social Stress Test (TSST)

The Trier Social Stress Test for Children (TSST-C) is a social stressor involving story telling in front of two neutral judges, preparation time and a cognitive stressor involving mental arithmetic-counting backward from 1023 by 13s. It is used to elicit physiological stress responses. The TSST-C is administered in 4 parts: an anticipatory stress phase (5 min to prepare the speech); the speech task (5 min), the arithmetic task (5 min), and the recovery phase (up through 40 min post-task).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Trier Social Stress Test

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Psychosocial stress procedure; 5 minutes of public speaking (preceded by 5 minutes of preparation) and 5 minutes of mental arithmetic.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Trier Social Stress Test

Psychosocial stress procedure; 5 minutes of public speaking (preceded by 5 minutes of preparation) and 5 minutes of mental arithmetic.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female
* 12-14 years old,
* Report symptoms of anxiety
* Understand and sign an assent, and parents will sign a permission and a consent document in English
* Meets study hearing and vision requirements
* Substance use naïve

Exclusion Criteria

* Has any foreign metal objects or implants as determined by the safety questionnaires (e.g., bone screws, shunts or body piercing that can't be removed, etc.)
* Has been diagnosed with psychosis or a severe emotional disturbance.
* Has used alcohol, tobacco, or marijuana more than 3 times.
* Is pregnant. Girls who self-report pregnancy may not participate in the stress evaluation or the MRI scan.
* Is taking any medications that directly alter cardiovascular function (e.g., propranolol or other beta blockers).
* Any current or lifetime treatment with antipsychotic medication.
* Has had a head injury that resulted in a loss of consciousness for more than 5 minutes.
* Is planning to get non-removable metal braces.
* Impaired intellectual functioning (full-scale intelligence quotient \<70).
* Past or current history of a clinically significant central nervous system that could confound brain imaging evaluations.
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

14 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

RTI International

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Aysenil Belger, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Aysenil Belger, PhD

Role: CONTACT

(919)-260-9822‬

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Aysenil Belger, PhD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5R01DA057312-02

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

23-1572

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Stress and Resilience
NCT06457841 RECRUITING NA