Comparison of Automatic and Manual Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure Monitoring in Pediatric Intensive Care Patients

NCT ID: NCT06965400

Last Updated: 2025-11-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-02

Study Completion Date

2025-08-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This prospective, randomized controlled cross-over study compares automatic (IntelliCuff®) and manual methods of endotracheal tube cuff pressure (CP) monitoring in pediatric intensive care patients. The study evaluates the frequency and duration of cuff pressure deviations outside the recommended range (15-25 cmH₂O) and assesses the impact on nursing workload.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Optimal cuff pressure management in pediatric patients undergoing mechanical ventilation is critical to prevent complications such as aspiration pneumonia or tracheal injuries. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of continuous automatic cuff pressure monitoring using the IntelliCuff® system versus standard manual cuff pressure monitoring performed by nurses every 2 hours.

Patients aged between 1 month and 18 years requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours participated in a cross-over study at two tertiary pediatric intensive care units. Each patient underwent two consecutive 24-hour monitoring periods: one with automatic cuff pressure monitoring and another with manual monitoring. Data collected included the frequency and total duration of low (\<15 cmH₂O) and high (\>25 cmH₂O) pressure episodes, number of manual corrections required, and total nursing intervention time.

This study aims to determine whether automatic monitoring provides better control of cuff pressure, reduces the frequency of cuff-related complications, and decreases nursing workload compared to manual monitoring.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cuff Pressure Mechanical Ventilation Pediatric Intensive Care

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

48 hours total (24 hours each phase, manual vs. automatic)
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Manual Cuff Pressure Monitoring

In this arm, cuff pressure was manually measured and adjusted every 2 hours by nurses using a manometer, to maintain a target pressure between 15 and 25 cmH₂O over a 24-hour period.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Automatic Cuff Pressure Control

Intervention Type DEVICE

he IntelliCuff® system (Hamilton Medical, Switzerland) continuously monitored and automatically adjusted cuff pressure to keep it within the target range of 15-25 cmH₂O. Manual intervention was only required upon system alert.

Automatic Cuff Pressure Monitoring

In this phase, endotracheal tube cuff pressure was continuously monitored using the IntelliCuff® system (Hamilton Medical, Switzerland), which automatically adjusted the pressure to maintain it within the target range of 15-25 cmH₂O. Nurses intervened only if the system alerted due to a deviation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Automatic Cuff Pressure Control

Intervention Type DEVICE

he IntelliCuff® system (Hamilton Medical, Switzerland) continuously monitored and automatically adjusted cuff pressure to keep it within the target range of 15-25 cmH₂O. Manual intervention was only required upon system alert.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Automatic Cuff Pressure Control

he IntelliCuff® system (Hamilton Medical, Switzerland) continuously monitored and automatically adjusted cuff pressure to keep it within the target range of 15-25 cmH₂O. Manual intervention was only required upon system alert.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

IntelliCuff System

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged between 1 month and 18 years who were intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube and expected to require invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours were eligible for inclusion

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with tracheostomy, known tracheal pathology, extubated within 48 hours, or those requiring frequent ventilator adjustments due to clinical instability were excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Month

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hamilton Medical AG

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dr. Behcet Uz Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hasan ağın

Prof.Dr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hasan Agin, Prof.Dr.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Dr. Behcet Uz Children's Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aydin Obstetric and pediatrics Hospital

Aydin, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Cam Sakura Research and Training Hospital

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Acibadem University, Acibadem Altunizade Hospital

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

The Health Sciences University Izmir Behçet Uz Child Health and Diseases Research and Training Hospital

Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Topjian AA, Raymond TT, Atkins D, Chan M, Duff JP, Joyner BL Jr, Lasa JJ, Lavonas EJ, Levy A, Mahgoub M, Meckler GD, Roberts KE, Sutton RM, Schexnayder SM; Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support Collaborators. Part 4: Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_2):S469-S523. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000901. Epub 2020 Oct 21. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33081526 (View on PubMed)

Vottier G, Matrot B, Jones P, Dauger S. A cross-over study of continuous tracheal cuff pressure monitoring in critically-ill children. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Jan;42(1):132-3. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4103-8. Epub 2015 Oct 29. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26515515 (View on PubMed)

Dauvergne JE, Geffray AL, Asehnoune K, Rozec B, Lakhal K. Automatic regulation of the endotracheal tube cuff pressure with a portable elastomeric device. A randomised controlled study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2020 Jun;39(3):435-441. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.04.007. Epub 2020 May 4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32376293 (View on PubMed)

Zhu G, Wang X, Cao X, Yang C, Wang B, Ang Y, Duan M. The effect of different endotracheal tube cuff pressure monitoring systems on postoperative sore throat in patients undergoing tracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Mar 25;24(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02499-5.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 38528475 (View on PubMed)

Chenelle CT, Oto J, Sulemanji D, Fisher DF, Kacmarek RM. Evaluation of an automated endotracheal tube cuff controller during simulated mechanical ventilation. Respir Care. 2015 Feb;60(2):183-90. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03387. Epub 2014 Nov 25.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25425705 (View on PubMed)

Alzahrani AR, Al Abbasi S, Abahoussin OK, Al Shehri TO, Al-Dorzi HM, Tamim HM, Sadat M, Arabi YM. Prevalence and predictors of out-of-range cuff pressure of endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes: a prospective cohort study in mechanically ventilated patients. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Oct 15;15:147. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0132-7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26471790 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024/896

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ETT Cuff Leak: TV Ratios
NCT02768831 COMPLETED NA