Replication Study: Reducing Pain With Focused Music Listening

NCT ID: NCT06960226

Last Updated: 2025-05-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

61 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-03-01

Study Completion Date

2025-04-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to confirm previous findings that actively tapping along to music can reduce pain more than just listening to music. This study aims to replicate the findings of a previous study (NCT05267795), with one change in how mild pain is created for the experiment. This study involves healthy adults.

The main questions the study aims to answer are:

1. Does actively tapping along to music lower feelings of pain compared to just listening to music?
2. Does actively tapping along to music lower feelings of pain compared to being in silence (with or without tapping)?
3. Is this method of using music and tapping helpful for managing pain?

Researchers will compare the amount of pain participants feel in four different situations:

1. Listening to music while actively tapping their foot along with it.
2. Just listening to music while resting their foot.
3. Actively tapping their foot in silence.
4. Sitting in silence while resting their foot.

Participants in this study will:

Experience brief moments of mild pain on their forearm. This pain is safely created using a small electrical pulse from a device held gently on the skin by the researcher. (This replaces the pressure method used in the original study).

Sometimes listen to music through headphones, and sometimes sit in silence. Sometimes tap their foot along to the music or a beat, and sometimes rest their foot. Rate how much pain they feel on a number scale after each pain pulse. Answer short questions about their mood during the experiment. Answer questions about how familiar they are with the music and how much they liked it at the end.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a pre-registered replication of a previous trial (NCT05267795) investigating the analgesic effects of sensorimotor synchronization to music. While music listening alone has shown small, albeit reliable, pain-reducing effects, recent theories propose that active synchronization (like tapping or dancing) engages the endogenous opioid system (EOS), potentially leading to stronger analgesia and enhanced social bonding. The original study provided initial evidence supporting this, finding that actively tapping to music significantly reduced experimentally induced pain compared to passive music listening or silence conditions.

This replication study aims to confirm the primary finding that sensorimotor synchronization to music significantly reduces pain perception compared to passive music listening and control conditions. The study employs a 2x2 within-subjects factorial design with two factors: Auditory Condition (Music vs. Silence) and Task Condition (Active Tapping vs. Passive Control). Healthy adult participants will undergo all four conditions.

The primary methodological difference from the original study is the method of pain induction. Instead of pressure algometry, this study will use non-invasive transcutaneous electrical stimulation applied to the participant's forearm via a BIOPAC HSTM01 certified stimulus device. This change was implemented to allow for potentially greater precision and control over the stimulus intensity compared to manual pressure application. Pain intensity will be individually calibrated for each participant based on their pain threshold, ensuring only mild to moderate pain levels are experienced. Safety protocols, including screening for contraindications (e.g., pacemakers, epilepsy, pregnancy, local malignancies) and continuous monitoring, are in place.

Consistent with the original study, perceived pain intensity will be the primary outcome measure, rated on a numerical scale after each stimulus. Secondary measures, including ratings of emotional state (pleasantness, arousal), music familiarity, and music preference, will be collected to explore potential attentional and emotional mechanisms underlying the observed effects, as suggested by the original research. This replication seeks to provide robust evidence regarding the potential for active musical engagement, specifically sensorimotor synchronization, as a tool for pain management.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Pain Management Pain Threshold Painful Pain Intensity Pain Intervention Psychomotor Performance Healthy Volunteers

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

All participants experience all conditions within a 2x2 within-subjects factorial design. Factors crossed are: 1. Auditory Condition (Music versus Silence) and 2. Task Condition (Active Sensorimotor Synchronization versus Passive Control). The Active task involves participants synchronizing movements (e.g., foot tapping, head nodding) to music or a pacing stimulus. The Passive task requires participants to remain still without performing these specific movements. This results in four experimental conditions: Music+Active, Music+Passive (Listening only), Silence+Active, and Silence+Passive. The order of these conditions is counterbalanced across participants. Brief, non-invasive electrical pain stimuli are delivered to the forearm during experimental trials.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Within-Subjects Conditions

All participants experience all conditions in a 2x2 within-subjects factorial design. Interventions manipulate two factors: 1. Auditory Condition: Participants listen to selected music (via headphones) or experience silence. 2. Task Condition: Participants perform Active Sensorimotor Synchronization (syncing foot taps/head nods to music or pacing stimulus) or maintain Passive Control (remaining still). Each participant completes trials for all 4 resulting conditions: Music+Active, Music+Passive, Silence+Active, Silence+Passive. Condition order is counterbalanced across participants. During trials, brief non-invasive electrical pain stimuli (BIOPAC system) are delivered to the forearm; intensity is individually calibrated based on pain threshold. Key outcomes (perceived pain, emotional state ratings) are collected.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Music Listening

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants listen to selected instrumental music excerpts presented via headphones during designated experimental trials.

Silence Control

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants experience periods of silence with no music presented via headphones during designated control trials. This serves as the auditory control condition compared to Music Listening.

Active Sensorimotor Synchronization

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants actively synchronize movements (such as foot tapping and/or head nodding) by timing them with the rhythm of the presented music or with a pacing stimulus provided during silent trials.

Passive Control Task

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants remain still and do not perform specific instructed synchronized movements during designated control trials. This serves as the motor task control condition compared to Active Sensorimotor Synchronization.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Music Listening

Participants listen to selected instrumental music excerpts presented via headphones during designated experimental trials.

Intervention Type OTHER

Silence Control

Participants experience periods of silence with no music presented via headphones during designated control trials. This serves as the auditory control condition compared to Music Listening.

Intervention Type OTHER

Active Sensorimotor Synchronization

Participants actively synchronize movements (such as foot tapping and/or head nodding) by timing them with the rhythm of the presented music or with a pacing stimulus provided during silent trials.

Intervention Type OTHER

Passive Control Task

Participants remain still and do not perform specific instructed synchronized movements during designated control trials. This serves as the motor task control condition compared to Active Sensorimotor Synchronization.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 years or older
* Self-reported good general health
* Able to understand study procedures and provide informed consent
* Normal or corrected-to-normal hearing (sufficient for music perception)

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindications for Electrical Stimulation:

* Presence of active electronic implants (e.g., cardiac pacemaker, cochlear implant)
* Pregnancy (self-reported)
* History of Epilepsy or seizure disorder
* Presence of local malignancy (especially near the stimulation site on forearm)
* Broken skin, wounds, or significant skin conditions on the right forearm (stimulation site)
* Medical/Neurological History:

* History of significant psychiatric or neurological disease (other than epilepsy, listed above)
* History of substance dependence
* Current diagnosis of a chronic pain condition
* Medication Use:

* Current regular use of prescription analgesic (pain-relief) medication
* Current regular use of psychoactive medication
* Study-Specific:

* Self-reported musical anhedonia (inability to derive pleasure from music)
* Significant hearing impairment preventing clear perception of the music
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Research Council of Norway

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

European Research Council

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Bergen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stefan Koelsch, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Institute for Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Bergen

Bergen, , Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REK NR 2019/1031 7236

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Music Listening: A Mechanistic Trial
NCT05541029 RECRUITING NA