Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-02-28
2008-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Study hypotheses: 1) Performing a highly engaging listening task reduces psychophysiological arousal to painful stimuli. 2) Psychophysiological arousal to painful stimuli is a function of the complexity of the auditory signal. 3) Signal complexity and task difficulty interact to produce the greatest engagement and maximum reduction in psychophysiological arousal to painful stimuli.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This trial will comprise two studies and will require two days of participation. At study start, participants will have electrodes placed on a finger on their non-dominant hand and on other body parts to record skin conductance and electrical brain activity. Participants will also wear a headset to have their pupil movement measured. Tone synthesis software will be used to generate different tones. In Study 1, a familiar tune, selected by the participant, will be played against a background of varying tones. Occasionally, notes of the tune will be missing or displaced. Participants will be asked to identify the deviant notes while receiving painful fingertip shocks; they will be instructed to focus on the task and ignore the shocks. Study 1 will consist of three different conditions (easy, hard, and no condition). In the easy condition, the background tones occur far from the pitch range of the tune, making missing or displaced notes easy to detect. In the hard condition, the pitch range of the background tones will be adjacent to that of the tune, making the tune difficult to discern from the background tones. In the no task condition, participants will hear the familiar tune with random background tones, but they will be instructed to pay no attention to the tune or the tones.
Participants will report their pain experiences in both a retrospective report and a concurrent report. For the retrospective report, participants will report the highest, lowest, and average levels of pain experienced during the preceding block of trials. For the concurrent report, participants will give both a report of the level of pain experienced immediately following each shock episode. At each of the two sessions participants take part in, there will be two sets of trial blocks, one with pain reports and one without. There will be two blocks for each of the three music task conditions for a total of twelve blocks per session. Within each block, sixteen 7- to 11-second shocks will be given.
In Study 2, participants will take part in two types of listening tasks, one with only tones and one with both a tune and background tones. There will be three tasks in the tone condition (no task, easy task, and hard task). In the no task condition, participants will hear repeated tones; they will be instructed to pay no attention to the tones. In the easy condition, the deviant tones will be easily detectable; in the hard condition, they will be less detectable. During each condition, participants will receive painful fingertip shocks.
The second task condition is similar to Study 1; participants will listen to a familiar tune with various tones in the background. Participants will be given fingertip shocks and will be asked to identify deviant notes for both the easy and hard conditions. For the no task condition, participants will be instructed to pay no attention to the tune or background tones. Participants will not be required to report pain in this part of the study. Participants will receive two blocks of trials for each of the six task conditions. Fingertip shocks will vary in intensity with the interval between shocks varying between 7 and 11 seconds.
Pain self-reports (Study 1), deviant note detections, skin conductance, pupil dilation, and electroencephalogram changes following stimulations will be used to assess participants.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Electrodermal stimulation
Music listening task
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Severe allergies to skin preparations
* Psychoactive drugs
* Hypertension drugs
* Pregnancy
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
NIH
University of Utah
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
University of Utah
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David H. Bradshaw, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Utah Pain Research Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Utah Pain Research Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB 12579
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id