Deciphering Principles of Network Dynamics Underlying Depression Symptom Severity From Multi-day Intracranial Recordings in Patients With Major Depression
NCT ID: NCT06953362
Last Updated: 2025-05-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
6 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-01-01
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluating tDCS Brain-stimulation in Depression Using MRI
NCT05598034
Invasive Decoding and Stimulation of Altered Reward Computations in Depression Patients
NCT05239780
Deep Brain Stimulation for Refractory Major Depression
NCT00296920
Adjunctive Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognition in Major Depression
NCT00760097
Sleep Modulation to Treat Depression
NCT06443216
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Major depression (MDD) is a leading cause of disability worldwide, with high rates of treatment resistance. This speaks strongly for the need to improve our understanding of the causes and underlying neurobiology of this condition so that we can developed improved treatments. Our current understanding of MDD is quite limited. However, available evidence points to dysfunction in distributed neural networks, a perspective consistent with the etiological and diagnostic heterogeneity of this disorder. While imaging and electroencephalography (EEG) have helped identify MDD circuitry, no consensus has been reached on the identification of diagnostic biomarkers. Furthermore, the dynamics of MDD circuitry in relation to symptom severity is unknown. Whether there are neural signatures of circuits that define MDD symptom severity states and the extent to which these circuits are modifiable using direct electrical stimulation are unanswered questions critical for therapeutic advancement.
Intracranial EEG (iEEG) offers a promising high-resolution method to study network fundamentals and help elucidate the neural dysfunction underlying MDD. For the first time, we have the opportunity to use this technique to study circuits in MDD in patients participating in a clinical trial of personalized responsive neurostimulation for treatment resistant depression (PRESIDIO). In stage 1, participants are implanted with 160 electrodes across 10 brain sites for 10 days to target brain site placement of chronic deep brain stimulation leads in stage 2. This stage offers the unique opportunity to study principles of MDD circuits from cortical and deep brain structures over a multi-day time period. The current study capitalizes on that opportunity. It is an ancillary study to the PRESIDIO trial where we will have the opportunity to perform a set of experiments that establish basic principles of network dynamics underlying MDD from direct neural recordings.
This project is organized around the principal concept that brain circuit dysfunction is reflected in abnormal signatures of functional connectivity and rhythmic local-field activity. The overarching objective is to establish proof-of concept for two fundamental principles of circuit function in depression: i) that circuit features are related to MDD symptom severity, and ii) that perturbation with focal electrical stimulation can acutely modify these circuits. Our rationale for this study is based on: 1) preliminary work, in which we identified a set of connectivity and activity features that were predictive of a diagnosis of co-morbid depression in patients with epilepsy; 2) published work by our group that found targeted stimulation acutely changes mood and spectral power across a broad network in patients with epilepsy; and 3) pilot data for this proposal in which we establish proof-of-concept that MDD symptom severity states can be defined using a 6-question version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD6). It remains unknown whether circuit features identified in an epilepsy population are generalizable to patients with MDD in the absence of epilepsy, and the manner in which these neural features vary with symptom states - questions we can address in this proposal. We hypothesize that a set of neural connectivity and activity features will characterize symptom severity states in MDD implicating their potential to serve as a state vs. trait MDD biomarker, and that circuit features can be acutely modified by brain stimulation indicating their potential to serve as a therapy target.
Goals:
1. Aim 1. Biomarker Development: Characterize the pattern of network connectivity and activity that is associated with symptom severity. The objective of this goal is to establish proof-of concept that circuit features are related to major depressive disorder (MDD) symptom severity. Our working hypothesis is that spectral activity and connectivity within and across the amygdala, hippocampus, SGC, OFC, and VC will capture the majority of variance in MDD symptom severity. The rationale behind this goal is preliminary work that implicates corticolimbic circuit features in diagnostic biomarkers in MDD, and our pilot data showing features to be predictive of symptom state.
2. Aim 2. Acute Change with Circuit Perturbation: Characterize the capacity for brief (2-10 min) periods of targeted electrical stimulation to acutely modify connectivity and activity. The objective of this goal is to establish proof-of-concept that targeted electrical stimulation can acutely modify circuit activity and connectivity features indicating their potential to serve as therapy targets. Our working hypothesis is that graph theoretic properties of MDD network nodes will distinguish their capacity to affect network connectivity and activity following stimulation. The rationale is work by our group that found stimulation to corticolimbic targets acutely changed spectral power across a network, and that nodal properties exert predictive effects of stimulation on networks in epilepsy. A node with high outdegree is a hub of high network influence and could be indicative of a good treatment target. In contrast, a node with high indegree suggests a region that is influenced by stimulation in other regions and may play a role in sensing modifiable neural signatures of MDD.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
All Subjects
No treatment is being administered in this study. Direct neural electrical stimulation is being administered across a large number of sites in the corticolimbic network in order to determine its effects on neural network electrical activity and connectivity.
Direct Neural Electrical Stimulation
We are not delivering treatment in this study. Direct neural electrical stimulation is being administered to determine its effect on neural circuit activity and connectivity.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Direct Neural Electrical Stimulation
We are not delivering treatment in this study. Direct neural electrical stimulation is being administered to determine its effect on neural circuit activity and connectivity.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Current episode ≥ 2 years
* Treatment-resistant (4 adequate trials including electroconvulsive therapy (ECT)), 3 classes of medications, one augmentation strategy, psychotherapy) as measured by the antidepressant treatment history form (ATHF)
* Failed ECT due to inability to achieve sustained response (2 failed attempts to discontinue ECT treatment) or discontinued due to intolerable side effects
* Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of \> 26 at both baseline and screening visit
* Presence of variability on repeated administrations of depression rating scales (minimum of 2-point variation on the HAMD-6 administered 3 times a day for 3 days), which is required for the identification of a neural biomarker
* No changes to psychotropic medication regimen during the 4 weeks prior to entry into and the duration of the study
* Willing and able to undergo invasive brain recording/stimulation study
* Willing and able to attend multiple research visits and perform at-home research protocol
* Willing and able to provide informed consent
* Ability to speak and read English
Exclusion Criteria
* Generalized anxiety disorder is the primary DSM-V disorder during the current MDD episode
* Active suicidal ideation with intent and plan as defined by a score of 5 on the Columbia suicide severity rating scale (C-SSRS)
* History of suicide attempt requiring hospitalization in previous 2 years
* Meets criteria for alcohol or substance abuse or dependence (other than caffeine) in previous 6 months, determined by the SCID
* Has a personality disorder based on the investigator's assessment that the investigator believes will adversely impact subject compliance or safety
* Fibromyalgia or chronic fatigue syndrome
* Current condition requiring chronic narcotic use
* History of traumatic brain injury, another neurological disorder, or developmental delay
* History of seizures
* MRI (done within one year of the first visit) with significant abnormalities
* Previous ablative intracranial surgery or previously implanted deep brain stimulation system or any previously implanted device treatment involving brain stimulation
* Implantable hardware not compatible with MRI or with the study
* Major medical co-morbidities increasing the risk of surgery including severe diabetes, major organ system failure, history of hemorrhagic stroke, need for chronic anticoagulation other than aspirin, active infection, intracranial space occupying lesion, increased intracranial pressure, cardiovascular accident within the last month, aneurysm abnormality, retinal detachment, unstable cardiovascular disease (recent MI, severe ischemia, severe or uncontrolled hypertension), immunocompromised state, or malignancy with \< 5 years life expectancy
* Inability to stop Coumadin or platelet anti-aggregation therapy for surgery and after surgery
* Coagulopathy. Patients will be excluded unless assessed and cleared by hematology
* Allergies or known hypersensitivity to materials in the NeuroPace RNS® System (i.e. titanium, polyurethane, silicone, polyetherimide, stainless steel)
* Subject lives alone without possibility of caregiver support post-hospital stay
* Inability to comply with study follow-up visits
* Women who are pregnant, plan to become pregnant, or breast feeding
* Inability to speak and/or read English
* Inability to give consent
* Significant cognitive impairment or dementia (Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) \< 25)
22 Months
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
NIH
University of California, San Francisco
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Andrew Krystal, MD, MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Francisco
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UCSF
San Francisco, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.