Adjunctive Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognition in Major Depression
NCT ID: NCT00760097
Last Updated: 2013-02-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
18 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-09-30
2009-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) As Treatment for Major Depression
NCT02530164
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Major Depression
NCT03556124
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Therapy in Major Depression
NCT04507243
Augmenting Single-session Behavioral Activation (BA) With Delta-beta Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) for the Treatment of Depression
NCT05693922
tDCS as Adjunctive Therapy to Cognitive Stimulation in Medical Students With Depression
NCT06562387
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Several recent studies have affirmed the safety of tDCS. Iyer and colleagues (2005) showed that, in a sample of 103 subjects, no one asked for the tDCS procedure to be stopped due to discomfort. Gandiga and colleagues (2006) compared sham to active tDCS and showed no differences in self-report ratings of discomfort. Nitsche and colleagues (2004) performed structural MRI scans on healthy individuals who underwent 1 hour exposures to tDCS; they found no evidence of structural change in the brain or alterations in blood-brain barrier permeability.
With regard to persistent challenges in the management of MDD, individuals with depression have shown cognitive deficits, particularly in working memory and other frontal lobe functions (Dunkin et al., 2000; Sweeney et al., 2000 Jaeger et al., 2006; Rose and Ebmeier 2006; Rose et al., 2006) and declarative memory (e.g., Beaden et al., 2006). By improving cognitive function in subjects with cognitive complaints that persist despite pharmacotherapy, it may be possible to improve the completeness of recovery from depression and reduce any functional disability (Jaeger et al., 2006).
There are no published reports yet of the effects of tDCS on brain function in subjects with MDD. Cordance is a quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) measure which allows for non-invasive measurement of regional brain function (Leuchter et al., 1994a, 1994b, 1999; Cook et al., 1998). It is sensitive to changes in brain function in subjects who are responding to treatment for MDD (Cook and Leuchter 2001; Cook et al., 2002, 2005; Leuchter et al., 2002) and is being evaluated for use a a biomarker which predicts treatment outcome in MDD (NIMH Project R01MH069217, Cook PI). It is well suited to evaluating brain function in subjects with MDD during a clinical trial experiment.
Our hypotheses are
1. Subjects who are randomized to receive active tDCS treatments will show greater improvement in cognitive task performance than subjects who receive inactive treatments.
2. Subjects who are randomized to receive active tDCS treatments will show greater improvement in depression symptom severity scores than subjects who receive inactive treatments.
3. Subjects who are randomized to receive active tDCS treatments will show greater changes in prefrontal brain function, as assessed with quantitative EEG cordance, than subjects who receive inactive treatments.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
AtCDS
Transcranial direct stimulation
Transcranial direct stimulation
sessions of 20 minutes each
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transcranial direct stimulation
sessions of 20 minutes each
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subject meets the DSM-IV diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder based on the MINI, with a current major depressive episode in partial remission
* Subject has been receiving treatment with an antidepressant medication for ≥ 3 months at a therapeutic dose. Therapeutic doses will be operationalized as those ranges noted by the drug manufacturers in their respective Package Inserts.
* Subject's score on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Ham-D) is \> 8 despite treatment with antidepressant medication(s).
* Subject has subjective cognitive complaints.
Exclusion Criteria
* Subject suffering from a cognitive, bipolar, or psychotic disorder on the on the basis of a MINI interview; in situations where there is ambiguity about the origin of cognitive symptoms (i.e. depression with cognitive symptoms VS early dementia) subjects will not be enrolled.
* Subject meeting criteria for an Axis II diagnosis that would interfere with completion of the protocol
* Known drug dependency or substance abuse within the past six months
* Subject has had a course of ECT, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), or Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) within the six months prior to enrollment
* Unstable medical illness, any history of seizures, brain surgery, skull fracture, significant head trauma, or previous abnormal EEG
* Ham-D score \> 25 despite pharmacotherapy
* Subject is a UCLA student or staff member directly under instruction or employment of any of the investigators
* Subject has a medical illness which might be exacerbated by tDCS treatments (e.g. skin abrasions or infection of the scalp might be exacerbated by the placement of the saline-moistened electrode pads)
* Subject is using any of the following medications which interfere with EEG measures of brain function: Anticholinergics, Barbiturates, Benzodiazepines, Sedating Antihistamines (e.g. diphenhydramine (Benadryl) would be exclusionary, but not loratadine (Claritin)).
* Subject declines to give the study personnel permission to discuss their depression and participation in this study with their treating physician.
* Subject has had a suicide attempt or other self-injurious behavior in the past 6 months
* Subject has an implanted pacemaker
* Subject has red/green colorblindness (cannot distinguish red from green)
* Subject's intake urine test is positive for drugs of abuse
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, Los Angeles
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ian A. Cook, M.D.
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ian Cook, Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, Los Angeles
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience
Los Angeles, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
aTDCS in MDD
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.