Clinical Performance Evaluation of the Artificial Intelligence (AI)/ Machine Learning (ML) Technologies Utilized by the Origin Medical EXAM ASSISTANT
NCT ID: NCT06952439
Last Updated: 2025-10-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
551 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-03-19
2025-05-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
SELF-GYN1 (Sonograms Enable Looking Forward- Get Your iNformation 1 Trial)
NCT05443698
Assessing Demographic Biases in Deep Learning Model for Fetal Growth Estimation in Clinical Practice. Patients Eligible for Inclusion Are Women with a Gestational Age Between 24-42 Weeks Undergoing a Third-trimester Growth Scan. the Image Data from the Scan Are Used to Calculate Fetal Weight.
NCT06314178
Human-AI Collaborative Intelligence for Improving Fetal Flow Management
NCT06371859
Optimization of Fetal Biometry With 3D Ultrasound and Image Recognition
NCT03812471
BIOmetric MEasurements in Diagnostics: Comparison of EXperts and IA-assisted Residents
NCT06892327
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A multicenter, prospective observational study shall be conducted for the performance assessment and validation of the AI/ML technologies used in OMEA for the automated assessment of the first-trimester standard fetal ultrasound examinations. A prospective dataset of at least n=289 fetal ultrasound examinations shall be collected from pregnant participants with 11 weeks 0 days to 13 weeks 6 days weeks of gestational age (first trimester).
Study Objectives:
This study aims to evaluate the performance of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) / Machine Learning (ML) technologies utilized in OMEA for the:
1. Automated detection of standard diagnostic views in accordance with practice guidelines;
2. Automated verification of quality criteria required for the interpretation of diagnostic views in accordance with practice guidelines;
Note: Quality criteria can pertain to the following:
1. Presence/Absence of anatomical landmarks/structures identified within the diagnostic views detected
2. Verification of imaging parameters (e.g., magnification)
3. Verification of clinical features (e.g., orientation of the fetus)
3. Automated caliper placements to obtain measurements in accordance with practice guidelines;
Compliance with HIPAA Guidelines:
All data obtained will be de-identified according to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) guidelines. The sponsor will be responsible for the storage, management, and security of the de-identified data collected. To protect patient privacy, all data collected for the study undergoes de-identification, ensuring the removal of any identifiable patient information. Each data entry is assigned a unique patient number, which serves as the sole identifier for the study. The link between patient numbers and patient identifiers is securely maintained and accessible only to the principal investigator (PI) and research staff at the study site location. This link is strictly confidential and is not shared with other individuals involved in the study. Its purpose is solely for the site's reference, enabling follow-up with medical records if required. By implementing these measures, the study maintains a high level of confidentiality, safeguarding patient identities while allowing for essential record-keeping and potential future reference.
Sample Size Considerations:
Approximately 500 participants will be recruited for the study, the details of which will be captured in a statistical analysis plan that will be submitted to the FDA.
Study Design and Workflow:
The data for the study is collected in line with the Data Collection Plan and the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The ARDMS performing the routine first-trimester ultrasound scan will be trained on the Image Acquisition Protocol and the Maternal Fetal Medicine (MFM)/reading physicians performing clinical benchmarking will be guided through the Reading Physician Training Manual for ensuring standardized data capture and clinical benchmarking processes for evaluating the standalone performance of the AI/ML technologies used in OMEA. All the above mentioned documents will be submitted to the FDA as part of the premarket submission review.
Phase 1: Data Capture:
At each study site, informed consent will be provided and obtained from eligible participants, and the following information will be collected.
Patient Details:
1. Fetal gestational age
2. Maternal age
3. Maternal BMI
4. Race/Ethnicity
5. Confirmation of diagnosis of fetal anomaly/syndrome prior to the study exam and post the study exam
Site Details:
1. Site location
2. Sonographer name
3. Ultrasound scanner manufacturer and series
Images and cines captured on the ultrasound machine (IUS): Registered diagnostic medical sonographers shall conduct routine first-trimester scans as per the Image Acquisition Protocol.
Images and cines captured through the capture card (ICC): A screen capture/recording of the entire exam performed by the sonographer as per the Image Acquisition Protocol will be obtained, and the images/cines required for the study that correspond to IUS will be obtained. The independent research coordinator from Origin Medical for the study will review the screen recording and identify the frame/cine for each diagnostic view (ICC) that corresponds to IUS based time stamps.
An independent quality reviewer from Origin Medical will verify whether the corresponding pair (i.e., captured on an ultrasound machine vs. obtained through screen recording) of frames/cine for each diagnostic view has been extracted or not.
Phase 2: Clinical Benchmarking and Statistical Analysis
All images/cines (IUS) from all patient exams that meet the study eligibility criteria will be pooled and randomized to prepare the ground truth by an independent Reading Panel (MFM physicians).
AI/ML technologies of OMEA interpretation of ICC The frozen AL/ML technologies used in OMEA shall interpret the images/cines (ICC).
For the sake of clarity, the ICC refers to the images/cines extracted from screen recordings using a capture card that correspond to the same images/cines as obtained by the ARDMS on the ultrasound machine.
The following tasks shall be performed by the AI/ML technologies on ICC:
1. Automated detection of standard diagnostic views;
2. Automated verification of quality criteria required for interpretation of diagnostic views ;
3. Automated caliper placements to obtain fetal measurements;
The performance of the AI/ML technologies used in the OMEA (on all ICC images/ cines that meet the study eligibility criteria) shall be compared against the ground truth for statistical analysis, i.e., against the majority consensus obtained from the Reading Panel for detection of diagnostic views, verification of quality criteria, performing fetal biometry measurements and ACEP grading of the images/cines.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Images and cines captured on the ultrasound machine (IUS)
American registered diagnostic medical sonographers (ARDMS; single operator/ultrasound scan room) shall conduct routine first-trimester scans as per the Image Acquisition Protocol for the FDA Study.
Note: Patient exams that do not meet the study eligibility criteria, as identified or observed by the ARDMS, will be excluded at this stage. The exclusion criteria identified or observed by the sonographer are as follows:
1. Intrauterine fetal demise
2. Multiple gestations
3. Incorrect GA identified
4. Sonographer identifies structural abnormalities
5. Inability to continue the exam by the sonographer/patient Only the image frames and cine(s) from exams that satisfy the study inclusion criteria will be collected.
Images and cines captured through the capture card (ICC)
A screen capture/recording of the entire exam performed by the ARDMS as per the Image Acquisition Protocol for the FDA Study will be obtained, and the images/cines required for the study that correspond to IUS shall be obtained. The independent research coordinator for the study will review the screen recording and identify the frame/cine for each diagnostic view (ICC) that corresponds to IUS based on the time stamps.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Images and cines captured through the capture card (ICC)
A screen capture/recording of the entire exam performed by the ARDMS as per the Image Acquisition Protocol for the FDA Study will be obtained, and the images/cines required for the study that correspond to IUS shall be obtained. The independent research coordinator for the study will review the screen recording and identify the frame/cine for each diagnostic view (ICC) that corresponds to IUS based on the time stamps.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. BMI \< 40 kg/m2
3. Live non-anomalous singleton pregnancies
4. Gestational age between 11 weeks + 0 days and 13 weeks + 6 days, as determined by:
Last menstrual period (LMP) or, Ultrasound report if the the LMP date is uncertain Note: Gestational age determination follows standard American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) guidelines.
5. Informed consent is obtained from the participant
6. Exams obtained as per the Image Acquisition Protocol
Exclusion Criteria
2. Cases with fetal demise or other fetal abnormalities observed/suspected after the ultrasound examination
3. Cases of planned diagnostic ultrasound follow-up exams within 2 weeks for known or suspected abnormality after the current ultrasound examination for the study
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Origin Medical Systems, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jeroen Peter Vanderhoeven, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Providence Swedish Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Harbinder S Brar MD Inc
Apple Valley, California, United States
Harbinder S Brar MD Inc
Indio, California, United States
Harbinder S Brar MD Inc
Murrieta, California, United States
Harbinder S Brar MD Inc
Redlands, California, United States
Harbinder S Brar MD Inc
Riverside, California, United States
Harbinder S Brar MD Inc
San Bernardino, California, United States
Sweet Pea 3D/4D Ultrasound Nola
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Mobile Mama Ultrasound, LLC
Troy, New York, United States
Mid-Carolina OB/GYN
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
The Nest 4D Ultrasound LLC, DBA InFocus Ultrasound DBA Little Peanut 4D Ultrasound
Norman, Oklahoma, United States
The Nest 4D Ultrasound LLC, DBA InFocus Ultrasound DBA Little Peanut 4D Ultrasound
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Tiny Blessings Ultrasound 4D Studio
Owasso, Oklahoma, United States
Tiny Blessings Ultrasound 4D Studio
Skiatook, Oklahoma, United States
Total Womens Care PLLC
Houston, Texas, United States
Reveal Ultrasound, LLC-S
Webster, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet. 1995 Oct 21;346(8982):1085-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91748-9.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10.
Payne RB. Deming's regression analysis in method comparison studies. Ann Clin Biochem. 1985 Jul;22 ( Pt 4):430. doi: 10.1177/000456328502200419. No abstract available.
Committee Opinion No 700: Methods for Estimating the Due Date. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;129(5):e150-e154. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002046.
Ghelich Oghli M, Shabanzadeh A, Moradi S, Sirjani N, Gerami R, Ghaderi P, Sanei Taheri M, Shiri I, Arabi H, Zaidi H. Automatic fetal biometry prediction using a novel deep convolutional network architecture. Phys Med. 2021 Aug;88:127-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.06.020. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
Matthew J, Skelton E, Day TG, Zimmer VA, Gomez A, Wheeler G, Toussaint N, Liu T, Budd S, Lloyd K, Wright R, Deng S, Ghavami N, Sinclair M, Meng Q, Kainz B, Schnabel JA, Rueckert D, Razavi R, Simpson J, Hajnal J. Exploring a new paradigm for the fetal anomaly ultrasound scan: Artificial intelligence in real time. Prenat Diagn. 2022 Jan;42(1):49-59. doi: 10.1002/pd.6059. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
Akkus Z, Cai J, Boonrod A, Zeinoddini A, Weston AD, Philbrick KA, Erickson BJ. A Survey of Deep-Learning Applications in Ultrasound: Artificial Intelligence-Powered Ultrasound for Improving Clinical Workflow. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Sep;16(9 Pt B):1318-1328. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.06.004.
He F, Wang Y, Xiu Y, Zhang Y, Chen L. Artificial Intelligence in Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnosis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 16;8:729978. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.729978. eCollection 2021.
Xiao S, Zhang J, Zhu Y, Zhang Z, Cao H, Xie M, Zhang L. Application and Progress of Artificial Intelligence in Fetal Ultrasound. J Clin Med. 2023 May 5;12(9):3298. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093298.
Siddique J, Lauderdale DS, VanderWeele TJ, Lantos JD. Trends in prenatal ultrasound use in the United States: 1995 to 2006. Med Care. 2009 Nov;47(11):1129-35. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181b58fbf.
Kurjak A, Medjedovic E, Stanojevic M. Use and misuse of ultrasound in obstetrics with reference to developing countries. J Perinat Med. 2022 Oct 28;51(2):240-252. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2022-0438. Print 2023 Feb 23.
Walsh CA, McAuliffe F, Kinsella V, McParland P. Routine obstetric ultrasound services. Ir Med J. 2013 Nov-Dec;106(10):311-3.
Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Bilardo CM, Chalouhi GE, Ghi T, Kagan KO, Lau TK, Papageorghiou AT, Raine-Fenning NJ, Stirnemann J, Suresh S, Tabor A, Timor-Tritsch IE, Toi A, Yeo G. ISUOG practice guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;41(1):102-13. doi: 10.1002/uog.12342. No abstract available.
International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology; Bilardo CM, Chaoui R, Hyett JA, Kagan KO, Karim JN, Papageorghiou AT, Poon LC, Salomon LJ, Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of 11-14-week ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jan;61(1):127-143. doi: 10.1002/uog.26106. No abstract available.
AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance of Standard Diagnostic Obstetric Ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med. 2024 Jun;43(6):E20-E32. doi: 10.1002/jum.16406. Epub 2024 Jan 15. No abstract available.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs; Goal 3) and the United Nations Global Strategy for Women's, Children's, and Adolescents' Health targeting reduction in the global maternal mortality ratio.
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs; Goal 3) and the United Nations Global Strategy for Women's, Children's, and Adolescents' Health targeting reduction in the global maternal mortality ratio.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
03/13/2025
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
OMS-US-EA-FDA-CPA-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.