Study Comparing Two Image Acquisition Modalities for Second-trimester Pregnancy Screening Ultrasound (Echo-IA)

NCT ID: NCT07286591

Last Updated: 2025-12-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-12-21

Study Completion Date

2026-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The second-trimester morphology ultrasound is a key examination in obstetric monitoring that aims to assess fetal growth, identify any structural abnormalities, and inspect anexes such as placenta, umbilical cord, cervix,...

Several studies suggest that a significant proportion of fetal malformations can be detected during this time frame if a complete morphological analysis is performed. However, the reliability of the screening depends on the quality of the equipment, the operator's level of expertise, and adherence to protocols that define the necessary scans.

In France, since the first reports of the National Technical Committee on Prenatal Screening Ultrasound (2005), particular attention has been paid to standardizing practices. More recently, the French National Conference on Obstetric and Fetal Ultrasound (CNEOF) published new recommendations (2022, revised in 2023) including the development of reference silhouettes for the second-trimester examination, proposing 26 views (22 required and 4 additional). However, the CNEOF does not formalize quality criteria for evaluating the conformity of these images; this task has been taken over by the French College of Fetal Ultrasound (CFEF), which has established a scoring and validation grid for each fetal slice (see CFEF 2022 document).

In parallel, artificial intelligence (AI) is gradually becoming established as a decision support and automation tool in medical imaging, particularly in ultrasound. Deep learning algorithms are capable of identifying anatomical structures, positioning measurement markers, and selecting the most optimal slice, reducing inter-operator variability and streamlining workflow. In the field of obstetric ultrasound, some companies have launched systems capable of detecting or annotating fetal structures in real time, potentially improving diagnostic reliability and reproducibility. Samsung has developed a system called Live View Assist, available on its latest generation ultrasound scanners, which uses AI to automatically recognize and freeze the required fetal slices in real time.

The tool also offers automated validation: if the detected slice conforms to the expected standards, it is directly checked off on a checklist. This innovation promises time savings, a reduced risk of missing certain complex slices, and improved standardization.

However, there is little data, particularly in France, regarding to the actual performance of this tool in a routine screening context. Before considering the integration of Live View Assist and AI into daily practice, it is therefore essential to evaluate the quality of the images it acquires, the feasibility of a complete examination assisted by AI, as well as the potential impact on examination time and improvement of the workload for sonographers.

The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the quality of the 20 mandatory images automatically validated by Live View Assist is not inferior to that of the 20 mandatory images acquired and validated manually by an ultrasound technician, according to the CFEF quality criteria based on the silhouettes recommended by the CNEOF.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Artifical Intelligence Echography Ultrasound

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard ultrasound

Manual acquisition: acquisition of the 22 mandatory images and, if possible, the 4 additional images by the sonographer, respecting the standardized procedure derived from the CNEOF recommendations.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard Ultrasound

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard US with a sonographer

Artificial intelligence-assisted ultrasound

AI-assisted acquisition: using the Live View Assist system to automatically capture the 20 mandatory views in real time, with validation and recording of images as soon as the algorithm detects an image conforming to the reference, and if possible the 2 complementary images.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

US with AI

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

US with Live View Assist

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Standard Ultrasound

Standard US with a sonographer

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

US with AI

US with Live View Assist

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women aged 18 or over,
* With a single, viable pregnancy, definitively dated by first-trimester ultrasound, with no known malformations,
* Scheduled for a routine second-trimester screening ultrasound, i.e., between 20 weeks + 0 days and 24 weeks + 6 days,
* Having given their informed consent,
* Affiliated with the social security system or a beneficiary of such a plan.

Exclusion Criteria

* Multiple pregnancy,
* Known fetal malformation,
* Pathological pregnancy,
* Cognitive impairment, or a disorder causing difficulty understanding instructions or answering questionnaires,
* Patient under legal guardianship,
* Patient not covered by health insurance,
* Protected patient: adult under guardianship, curatorship, or other legal protection, deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Clinique Rive Gauche

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinique Rive Gauche

Toulouse, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jean-Pierre Perrigaud

Role: CONTACT

0033561773333

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Joseph Bouyou, Dr

Role: primary

+33561773366

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Echo-IA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id