Flipped Classroom vs. Flip-Jigsaw in Theoretical Physiotherapy Education

NCT ID: NCT06950918

Last Updated: 2025-04-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

86 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-10

Study Completion Date

2025-07-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Study Summary:

This quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test study aims to compare the effects of Flipped Classroom (FC) and Flip-Jigsaw instructional models on theoretical knowledge acquisition, academic motivation, and class engagement among 86 third-year physiotherapy undergraduates enrolled in a theory-based public health course.

Primary Questions:

How does the hybrid Flip-Jigsaw model impact learning and motivation outcomes compared to FC alone?

Do FC and Flip-Jigsaw differ in enhancing theoretical knowledge, motivation, and participation?

Comparison: Researchers will compare the FC group (pre-class videos + in-class discussions) with the Flip-Jigsaw group (video-based pre-learning + structured peer teaching) to evaluate differences in outcomes.

Participant Tasks:

Attend lectures and complete pre-/post-knowledge tests.

Engage in practical sessions (FC: group discussions; Flip-Jigsaw: peer-led jigsaw activities).

Complete motivation surveys and participation assessments.

Significance: Addresses the gap in understanding Flip-Jigsaw's efficacy in physiotherapy education, despite prior reports on FC and Jigsaw's individual benefits.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Educational Technology Educational Interventions Students Undergraduate Health Professional Students

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Flipped Clasroom Group

Pre-class: Asynchronous video lectures covering theoretical content (e.g., public health principles, manual therapy techniques) were provided via an online platform. Students were required to review materials before in-person sessions. In-class: Instructor-led interactive discussions, case analyses, and problem-solving activities focused on applying theoretical knowledge. No peer-teaching components were included. Structure: Emphasis on self-paced learning followed by collaborative, instructor-guided reinforcement.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental

Intervention Type OTHER

This study is a quasi-experimental parallel group design comparing Flipped Classroom (FC) and Flip-Jigsaw models in a theoretically-oriented public health course. Both groups used the same pre-prepared video lectures to standardize content, but differentiated in-class strategies: The FC group used instructor-led discussions, while the Flip-Jigsaw group used Jigsaw technique and peer teaching (students learning subtopics in "expert groups" and teaching them in "master groups"). Unlike traditional FC, this hybrid model includes systematic peer collaboration and role-based accountability mechanisms. Theoretical knowledge acquisition, motivation and engagement outcomes were assessed through quantitative tests (pre-post-retention tests) and qualitative interviews, and objectivity was ensured in practical exams with single-blinded assessors. The study brings innovation to the literature as it is the first study to demonstrate the unique effect of Flip-Jigsaw in theoretical courses in the fie

Flipped-Jigsaw Group

Pre-class: The same video lessons as the FC group are delivered only to the students in the expert group in the pre-class content delivery.

In-class: Structured peer-teaching using the Jigsaw technique:

Expert Groups: Students were divided into small groups, each assigned a subtopic (e.g., cervical spine assessment techniques) to master.

Home Groups: Students returned to mixed groups to teach their subtopic to peers, ensuring collective knowledge integration.

Instructor Role: Facilitated discussions and provided feedback but did not lead content delivery.

Structure: Combines self-paced learning with peer-driven, collaborative skill-building.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental

Intervention Type OTHER

This study is a quasi-experimental parallel group design comparing Flipped Classroom (FC) and Flip-Jigsaw models in a theoretically-oriented public health course. Both groups used the same pre-prepared video lectures to standardize content, but differentiated in-class strategies: The FC group used instructor-led discussions, while the Flip-Jigsaw group used Jigsaw technique and peer teaching (students learning subtopics in "expert groups" and teaching them in "master groups"). Unlike traditional FC, this hybrid model includes systematic peer collaboration and role-based accountability mechanisms. Theoretical knowledge acquisition, motivation and engagement outcomes were assessed through quantitative tests (pre-post-retention tests) and qualitative interviews, and objectivity was ensured in practical exams with single-blinded assessors. The study brings innovation to the literature as it is the first study to demonstrate the unique effect of Flip-Jigsaw in theoretical courses in the fie

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Experimental

This study is a quasi-experimental parallel group design comparing Flipped Classroom (FC) and Flip-Jigsaw models in a theoretically-oriented public health course. Both groups used the same pre-prepared video lectures to standardize content, but differentiated in-class strategies: The FC group used instructor-led discussions, while the Flip-Jigsaw group used Jigsaw technique and peer teaching (students learning subtopics in "expert groups" and teaching them in "master groups"). Unlike traditional FC, this hybrid model includes systematic peer collaboration and role-based accountability mechanisms. Theoretical knowledge acquisition, motivation and engagement outcomes were assessed through quantitative tests (pre-post-retention tests) and qualitative interviews, and objectivity was ensured in practical exams with single-blinded assessors. The study brings innovation to the literature as it is the first study to demonstrate the unique effect of Flip-Jigsaw in theoretical courses in the fie

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* To be between the ages of 18-25
* Volunteering to participate in the study
* Taking the course for the first time
* Having access to the Internet
* Compulsory course attendance

Exclusion Criteria

* Being a minor student
* Not being the first undergraduate education
* To have previously attended courses, seminars, webinars, etc. related to public health
* Participation in other pedagogical studies during the same academic term.
* Failure to complete ≥1 assessment (pre-test, post-test, or surveys).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Suleyman Demirel University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Isparta University of Applied Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ziya Yildiz

Dr. PhD (physiotherapy and rehabilitation)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Süleyman Demirel University

Isparta, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ziya Yıldız, Dr

Role: CONTACT

+905075077573

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ferdi Baskurt, Prof

Role: primary

+ 90 (246) 211 1000

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

postdr2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Seating Posture and Its Relation to Pain
NCT06579131 NOT_YET_RECRUITING