Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Acute Moderate Posterior Ischemic Stroke

NCT ID: NCT06931535

Last Updated: 2025-04-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

960 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-04-13

Study Completion Date

2026-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A substantial body of basic and clinical research has demonstrated the protective effects of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) in ischemic stroke. While these clinical studies support the safety of RIC, the neuroprotective benefits of RIC in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients lack robust evidence due to small sample sizes, heterogeneous RIC protocols, and variability in the severity of neurological deficits among study populations. Our recent multicenter randomized clinical trial, the RICAMIS study, investigated the efficacy of RIC in patients with acute moderate ischemic stroke. The results showed that RIC administered within 48 hours of onset significantly improved 90-day neurological outcomes in patients with moderate stroke severity. It is well established that anterior circulation stroke (ACS) and posterior circulation stroke (PCS) differ in multiple aspects, including anatomical structure, collateral circulation, blood supply, clinical manifestations, prognosis, ischemic tolerance time, and treatment response. For instance, compared to the anterior circulation, the posterior circulation has poorer collateral circulation, a higher proportion of stroke etiologies attributed to atherosclerosis, and longer ischemic tolerance time. Consequently, intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular therapy may offer a more extended therapeutic time window for PCS patients. A prespecified subgroup analysis of the RICAMIS study revealed that patients with PCS derived greater benefit from RIC than those with ACS. However, this finding requires further validation through prospective studies, as prior research has never specifically examined the efficacy of RIC in PCS patients.

Based on the above discussion, this study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of RIC in patients with acute moderate PCS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ischemic Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

control

standard stroke care

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

RIC group

remote ischemic conditioning, twice a day, for 10 days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

remote ischemic conditioning

Intervention Type DEVICE

The cuff of the remote ischemic conditioning device was placed on both upper arms (at the same position as blood pressure measurement) and inflated to 200 mmHg. The treatment protocol consisted of 5 cycles of 5-minute inflation followed by 5-minute deflation, performed twice daily. The treatment duration was 8-12 consecutive days.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

remote ischemic conditioning

The cuff of the remote ischemic conditioning device was placed on both upper arms (at the same position as blood pressure measurement) and inflated to 200 mmHg. The treatment protocol consisted of 5 cycles of 5-minute inflation followed by 5-minute deflation, performed twice daily. The treatment duration was 8-12 consecutive days.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥18 years;
* Time from onset to treatment: ≤48 hours;
* Posterior circulation ischemic stroke confirmed by CT or MRI, including patients who have received intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular therapy;
* NIHSS score at randomization: 6-16, with an item 1a (level of consciousness) score of 0-1;
* First-ever stroke or prior stroke without significant residual disability (modified Rankin Scale score ≤1);
* Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage;
* Uncontrolled severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure \>180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure \>110 mmHg despite antihypertensive therapy);
* Subclavian artery stenosis ≥ 50% or subclavian steal syndrome;
* Intracranial tumor, arteriovenous malformation or aneurysm;
* Severe abnormalities in coagulation;
* Any contraindication for remote ischemic adaptation: the upper limb has serious soft tissue injury, fracture or vascular injury, distal upper limb perivascular lesions, etc.;
* Participating in other clinical trials within 3 months;
* Comorbidity with any serious diseases and life expectancy is less than half a year;
* Patients not suitable for this clinical studies considered by researcher;
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hui-Sheng Chen

Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Neurology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command

Shenyang, , China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Hui-Sheng Chen, Ph.D.

Role: primary

+86 13352452086

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Y (2024) 345

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.