Mosaic Mitral Valve: Long-Term Outcomes in Patients Under 65

NCT ID: NCT06917586

Last Updated: 2025-04-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-01

Study Completion Date

2027-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The safety and efficacy of the Mosaic bioprosthetic heart valves for cardiac valve replacement in the aortic position has been well documented throughout the literature. However, few studies assessing structural valve deficiency, patient outcomes and overall product performance in patients under the age of 65 exists for the Mosaic mitral valve bioprosthetic. This study aims to assess valve efficacy, stability, and post operative outcomes in patients who have received the Mosaic mitral valve prothesis at ProMedica Toledo Hospital and were under the age of 65.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background:

Within the U.S., the prevalence of valvular heart disease is estimated at 2.5% with an abrupt increase after the age of 65 years, predominantly due to degenerative etiologies. In patients with significant valve insufficiency or stenosis where repair or reconstruction is not feasible, valve replacement is the most offered solution. The two types of heart valves offered to patients include mechanical or bioprosthetic. The major advantage of bioprosthetic heart valves in comparison to mechanical valves is the lack of post-operative anticoagulant therapy. However, the major disadvantage of bioprosthetic heart valves lie in their reduced durability compared to mechanical valves, with reoperation rates of \~10% at 10 years and up to 30% at 15 years.

The use of porcine bioprosthetic heart valves for cardiac valve replacement first appeared in the late 1960s and have been widely used since due to the avoidance of anticoagulant therapy. One of the major drawbacks associated with bioprosthetic valves is structural valve deterioration (SVD) which can lead to reduced valve durability, necessitating reoperation. The causes of SVD are poorly understood, however, it is thought to result from the accumulation of calcium and lipids on the valve surface. The Medtronic Mosaic mitral bioprosthetic valve is a 3rd-generation, stented porcine heart valve that was originally approved for clinical use in the U.S. in 2000. These valves are treated with a 0.2% glutaraldehyde solution stabilizing the tissue by cross-linking free lysine residues. In addition, the valve is treated with alpha-amino oleic acid (AOATM) which has been shown to mitigate leaflet calcification in animal studies. Long term clinical safety and efficacy of the Mosaic valve in the aortic position is well documented throughout the literature however, few studies exist detailing performance in the mitral position. Moreover, even fewer studies exist detailing overall valve survival in patients under 65 due to the more common recommendation of the use of mechanical valve replacement in this population. The purpose of this study is to examine long-term outcomes in patients who have received the Mosaic mitral valve bioprosthetic and were under the age of 65 at placement.

Significance:

The investigation of the Medtronic mosaic heart valve in the mitral position will allow for a better assessment of product performance and its impact on patient outcomes. Results can inform physicians on the longevity of the product when used in the mitral position allowing for more accurate prediction of replacement time. In addition, the results may provide further information to the safety and efficacy of placement in the mitral position in patients under the age of 65, a population in which mechanical valves are more prevalent.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Valve Disease, Heart Valve Replacement Valve Regurgitation, Mitral Valve Heart Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Mitral Valve Replacement

Patients who have undergone mitral valve replacement at ProMedica Hospital using the mosaic bioprosthesis and were under the age of 65.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Received the Mosaic Mitral Valve Bioprosthetic at ProMedica Toledo Hospital
* Under the age of 65

Exclusion Criteria

* Over the age of 65
* Under the age of 18
* Surgery performed at institutions outside of ProMedica Toledo Hospital
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Michael Moront

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Michael Moront

Doctor Of Medicine

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Moront, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

ProMedica Health System

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

ProMedica Toledo Hospital

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Dawn Muskiewicz, MS

Role: CONTACT

419-291-7517

Leah Stevenson, MS

Role: CONTACT

419-291-3419

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Dawn Muskiewicz, MS

Role: primary

419-291-7517

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ERP-2024-13849

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

IRB# 24-129

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The China Mviv Registry
NCT05925335 UNKNOWN NA