Consensus Statements on Definition, Components and Grading of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications
NCT ID: NCT06916598
Last Updated: 2025-09-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-09-08
2026-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Define postoperative pulmonary complications in a way that makes sense for patients, families, and healthcare providers.
* Rank complications by severity so doctors can focus on the most serious ones first.
* Decide how and when to monitor patients after surgery to catch problems early.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of Prevention of Postoperative Delirum to Reduce Incidence of Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction
NCT03060174
Observational Study of Early Postoperative Deterioration and Complications
NCT06013891
Survey Assessing the Level of Knowledge of Postoperative Delirium in Poland.
NCT04250610
Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications in Major Non-cardiac Surgery: Post-hoc Analysis of the OPHIQUE Multicentre Study
NCT05824260
Study of Depressive Symptoms Predicting Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction
NCT02210312
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To address these limitations, the StEP collaboration conducted a systematic review and Delphi process to refine PPC classifications. However, challenges remain, including the lack of universal definitions, hierarchical ranking of complications, and representation from diverse healthcare settings. Composite outcome measures improve statistical power but may obscure differences in severity and clinical significance among PPC subtypes.
The PrECiSIOn Delphi initiative aims to develop an expert consensus on defining PPCs, grading their severity, and determining standardized monitoring methods. The goal is to create a valid, reliable, and universally accepted patient-centered definition of PPCs that enhances comparability across studies and informs clinical decision-making.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Delphi Panellists
An international panel of 35-40 panellists from Anesthesiology, Surgery or Intensive Care Medicine and including patient representatives, will be invited to this Delphi study. A concerted effort will be made to include panellists from low- and middle-income countries and both sexes.
Delphi study
This Delphi study involves multiple iterative rounds until a stable consensus or dissensus is reached on all the statements.
Patient and Public involvement
Individuals who have either personally experienced PPCs following surgery within the last 5 years or, primary caregivers of such patients will be recruited as patient care representatives.
Structured Interview
Structured interviews will be conducted by members of the steering committee and an independent qualitative research expert. A pilot-tested case vignette along with a Likert scale-based questionnaire, will be employed to gather insights regarding the impact and severity of PPCs. The impact of the individual components of PPCs will be evaluated on a 7-point Global Rate of Change (GRC) scale (from "very much worse" to very much better") to calculate the minimal clinical important difference. Patient care representatives will be engaged in anonymous voting on the questionnaire. PPCs' rankings and key themes synthesised from the interviews will be shared with the panel in the second Delphi round, facilitating the integration of patient perspectives into the consensus process.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Delphi study
This Delphi study involves multiple iterative rounds until a stable consensus or dissensus is reached on all the statements.
Structured Interview
Structured interviews will be conducted by members of the steering committee and an independent qualitative research expert. A pilot-tested case vignette along with a Likert scale-based questionnaire, will be employed to gather insights regarding the impact and severity of PPCs. The impact of the individual components of PPCs will be evaluated on a 7-point Global Rate of Change (GRC) scale (from "very much worse" to very much better") to calculate the minimal clinical important difference. Patient care representatives will be engaged in anonymous voting on the questionnaire. PPCs' rankings and key themes synthesised from the interviews will be shared with the panel in the second Delphi round, facilitating the integration of patient perspectives into the consensus process.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Author of at least three publications (observational studies or randomised controlled trials) using postoperative pulmonary complications as a primary or secondary outcome For patients and public involvement Individuals who have either personally experienced PPCs following surgery within the last 5 years or, primary caregivers of such patients will be recruited as patient care representatives. Proficiency in English is required. To mitigate potential bias, patient care representatives mustn't maintain a professional or advisory relationship with the steering committee or panellists.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Wolverhampton
OTHER
The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust
OTHER_GOV
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Prof. Dr. Marcus J. Schultz
Professor dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marcus Schultz, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
New Cross Hospital
Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Myles PS, Grocott MP, Boney O, Moonesinghe SR; COMPAC-StEP Group. Standardizing end points in perioperative trials: towards a core and extended outcome set. Br J Anaesth. 2016 May;116(5):586-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew066. No abstract available.
Gottlieb M, Caretta-Weyer H, Chan TM, Humphrey-Murto S. Educator's blueprint: A primer on consensus methods in medical education research. AEM Educ Train. 2023 Jul 11;7(4):e10891. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10891. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Abbott TEF, Fowler AJ, Pelosi P, Gama de Abreu M, Moller AM, Canet J, Creagh-Brown B, Mythen M, Gin T, Lalu MM, Futier E, Grocott MP, Schultz MJ, Pearse RM; StEP-COMPAC Group. A systematic review and consensus definitions for standardised end-points in perioperative medicine: pulmonary complications. Br J Anaesth. 2018 May;120(5):1066-1079. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
Jammer I, Wickboldt N, Sander M, Smith A, Schultz MJ, Pelosi P, Leva B, Rhodes A, Hoeft A, Walder B, Chew MS, Pearse RM; European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM); European Society of Anaesthesiology; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Standards for definitions and use of outcome measures for clinical effectiveness research in perioperative medicine: European Perioperative Clinical Outcome (EPCO) definitions: a statement from the ESA-ESICM joint taskforce on perioperative outcome measures. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Feb;32(2):88-105. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000118.
Lusquinhos J, Tavares M, Abelha F. Postoperative Pulmonary Complications and Perioperative Strategies: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2023 May 9;15(5):e38786. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38786. eCollection 2023 May.
Shander A, Fleisher LA, Barie PS, Bigatello LM, Sladen RN, Watson CB. Clinical and economic burden of postoperative pulmonary complications: patient safety summit on definition, risk-reducing interventions, and preventive strategies. Crit Care Med. 2011 Sep;39(9):2163-72. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31821f0522.
Canet J, Sabate S, Mazo V, Gallart L, de Abreu MG, Belda J, Langeron O, Hoeft A, Pelosi P; PERISCOPE group. Development and validation of a score to predict postoperative respiratory failure in a multicentre European cohort: A prospective, observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Jul;32(7):458-70. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000223.
Piccioni F, Langiano N, Bignami E, Guarnieri M, Proto P, D'Andrea R, Mazzoli CA, Riccardi I, Bacuzzi A, Guzzetti L, Rossi I, Scolletta S, Comi D, Benigni A, Pierconti F, Coccia C, Biscari M, Murzilli A, Umari M, Peratoner C, Serra E, Baldinelli F, Accardo R, Diana F, Fasciolo A, Amodio R, Ball L, Greco M, Pelosi P, Della Rocca G; One-Lung Ventilation Investigators Group (Supplementary Appendix S1). One-Lung Ventilation and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Major Lung Resection Surgery. A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2023 Dec;37(12):2561-2571. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.04.029. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
Fernandez-Bustamante A, Frendl G, Sprung J, Kor DJ, Subramaniam B, Martinez Ruiz R, Lee JW, Henderson WG, Moss A, Mehdiratta N, Colwell MM, Bartels K, Kolodzie K, Giquel J, Vidal Melo MF. Postoperative Pulmonary Complications, Early Mortality, and Hospital Stay Following Noncardiothoracic Surgery: A Multicenter Study by the Perioperative Research Network Investigators. JAMA Surg. 2017 Feb 1;152(2):157-166. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4065.
Nasa P, Yurttas T, Battaglini D, Blot S, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Gama de Abreu M, van Meenen DM, Myatra SN, Serpa Neto A, Oppong R, Paulus F, Renukappa S, Schultz MJ, Slutsky AS, Hemmes SNT; PrECiSIOn-group. Consensus on the definition, components, timeframe and grading of composite outcome of postoperative pulmonary complication-protocol for an international mixed-method consensus study (PrECiSIOn). BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 19;15(8):e103888. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103888.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PrECiSIOn
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.