Discharge Recommendations for Older Adults Using Physical Outcome Measure

NCT ID: NCT06903832

Last Updated: 2025-04-30

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: RECRUITING
• Total Enrollment: 60 participants
• Study Classification: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2025-04-01
• Study Completion Date: 2026-09-30

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to explore if the use of Sit to Stand Test and Gait speed Test could assist physiotherapist with discharge planning decisions for older adults who are admitted to an acute hospital.

Detailed Description

Older adults are susceptible to acute illnesses which could predispose them to hospital admissions, with some of the common reasons for admission being infections, exacerbations of chronic conditions, and falls. This higher likelihood of older adults admitted to hospitals can be seen from the statistics from Ministry of Health in 2021 whereby older adults aged 65 years and older constitute up to 287.3 admissions per 1000 resident population, which is the highest among all age groups. In a study exploring the trend of injuries sustained by older adults presented to the Emergency Department of an acute hospital, 85.3% of all injuries sustained by older adults were due to falls. Common physical injuries sustained by older adults after a fall are fractures, bruises, and soft tissue injuries. Functional decline after a fall was also relatively common in older adults. Additionally, it has also been well recognized that hospitalisation may cause older adults to experience deconditioning. Therefore, older adults who are admitted to an acute hospital, especially those who are admitted due to falls or have a history of falls, are generally at high risk of having a change in their functional status. For the older adults with a change in functional status and have been assisted by a caregiver prior to their hospital admission, one of the main aims usually would be to make sure that their caregivers are still competent in caring for them after discharge. However, for older adults whose premorbid physical functional status are relatively independent, it is pertinent to establish if they are still safe to manage their own care after discharge from hospital. Proper discharge planning for this group of older adults is important to make sure that those who are discharge home will not experience functional decline or at increased risk of falls. Older adults who are admitted in an acute hospital are commonly referred to physiotherapists for assessment to determine are ready to return home or if they need further rehabilitation. However, to manage high workload in the acute hospital and space constraints in the wards, these older adults' readiness for home are frequently based on physiotherapists' clinical judgement, which may differ based on their clinical experience. Discharge planning is predominantly based on the comparisons between the older adults' self-reported functional mobility before hospital admission and the level of assistance they require during assessment by inpatient physiotherapists. Without the use objective outcome measures, there may be disagreement by medical team or family members on physiotherapist's recommendations. Furthermore, there is no venue to track the older adult's improvement objectively. STS and GST are two functional outcome measures that are validated to measure different physical aspects of older adults. STS has been shown to be able to assess lower limb strength, balance control and falls risk. This can be seen from the recommended use of STS in the acute setting for the assessment of lower limb strength and physical performance by a Singapore multidisciplinary consensus recommendation on muscle health in older adults by Chew et al. (2021). As for GST, it is reflective of a person's functional mobility whereby a study by Ostir et al., (2015) has demonstrated that GST can be used as a simple and quick screening tool for hospitalised older adults who may require further intervention with their mobility. As these two measures are easy to administer, less time-consuming and do not require much space, they may be suitable outcome measures to facilitate discharge planning. However, there is no literature demonstrating that they have been used to facilitate discharge planning for older adults in acute hospitals. Therefore, the primary aim of this study is to explore if the two outcome measures are useful in facilitating discharge planning for older adults who are admitted to an acute hospital. Our secondary aim is to determine if the discharge recommendations for participants to discharge home are accurate by looking for any change in the basic activity of living (ADL), self-reported fear of falls and activity confidence post-discharge

Conditions

Discharge Planning; Older Adults (65 Years and Older); Acute Hospitalization; OUTCOME MEASURES

Study Design

• Observational Model Type: COHORT
• Study Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Aged 65 years and older
• Able to ambulate without physical assistance with or without walking aids as per premorbid status for at least 5 metres
• Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) of ≤ 5
• Able to follow instructions (Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT) ≥ 5)

Exclusion Criteria

• Admitted for acute orthopaedic or neurological conditions with physical deficits that affect functional mobility
• Requires physical assistance for functional mobility from ≥ 1 person
• Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) of > 5
• AMT < 5 (Lack capacity to consent to study)

• Minimum Eligible Age: 65 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Singapore Institute of Technology

OTHER

Sponsor Role: collaborator

National University Hospital, Singapore

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Locations

National University Hospital, Singapore

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status: RECRUITING

Countries

Singapore

Central Contacts

Hui Ying Koh

Role: CONTACT

hui_ying_koh@nuhs.edu.sg

(65) 67725256

References

Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, Studenski SA. Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 May;54(5):743-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00701.x.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 16696738 (View on PubMed)

Washburn RA, Smith KW, Jette AM, Janney CA. The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): development and evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Feb;46(2):153-62. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90053-4.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 8437031 (View on PubMed)

Powell LE, Myers AM. The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995 Jan;50A(1):M28-34. doi: 10.1093/gerona/50a.1.m28.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 7814786 (View on PubMed)

Soh SLH, Ting HXT, Ho JY, Tan SL, Kayambu G, Koh KCGK, Low LL, Tan CYF. Assessing Falls Efficacy in Seniors: Important Insights in Hospital and Community Settings. J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls. 2025 Mar 1;10(1):48-53. doi: 10.22540/JFSF-10-048. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 40035087 (View on PubMed)

Soh SL, Tan CW, Xu T, Yeh TT, Bte Abdul Rahman F, Soon B, Gleeson N, Lane J. The Balance Recovery Confidence (BRC) Scale. Physiother Theory Pract. 2024 Mar 3;40(3):658-669. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2135420. Epub 2022 Oct 19.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 36259660 (View on PubMed)

Kempen GI, Yardley L, van Haastregt JC, Zijlstra GA, Beyer N, Hauer K, Todd C. The Short FES-I: a shortened version of the falls efficacy scale-international to assess fear of falling. Age Ageing. 2008 Jan;37(1):45-50. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afm157. Epub 2007 Nov 20.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 18032400 (View on PubMed)

Shah S, Muncer S. Sensitivity of Shah, Vanclay and Cooper's modified Barthel Index. Clin Rehabil. 2000 Oct;14(5):551-2. doi: 10.1191/0269215500cr360oa. No abstract available.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 11043883 (View on PubMed)

Hang JA, Francis-Coad J, Naseri C, Jacques A, Waldron N, Purslowe K, Hill AM. Identifying the Association Between Older Adults' Characteristics and Their Health-Related Outcomes in a Transition Care Setting: A Retrospective Audit. Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 28;9:688640. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.688640. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 34307282 (View on PubMed)

Pournajaf S, Pellicciari L, Proietti S, Agostini F, Gabbani D, Goffredo M, Damiani C, Franceschini M. Which items of the modified Barthel Index can predict functional independence at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation? A secondary analysis retrospective cohort study. Int J Rehabil Res. 2023 Sep 1;46(3):230-237. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000584. Epub 2023 Jun 16.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 37334818 (View on PubMed)

Aminalroaya R, Mirzadeh FS, Heidari K, Alizadeh-Khoei M, Sharifi F, Effatpanah M, Angooti-Oshnari L, Fadaee S, Saghebi H, Hormozi S. The Validation Study of Both the Modified Barthel and Barthel Index, and Their Comparison Based on Rasch Analysis in the Hospitalized Acute Stroke Elderly. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2021 Oct;93(3):864-880. doi: 10.1177/0091415020981775. Epub 2020 Dec 18.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 33336587 (View on PubMed)

Ohura T, Hase K, Nakajima Y, Nakayama T. Validity and reliability of a performance evaluation tool based on the modified Barthel Index for stroke patients. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Aug 25;17(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0409-2.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 28841846 (View on PubMed)

Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(8):703-9. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90065-6.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 2760661 (View on PubMed)

Menant JC, Weber F, Lo J, Sturnieks DL, Close JC, Sachdev PS, Brodaty H, Lord SR. Strength measures are better than muscle mass measures in predicting health-related outcomes in older people: time to abandon the term sarcopenia? Osteoporos Int. 2017 Jan;28(1):59-70. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3691-7. Epub 2016 Jul 9.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 27394415 (View on PubMed)

Abdalla PP, Dos Santos Carvalho A, Dos Santos AP, Venturini ACR, Alves TC, Mota J, de Sousa Oliveira A, Ramos NC, Marini JAG, Machado DRL. Cut-off points of knee extension strength allometrically adjusted to identify sarcopenia risk in older adults: A cross-sectional study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020 Jul-Aug;89:104100. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104100. Epub 2020 May 12.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 32470897 (View on PubMed)

Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 11253156 (View on PubMed)

Chen LK, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung TW, Chou MY, Iijima K, Jang HC, Kang L, Kim M, Kim S, Kojima T, Kuzuya M, Lee JSW, Lee SY, Lee WJ, Lee Y, Liang CK, Lim JY, Lim WS, Peng LN, Sugimoto K, Tanaka T, Won CW, Yamada M, Zhang T, Akishita M, Arai H. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Mar;21(3):300-307.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.012. Epub 2020 Feb 4.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 32033882 (View on PubMed)

Rose Berlin Piodena-Aportadera M, Lau S, Chew J, Lim JP, Ismail NH, Ding YY, Lim WS. Calf Circumference Measurement Protocols for Sarcopenia Screening: Differences in Agreement, Convergent Validity and Diagnostic Performance. Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2022 Sep;26(3):215-224. doi: 10.4235/agmr.22.0057. Epub 2022 Aug 29.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 36031936 (View on PubMed)

Cummings SR, Studenski S, Ferrucci L. A diagnosis of dismobility--giving mobility clinical visibility: a Mobility Working Group recommendation. JAMA. 2014 May;311(20):2061-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3033. No abstract available.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 24763978 (View on PubMed)

Peters DM, Fritz SL, Krotish DE. Assessing the reliability and validity of a shorter walk test compared with the 10-Meter Walk Test for measurements of gait speed in healthy, older adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2013 Jan-Mar;36(1):24-30. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0b013e318248e20d.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 22415358 (View on PubMed)

Ostir GV, Berges IM, Ottenbacher KJ, Fisher SR, Barr E, Hebel JR, Guralnik JM. Gait Speed and Dismobility in Older Adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Sep;96(9):1641-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.05.017. Epub 2015 Jun 9.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 26067366 (View on PubMed)

Chew STH, Kayambu G, Lew CCH, Ng TP, Ong F, Tan J, Tan NC, Tham SL. Singapore multidisciplinary consensus recommendations on muscle health in older adults: assessment and multimodal targeted intervention across the continuum of care. BMC Geriatr. 2021 May 17;21(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02240-8.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 34001023 (View on PubMed)

Rydwik E, Bergland A, Forsen L, Frandin K. Investigation into the reliability and validity of the measurement of elderly people's clinical walking speed: a systematic review. Physiother Theory Pract. 2012 Apr;28(3):238-56. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2011.601804. Epub 2011 Sep 19.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 21929322 (View on PubMed)

Kim HJ, Park I, Lee HJ, Lee O. The reliability and validity of gait speed with different walking pace and distances against general health, physical function, and chronic disease in aged adults. J Exerc Nutrition Biochem. 2016 Sep;20(3):46-50. doi: 10.20463/jenb.2016.09.20.3.7. Epub 2016 Sep 30.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 27757387 (View on PubMed)

Goldberg A, Chavis M, Watkins J, Wilson T. The five-times-sit-to-stand test: validity, reliability and detectable change in older females. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2012 Aug;24(4):339-44. doi: 10.1007/BF03325265.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 23238309 (View on PubMed)

Chen Y, Almirall-Sanchez A, Mockler D, Adrion E, Dominguez-Vivero C, Romero-Ortuno R. Hospital-associated deconditioning: Not only physical, but also cognitive. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;37(3):10.1002/gps.5687. doi: 10.1002/gps.5687.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 35142397 (View on PubMed)

Hoogerduijn JG, Buurman BM, Korevaar JC, Grobbee DE, de Rooij SE, Schuurmans MJ. The prediction of functional decline in older hospitalised patients. Age Ageing. 2012 May;41(3):381-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs015. Epub 2012 Feb 28.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 22378613 (View on PubMed)

Loyd C, Markland AD, Zhang Y, Fowler M, Harper S, Wright NC, Carter CS, Buford TW, Smith CH, Kennedy R, Brown CJ. Prevalence of Hospital-Associated Disability in Older Adults: A Meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Apr;21(4):455-461.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.09.015. Epub 2019 Nov 14.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 31734122 (View on PubMed)

Yeo YY, Lee SK, Lim CY, Quek LS, Ooi SB. A review of elderly injuries seen in a Singapore emergency department. Singapore Med J. 2009 Mar;50(3):278-83.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 19352571 (View on PubMed)

Zisberg A, Shadmi E, Gur-Yaish N, Tonkikh O, Sinoff G. Hospital-associated functional decline: the role of hospitalization processes beyond individual risk factors. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Jan;63(1):55-62. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13193.

Reference Type: RESULT

PMID: 25597557 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

2024/3331

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id