Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
212 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-09-30
2012-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Aging and Task-specific Training to Reduce Falls
NCT07094659
Effect of Adaptive Training for Balance Recovery
NCT02126488
Aging and Mixed Perturbation Training to Reduce Falls in Locomotion
NCT03199729
Fall Recovery Training for Older Adults in Continuous Care Facilities
NCT02173015
Reactive Balance Training for Fall Prevention
NCT04205279
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this study, investigators will demonstrate that older adults can significantly reduce their near-term risk of backward balance loss and falls through motor training by repeated exposure to simulated slips interspersed with no-slip trials. Investigators will verify that awareness or observational learning alone cannot substitute for motor training through an awareness-control group. Investigators will then determine the extent to which adaptive improvements are retained over the course of a year. Finally, investigators will verify that although a single slip exposure may yield some retainable effect, this intensity control group will exhibit significantly less favorable long-term effect on the control of center of mass stability, body weight support, balance loss and fall upon slipping than the motor training group with repeated slips. In addition, investigator expect that the intensity-control group will also have a higher self-reported incidence of falls during the 12-month period than the motor training group with multiple slip exposure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Motor training
Repeated perturbation training
One session consisting of 24 slips total interspersed with 16 nonslip trials (1 block of 8 slips, 3 non-slips, 2nd block of 8 slips, 3 non-slips, a mixed block consisting of 8 slips and 10 non-slips). Retest consisting of one slip exposure at either 6 months, 9 months or 12 months.
Intensity control
Minimal perturbation training
One session consisting of a single slip exposure. Retest consisting of one slip exposure at either 6 months, 9 months or 12 months.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Repeated perturbation training
One session consisting of 24 slips total interspersed with 16 nonslip trials (1 block of 8 slips, 3 non-slips, 2nd block of 8 slips, 3 non-slips, a mixed block consisting of 8 slips and 10 non-slips). Retest consisting of one slip exposure at either 6 months, 9 months or 12 months.
Minimal perturbation training
One session consisting of a single slip exposure. Retest consisting of one slip exposure at either 6 months, 9 months or 12 months.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects in the balance-impaired group will specifically include subjects with unilateral or bilateral vestibular disorders and individuals with balance deterioration due to aging.
* Subjects in this group must be able ambulate independently for at least 5 meters and score 48/56 on the Berg Balance Scale, and must have no Central Nervous System disorders beyond vestibular disorders and no central/peripheral motor impairments.
Exclusion Criteria
2. having known history of osteoporosis,
3. having any clinically significant functional impairment related to a specific musculoskeletal, neurological, or cardiopulmonary disease,
4. ultrasound calcaneus bone mineral density T score \< -1 (osteoporosis )
5. Mini-Mental State exam score \< 25 (impaired cognition),
6. timed up-and-go \> 13.5 sec (impaired mobility).
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
NIH
University of Illinois at Chicago
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tanvi Bhatt
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yi-Chung Pai, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Illinois at Chicago
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clinical Gait and Movement Analysis Laboratory
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2001-0821
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.