Long-term Follow up of the Stability 1 Trial

NCT ID: NCT06885372

Last Updated: 2025-03-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

510 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-11-01

Study Completion Date

2027-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

From 2014-2017, across 7 Canadian and 2 European sites, we randomized 618 patients at high-risk of re-injury, to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with or without a lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) and demonstrated that the addition of the LET reduced the risk of instability (RRR=0.38; 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 0.21-0.52; P=0.0001) and graft re-rupture (RRR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.36-0.83; P=0.001). As a result, practice has changed; there has been a large increase in the proportion of orthopaedic surgeons recommending the addition of an LET at the time of ACLR and an increase in the number of patients requesting an LET from their surgeon. There is some weak evidence suggesting that in the longer term, the LET may increase the risk of developing osteoarthritis (OA) in that knee. Knee OA affects over 4.4 million Canadians and the number of younger adults being diagnosed with knee OA is growing and is a primary reason for seeking healthcare in Canada. The impact of OA in Canada is enormous and projected to cost Canada $17.5 billion annually in lost productivity alone by 2031. This study will use imaging and patient-reported Knee Outcomes Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS) to evaluate the incidence of OA at 10-years post ACL reconstruction with and without LET. We will also collect information about overall knee health, patient-reported outcomes, costs associated with knee injury, rehabilitation and disability, clinical failure, functional ability, and sport participation. It is crucial that we understand the risks of developing knee OA associated with the addition of an LET to an ACLR so that surgeons and patients can make informed decisions, not just for their immediate post injury treatment of the failed ligament, but for the potential long-term consequences of that decision.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

LET ACL Reconstruction Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ACL Reconstruction

Standard ACL reconstruction only.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ACL Reconstruction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Anatomic ACL reconstruction using a four-strand autologous hamstring graft. If the diameter of the graft is found to be less than 7.5mm, semitendinosus will be tripled (5 strand graft) providing a greater graft diameter. Femoral tunnels will be drilled using an anteromedial portal technique, with femoral fixation provided by an Endobutton or equivalent. Tibial fixation will be provided by interference screw.

ACL + LET

Anatomic ACL reconstruction following the same procedure as the active comparator group with an added lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis (LET)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis: A 1cm wide x 8cm long strip of iliotibial band is fashioned, leaving the Gerdys tubercle attachment intact. The graft is tunneled under the fibular collateral ligament (FCL) and attached to the femur with a Richards' staple (Smith \& Nephew), just distal to the intermuscular septum, proximal to the femoral insertion of the FCL. Fixation is performed with the knee at 70 degrees flexion, neutral rotation. Minimal tension is applied to the graft. The free end is then looped back onto itself and sutured using the No. 1 vicryl.

ACL Reconstruction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Anatomic ACL reconstruction using a four-strand autologous hamstring graft. If the diameter of the graft is found to be less than 7.5mm, semitendinosus will be tripled (5 strand graft) providing a greater graft diameter. Femoral tunnels will be drilled using an anteromedial portal technique, with femoral fixation provided by an Endobutton or equivalent. Tibial fixation will be provided by interference screw.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis (LET)

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis: A 1cm wide x 8cm long strip of iliotibial band is fashioned, leaving the Gerdys tubercle attachment intact. The graft is tunneled under the fibular collateral ligament (FCL) and attached to the femur with a Richards' staple (Smith \& Nephew), just distal to the intermuscular septum, proximal to the femoral insertion of the FCL. Fixation is performed with the knee at 70 degrees flexion, neutral rotation. Minimal tension is applied to the graft. The free end is then looped back onto itself and sutured using the No. 1 vicryl.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ACL Reconstruction

Anatomic ACL reconstruction using a four-strand autologous hamstring graft. If the diameter of the graft is found to be less than 7.5mm, semitendinosus will be tripled (5 strand graft) providing a greater graft diameter. Femoral tunnels will be drilled using an anteromedial portal technique, with femoral fixation provided by an Endobutton or equivalent. Tibial fixation will be provided by interference screw.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ACL deficient knee
* skeletally mature to 25 years of age
* 2 or more of:

* competitive pivoting sport
* grade 2 pivot shift or greater
* generalized ligament laxity - Beighton score of 4 or greater

Exclusion Criteria

* previous ACL reconstruction on either knee
* multi-ligament injury (two or more ligaments requiring surgical attention)
* symptomatic articular cartilage defect requiring treatment other than debridement
* greater than 3 degrees of asymmetric varus
* unable to complete outcome questionnaires
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Western University, Canada

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Banff Sport Medicine Clinic

Banff, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

University of Calgary

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Fraser Health Authority

New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Pan Am Clinic

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

McMaster University

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Queens University

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust

Coventry, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

104524

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.