Stop Air Leak by Talc or Autologous Blood Patch Therapy

NCT ID: NCT06883188

Last Updated: 2025-03-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-04-01

Study Completion Date

2029-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objectives: To compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety profiles of intrapleural talc pleurodesis versus autologous blood patch therapy(ABPT) in patients with secondary spontaneous pneumothorax(SSP) complicated by persistent air leak(PAL), and to assess the trial feasibility for a subsequent full-scale, multicentre randomised controlled trial(RCT).

Hypothesis: Talc pleurodesis and ABPT demonstrate comparable efficacy in stopping PAL and facilitating chest drain removal within 5 days.

Design and subjects: This single-centre, two-arm, open-label pilot RCT will recruit 30 patients with SSP and PAL persisting ≥5 days. Eligible patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive intrapleural talc pleurodesis or ABPT. Digital chest drain systems will continuously record air leak rates from 24 hours before randomization until 120 hours post-intervention, ensuring objective, real-time data capture. Patients will be followed till 90 days post-discharge.

Interventions: Recruited subjects with PAL ≥5 days will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive talc pleurodesis or ABPT.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome is complete cessation of air leak and successful chest drain removal within 5 days after the intervention. Secondary outcomes include absolute and percentage changes in digitally measured air leak rates, duration of chest drainage, recurrence of ipsilateral pneumothorax, need for additional pleural interventions, and safety outcomes such as drain blockage and pleural infection.

Data analysis and expected results: Data will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis for all randomised subjects with regression models adjusting for confounders. The pilot outcomes will inform sample size calculations and refine design parameters for the proposed full-scale multicentre RCT.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pneumothorax, defined as the presence of air in the pleural space, is a common respiratory emergency that often necessitates prolonged hospitalisation. In cases where pneumothorax occurs in the setting of underlying chronic lung diseases (secondary spontaneous pneumothorax, SSP), the clinical course is considerably more severe. SSP patients are typically more hypoxic, more likely to develop persistent air leak (PAL) (exceeding 5-7 days), and experience longer hospital stays with higher in-patient mortality compared to those with primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP).

The management of SSP with PAL remains controversial despite its clinical significance. Numerous strategies, including chemical pleurodesis, autologous blood patch therapy (ABPT), implantation of endobronchial valves (EBV), and surgical pleurodesis, are employed in practice. However, many SSP patients are unsuitable for invasive procedures such as EBV placement or surgery, owing to their poor premorbid status. In this context, ABPT and chemical pleurodesis (often using talc) emerge as low-cost, bedside alternatives. Yet, current practices vary widely, and a lack of robust comparative evidence has left clinicians with no definitive guidance regarding the optimal management approach.

Talc pleurodesis, involving the intrapleural instillation of sterile talc powder, is a commonly adopted treatment for SSP with PAL. Retrospective studies indicate that 37.2% to 44.5% of SSP patients undergo chemical pleurodesis, with talc being the predominant agent. Reported treatment success is around 70%, with a median drainage duration of 12 days post-procedure. Adverse events, most notably chest pain affecting roughly one-third of patients, are not uncommon, although more serious complications such as respiratory distress occur in only 1.6% of cases. Nonetheless, these findings are derived from studies with retrospective designs and variable methodologies, limiting firm conclusions on efficacy and safety.

In contrast, ABPT has been proposed as a promising alternative for managing PAL. This technique involves the intrapleural instillation of autologous blood with the aim of sealing the air leak, initially developed for PAL in post-operative pneumothorax. Several small-scale retrospective and prospective studies have suggested that ABPT can achieve cessation in 26% to 91% of cases, with some reports showing 71.7% to 84.0% of patients experiencing complete resolution within five days. Moreover, ABPT appears safe for repeated administration, with adverse events reported at incidences ranging from 0% to 16%. However, the heterogeneous outcomes likely reflect differences in blood dosage, timing of intervention, number of administrations, and varying definitions of PAL among studies.

Given the controversy and the limitations of existing evidence, a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing talc pleurodesis with ABPT is imperative. To achieve this, a pilot study is designed to rigorously address methodological weaknesses by standardising the timing of pleural interventions, employing a digital chest drain system for precise, quantitative measurement of air leak, and adopting unified criteria for treatment success.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pneumothorax Spontaneous Secondary

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is a single-centre, two-arm, open-label, randomized controlled trial including patients with spontaneous secondary pneumothorax and persistent air leak. Eligible patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either intrapleural administration of talc or autologous blood patch therapy. The digitalised air leak rate will be monitored continuously from randomisation till the removal of chest drain. Important endpoints include the rate of successful chest drain removal and reduction in air leak within 5 days after intrapleural intervention. This study will follow patients through their hospital stay and outpatient visits at 30 and 90 days after randomisation.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

talc pleurodesis

intrapleural instillation of talc slurry

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

talc powder

Intervention Type DRUG

intrapleural instillation of talc slurry

Autolougs blood patch therapy (ABPT)

intrapleural instillation of patient's venous blood

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

patient's own venous blood

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

intrapleural instillation of patient's own venous blood

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

talc powder

intrapleural instillation of talc slurry

Intervention Type DRUG

patient's own venous blood

intrapleural instillation of patient's own venous blood

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 years or older
* Radiographically proven pneumothorax and underlying lung disease (either pre-existing or shown in diagnostic imaging at presentation)
* Spontaneous onset of pneumothorax, not related to trauma or iatrogenic procedure
* SSP with air leak persists for ≥3 days after the first radiographic evidence of pneumothorax
* Intend to administer talc or autologous blood patch therapy (ABPT) to stop the air leak as the next step of treatment

Exclusion Criteria

* A chest drain size smaller than Fr 12
* Bilateral pneumothorax
* Impaired blood clotting, including baseline INR \> 1.5, platelet \< 150 x 10\^9/L, use of therapeutic dose anticoagulant or dual-antiplatelet agents
* Active or recent (within 6 weeks) pleural infection
* Septicaemia or active extrapleural infection (e.g. pneumonia)
* Use of long-term systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressant
* Previously received talc or ABPT to the ipsilateral pleural space for the current episode of pneumothorax
* Known sensitivity to talc
* Has had a previous pneumonectomy (either on the same or contralateral side)
* Patients who are pregnant or lactating (females of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test before randomisation)
* Expected survival of less than three months from a different pathology to this pneumothorax (e.g. metastatic malignancy)
* Cognitively impaired and physically unable to follow the turning procedure during intrapleural procedure, or at risk of self-removing chest drain
* Inability to give informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chinese University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ka Pang Chan

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David SC Hui, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ka Pang Chan, MBChB

Role: CONTACT

+852 3505 2211

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STOP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.