The 5-in-2 Ankle Block for Outpatient Foot Surgery: the FIT Block Study
NCT ID: NCT06882109
Last Updated: 2025-03-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
80 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-03-31
2025-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Popliteal sciatic nerve block is widely used but at risk of falling due to prolonged motor blockade and foot drop. Ankle block is recognized as a good regional anesthesia technique but requires five skin punctures.
FIT block might be a good alternative, aiming to provide an optimal anesthetic block, good postoperative analgesia without motor blockade (calf muscles) and necessitating only two skin punctures.
The purpose of this study is to describe the technique and the efficacy and safety of the FIT block for outpatient foot surgery
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Plantar Compartment Block in Hallux Valgus Ambulatory Surgery
NCT03815422
Plantar Compartment Block Versus Sciatic Block in Hallux Valgus Ambulatory Surgery
NCT03922412
High Ankle Block Versus Regional Block for Acute Pain Control After Ankle Surgery
NCT03894098
Lidocaine Versus Bupivacaine in Ambulatory Continuous Block With Elastomeric Pump
NCT02121119
Compare Continuous Gastrocnemius Plane Block With Intravenous Analgesia After Foot and Ankle Surgery
NCT05463809
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The ankle blocks are well described and provide similar anesthetic quality and surgical comfort than the popliteal sciatic nerve block. However, it has been reported that successful surgical anesthesia with ankle block was not reached in 14% to 16% of patients scheduled for hallux valgus surgery. Interestingly, these distal blocks preserve extrinsic motor function of the foot, enabling the patient to ambulate while minimizing the risk of falling.
Distal blocks using repeated punctures close to the periostum are painful during the RA performance. Sensitivity is greater at limbs extremities, as evidenced by Penfield's homonculus and the size of the brain surface devoted to extremities. As a result, it is frequently necessary to sedate the patient during the regional anesthesia procedure. The position of the ankle tourniquet may also require sedation if the surgery is to be prolonged.
For foot surgery under ankle blocks, it is necessary to anesthetize all distal branches of the sciatic nerve, i.e. the superficial and deep fibular nerves, the tibial nerve and the sural nerve. The saphenous nerve, coming from the lumbar plexus, is anesthetized with an ankle skin infiltration.
In the classical approaches, the tibial nerve is blocked at the medial aspect of the ankle, in the medial retro-malleolar region, posterior to tibial vessels. The sural nerve is blocked superficially in the lateral retro-malleolar region, between the calcaneal tendon and the lateral malleolus. The deep fibular nerve is located on the anterior surface of the instep, next to the periosteum, particularly painful when encountered by the needle. The superficial fibular nerve is located on the anterolateral aspect of the leg, where it is already divided into its two distal branches. Sometimes not visualized on ultrasound, these branches can be blocked by subcutaneous infiltration. This presents a risk of failure due to the anatomical variability of their emergence, explaining the risk of sensory blockade failure, as well as a theoretical risk of accidental injury during infiltration.
Optimized ultrasound guided approach for the FIT Block will be used, based on optimal nerve anatomical locations. A one puncture proximal approach for the fibular nerves is used, while maintaining the benefit of preserved extrinsic motricity. Another one puncture approaches the sural nerve laterally, after the block of the tibial nerve during the same puncture and then the subcutaneous infiltration of the saphenous nerve. An anatomical proof of concept study has been done before the exploratory clinical study.
These approaches permit a surgical anesthetic block for foot surgery using 2 punctures (instead of 5) with a single patient's body position, compatible with sedation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Five-in-two ankle block
The FIT block is a new approach for regional anesthetic block of the ankle. We use an optimized ultrasound guided approach for the FIT Block, based on optimal nerve anatomical locations. A one puncture proximal approach for the fibular nerves is used, while maintaining the benefit of preserved extrinsic motricity. Another one puncture approaches the sural nerve laterally, after the block of the tibial nerve during the same puncture and then the subcutaneous infiltration of the saphenous nerve. An anatomical proof of concept study has been done before the exploratory clinical study.
These approaches permit a surgical anesthetic block for foot surgery using 2 punctures (instead of 5) with a single patient's body position, compatible with sedation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for outpatient foot surgery and undergoing a FIT-block as regional anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
* Peripheral neuropathy or chronic pain syndrome
* Infection or injury at the needle entry points
* Allergy or contraindications to study drugs
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding woman
* Inability to participate in pain scoring scales
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Montpellier
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
CAPDEVILA Xavier
(MD, PhD) Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lucas Deffontis, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Montpellier
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CER-2024-XC01
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IORG0010765
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.