Antegrade Dissection and Re-entry Versus Retrograde Strategy in CTO PCI

NCT ID: NCT06878729

Last Updated: 2026-01-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

74 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-07-28

Study Completion Date

2028-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The ADRENALINE trial has been designed as a multi-center, prospective randomized study to compare the procedural and periprocedural outcomes of coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using antegrade dissection and re-entry (ADR) versus retrograde strategy. Beyond the patient-oriented outcomes, the influence of the studied CTO PCI strategies on the stress levels among interventional cardiologists will be explored.

The main questions it aims to answer are as follows:

* What is the difference between ADR versus retrograde strategy with regard to total procedure time, the rates of successful guidewire crossing and periprocedural complications as well as stress levels experienced by interventional cardiologists?
* Is retrograde approach associated with higher rates of myocardial injury/infarction based on cardiac troponin/cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as compared with ADR?

Participants will undergo pre- and postprocedural laboratory testing (cardiac troponin, CK-MB), CMR for late gadolinium enhancement and health status assessment. Subjects undergoing successful CTO PCI using antegrade wiring strategy will be included in the observational arm.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The ADRENALINE trial is planned as a multicenter, prospective randomized research experiment in patients with clinical indication for PCI of CTO. The target population will comprise patients with at least difficult CTO (J-CTO score ≥2) and angiographic equipoise for either ADR or the retrograde CTO recanalization strategy as evaluated by 2 independent CTO PCI operators. The pre-procedural assessment will comprise cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for late gadolinium enhancement, laboratory testing (cardiac troponin, creatine kinase-MB) and health status assessed by the Seattle angina questionnaire (SAQ) and the Rose Dyspnea Scale. Subsequently patients with either failed or unattempted primary antegrade wiring strategy will be evenly randomized (1:1 fashion) to either ADR or the retrograde CTO crossing strategy (n=74), while subjects undergoing successful antegrade wiring will be included in the observational arm (n=47). After CTO PCI, the cardiac troponin and creatine kinase-MB will be measured at 12 hours intervals (at least up to 24 hours), while CMR with late gadolinium enhancement will be repeated within 5 days post-procedure (including the observational arm). The health status of the study participants (SAQ and the Rose Dyspnea Scale) will be re-assessed at 3-months post-CTO PCI. In addition, to investigate the effect of the studied CTO PCI strategies on the occupational hazard of interventional cardiologists, the physical and mental stress levels experienced by CTO operators will be continuously monitored during the procedure. The co-primary endpoint is defined as: 1) total procedure time and 2) successful guidewire crossing through CTO. The secondary endpoints include: time of successful guidewire crossing through CTO, final technical success of CTO PCI, radiation dose, contrast volume, equipment cost, procedural complications, rate of periprocedural myocardial injury, rate of new myocardial infarction on CMR, quality of life, target lesion failure (cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization) at 3 months follow-up, and stress indices experienced by physicians during the procedure.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease Coronary Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients will be randomized to either ADR or retrograde CTO crossing strategy in a 1:1 fashion.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ADR strategy

Patients with either failed or unattempted primary antegrade wiring strategy will be evenly randomized (1:1 fashion) to either ADR or retrograde CTO crossing strategy. The ADR, as part of the antegrade approach, involves extraplaque crossing of the occluded coronary artery with subsequent reentry into the distal true lumen using dedicated reentry systems or knuckle wire techniques.

Group Type OTHER

CTO PCI using ADR strategy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

CTO recanalization using ADR performed as primary or secondary CTO PCI strategy (i.e. in case of unattempted or failed antegrade wiring, respectively).

Retrograde strategy

Patients with either failed or unattempted primary antegrade wiring strategy will be evenly randomized (1:1 fashion) to either ADR or retrograde CTO crossing strategy. The retrograde technique, planned as the comparator to the ADR strategy, relies on crossing the occluded coronary artery from the distal vessel (i.e. against the original direction of blood flow). Retrograde CTO crossing is attempted either with retrograde intraplaque wiring or more frequently using the retrograde dissection and reentry techniques.

Group Type OTHER

CTO PCI using retrograde strategy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

CTO recanalization using retrograde approach performed as primary or secondary CTO PCI strategy (i.e. in case of unattempted or failed antegrade wiring, respectively).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CTO PCI using ADR strategy

CTO recanalization using ADR performed as primary or secondary CTO PCI strategy (i.e. in case of unattempted or failed antegrade wiring, respectively).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

CTO PCI using retrograde strategy

CTO recanalization using retrograde approach performed as primary or secondary CTO PCI strategy (i.e. in case of unattempted or failed antegrade wiring, respectively).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* clinical indication for CTO PCI as determined by the local heart team (presence of angina or equivalent symptoms and/or documented ischemia or viability)
* at least difficult native CTO lesion with J-CTO difficulty score ≥2 points on invasive angiography
* angiographic suitability for both ADR and the retrograde strategy as assessed by 2 independent hybrid CTO PCI operators
* informed consent for participation in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* \<18 years of age
* acute myocardial infarction
* cardiogenic shock
* severe valvular disease
* estimated life expectancy \<1 year
* contraindication to PCI
* contrast allergy
* positive pregnancy test or breast-feeding
* native CTO lesion with easy or intermediate difficulty score on invasive angiography (J-CTO score \<2 points)
* lack of angiographic equipoise between the ADR and the retrograde strategy as assessed by 2 independent hybrid CTO PCI operators
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical Research Agency, Poland

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maksymilian Opolski

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Institute of Cardiology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Institute of Cardiology

Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

Site Status RECRUITING

1st Military Clinical Hospital

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status RECRUITING

Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Poland

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Katarzyna Istynowicz

Role: CONTACT

0048223434268

Wioletta Antos

Role: CONTACT

0048223434268

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Maksymilian Opolski

Role: primary

Grzegorz Sobieszek

Role: primary

004881261183666

Jakub Drozd

Role: primary

0048817284626

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024/ABM/01/00006

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2024/ABM/01/00006

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Drug-eluting Balloon in Acute Myocardial Infarction
NCT00856765 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
Resistance STEMI Study
NCT03439150 TERMINATED NA