Fast Radial Pharmaco-invasive Strategy In ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Trial
NCT ID: NCT04300582
Last Updated: 2020-03-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-12-13
2021-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the 24-hour hemoglobin drop (acute anemia) between the fast pharmaco-invasive strategy (within 3 hours) and the standard pharmaco-invasive strategy (3 to 24 hours) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by coronary occlusion treated in Sancta Maggiore hospitals in São Paulo and underwent to cardiac catheterization through the forearm vessels.
METHOD: A prospective, randomized, multicenter study will be conducted in which 120 subjects will be randomly divided for fast and standard cardiac catheterization (1: 1). Stent implantation in the culprit vessel will be performed. The primary objective is to assess whether the fast cardiac catheterization is non-inferior to the standard strategy for a hemoglobin (Hb) drop within 24 hours. Considering in the control group an average drop of Hb 0.6 ± 1g / dl and that a drop greater than 3 g/dL of Hb is related to unfavorable clinical outcome, using a two-tailed alpha of 0.05 and a power of 90% to test the non-inferiority of the fast strategy with respect to standard strategy, each group will require 60 patients, totaling 120 individuals to include. However, if Hb fall in the fast strategy is greater than 3 g/dL and this result does not reproduce in the standard strategy, the study will allow us to show the superiority of the standard approach (between 3 and 24 hours).
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The following data will be collected: gender, age, ST-segment elevation location on the electrocardiogram (ECG), symptoms duration, time from first evaluation to ECG (door-to-ECG), time from first evaluation until thrombolytic administration (door-to-needle), thrombolytic used, medications administered at the origin unit, time between the end of thrombolytic and the beginning of cardiac catheterization, type of procedure (diagnosis and / or intervention), date and time of procedure, access site, radiation dose, contrast volume, associated comorbidities, laboratory, weight, height, BMI, coronary artery disease pattern (Syntax Score), vessel culprit for AMI, type and size of stent used, successful intervention, coronary flow at the end of the procedure (TIMI), angioplasty technique, residual coronary artery disease approach, bleeding (BARC), major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE), any cause and cardiovascular death. The hemoglobin of the patient's admission to the Interventional Cardiology Department and its variation after 24 hours will be evaluated. If red blood cell transfusion is required, pre-transfusion hemoglobin will be considered for evaluation.
Data from each patient will be registered in the REDCap platform in a electronic case report form (CRF) and will be submitted to statistical analysis using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 24 program. The REDCap has some important characteristics such as role-based authentication and security; real-time data validation and integrity checking; data assignment and audit capability; storage and sharing of protocols; central storage and backup of data and data export in formats compatible with known analysis programs as Excel, SPSS, Statistical Analysis System (SAS), Stata, R software, among others. Data will be audited by an independent team from Prevent Senior's Institute of Education and Research.
Patients who have the following characteristics will not be included in this trial: contraindications to fibrinolytic therapy, such as active internal bleeding, clinical signs of acute aortic dissection, traumatic or prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (\> 10 minutes), head trauma in the last four weeks, history of intracranial neoplasia, ischemic stroke in the past year or previous haemorrhagic stroke, pregnancy, sustained severe hypertension (≥180 mmHg systolic pressure and / or ≥110 mmHg diastolic pressure), trauma or major surgery in the last four weeks, use of oral anticoagulants, history of liver or kidney failure; did not meet reperfusion criteria upon arrival at the Interventional Cardiology Service of the Sancta Maggiore Hospital Itaim Unit (no improvement in chest pain or reduction in ST-segment elevation below 50% after thrombolytic administration); having femoral access as the first choice for invasive stratification; bleeding complications prior to cardiac catheterization, such as important hematoma and stroke; acute pulmonary edema (dyspnea of cardiac etiology with increased respiratory effort, hypoxemia and / or desaturation); cardiogenic shock (systolic blood pressure below 90 mmHg associated with signs of tissue hypoperfusion, such as oliguria, altered level of consciousness, cyanosis, cold and wet extremities, or vasopressor drug use); do not accept to sign the consent form.
Patients will be studied according to the precepts of the Helsinki Declaration and the Nuremberg Code, respecting the Research Norms Involving Human Beings (National Health Council resolution: 466/12) of the National Health Council. The study will be explained to patients when they are admitted to the Interventional Cardiology Department of the Sancta Maggiore Itaim Hospital and will be required to sign the Informed Consent Form (ICF) before any invasive procedure is performed. Randomization will be performed through a specific site after signing the consent form. The project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Prevent Senior Research Institute.
To perform the sample calculation, the study of Bertrand OF et al (2010) was used to evaluate the variation of hemoglobin (Hb) in 24 hours after coronary angioplasty by radial approach. The control group had a mean hemoglobin drop of 0.6 ± 1g / dL and there were worse outcomes in patients with a hemoglobin drop greater than 3g / dL. (22) Therefore, considering in the control group a mean Hb fall of 0.6 ± 1g / dl and a fall greater than 3 g/dL of Hb is related to an unfavorable clinical outcome, using a two-tailed alpha of 0.05 and a power of 90% to test the non-inferiority of the fast strategy over the standard strategy, each group will require 60 patients, totaling 120 individuals to be included. However, if the Hb drop in the fast strategy is greater than 3 g/dL and this result does not reproduce in the standard strategy, the study will allow us to show the superiority of the strategy between 3 and 24 hours.
An intention-to-treat assessment will be performed. Categorical variables will be presented as absolute numbers and percentages. Continuous variables will be presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range) according to their distribution. The distribution evaluation of continuous variables will be tested with Shapiro-Wilk. For continuous variables, the Student's t-test (normal distribution) or Wilcoxon-rank (non-normal distribution) will be used according to their distribution. For categorical variables the Chi-square test will be used.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard pharmaco-invasive strategy
Cardiac catheterization 3 to 24 hours after thrombolytic completion in STEMI patients.
Cardiac catheterization standard strategy
Cardiac catheterization by forearm approach 3 to 24 hours after thrombolytic completion in STEMI patients
Fast pharmaco-invasive strategy
Cardiac catheterization less than 3 hours after thrombolytic completion in STEMI patients.
Cardiac catheterization fast strategy
Cardiac catheterization by forearm approach within 3 hours after thrombolytic completion in STEMI patients
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cardiac catheterization standard strategy
Cardiac catheterization by forearm approach 3 to 24 hours after thrombolytic completion in STEMI patients
Cardiac catheterization fast strategy
Cardiac catheterization by forearm approach within 3 hours after thrombolytic completion in STEMI patients
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Submitted to thrombolysis
* Interventional Cardiology Department arrival less than 3 hours after the end of thrombolytic
Exclusion Criteria
* No reperfusion criteria when arriving at the Interventional Cardiology Department: no improvement in chest pain or reduction in ST-segment elevation below 50% after thrombolytic administration
* Femoral approach as the first choice for invasive stratification
* Bleeding complications before cardiac catheterization such as important hematoma and stroke
* Acute pulmonary edema: dyspnea of cardiac etiology with increased respiratory effort, hypoxemia and / or desaturation
* Cardiogenic shock: systolic blood pressure below 90 mmHg associated with signs of tissue hypoperfusion, such as oliguria, altered level of consciousness, cyanosis, cold and wet extremities, or vasopressor drug use
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bruno Faillace, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sancta Maggiore Hospital
São Paulo, , Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Carlos Campos, MD, PhD
Role: primary
Rodrigo Esper, MD, PhD
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id