Conventional vs. Distal Radial Access Outcomes in STEMI Patients Treated by PCI
NCT ID: NCT06013813
Last Updated: 2023-11-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
2922 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-09-07
2025-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
• Mayor adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days in STEMI patients treated by PCI are not inferior when comparing the distal radial approach versus the conventional radial approach ?
Participants will:
* sign the informed consent to enroll in the clinical trial.
* will agree to be treated by PCI
* will be randomized 1:1 to perform PCI by conventional radial or distal radial approach.
If there is a comparison group:
Researchers will compare conventional radial access vs distal radial access to see if the distal approach is not inferior compared to the conventional radial access in order to offer less or equal MACE and a similar rate of a successful procedure.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Trial Comparing Radial and Femoral Approach in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
NCT01136187
Arterial Access for Coronary Intervention in Myocardial Infarction
NCT00356044
RadIal Versus Femoral InvEstigation in ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome
NCT01420614
Distal Radial Access for Primary PCI in STEMI Patients to Prevent RAO
NCT05461781
Remote Ischemic Conditioning in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction as Adjuvant to Primary Angioplasty
NCT02313961
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Distal radial approach
* Clean and dry the puncture site.
* Simple lidocaine 2% is infiltrated.
* The artery is punctured in the radial distal zone, and a 6 Fr hydrophilic radial introducer is placed with the Seldinger technique.
* Verapamil 2.5 mg and Heparin 5000 IU are administered.
* PCI is performed.
* Finally, the introducer is withdrawn with the patent hemostasis technique, and a radial compression device is placed (prelude mostly or terumo).
Radial Artery approach on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
* Randomized patients with a right patent radial artery.
* The outcomes of the distal radial approach will be compared with those of the conventional radial approach.
* Technique and devices (introducer and compression devices) are the same in both approaches.
Conventional radial approach (proximal radial approach).
* Clean and dry the puncture site.
* Simple lidocaine 2% is infiltrated.
* The artery is punctured in the radial proximal zone, and a 6 Fr hydrophilic radial introducer is placed with the Seldinger technique.
* Verapamil 2.5 mg and Heparin 5000 IU are administered.
* PCI is performed.
* Finally, the introducer is withdrawn with the patent hemostasis technique, and a radial compression device is placed (terumo).
Radial Artery approach on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
* Randomized patients with a right patent radial artery.
* The outcomes of the distal radial approach will be compared with those of the conventional radial approach.
* Technique and devices (introducer and compression devices) are the same in both approaches.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Radial Artery approach on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
* Randomized patients with a right patent radial artery.
* The outcomes of the distal radial approach will be compared with those of the conventional radial approach.
* Technique and devices (introducer and compression devices) are the same in both approaches.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patent radial access (distal and conventional)
* Patients who agree to participate in the study and sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
* Absence of palpable radial pulse.
* Arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis.
* Previous radial artery occlusion.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Guering Eid Lidt
Director of Cardiac Catheterization Lab
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Guering Eid Lidt, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Guering Eid-Lidt
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez
Mexico City, , Mexico
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mason PJ, Shah B, Tamis-Holland JE, Bittl JA, Cohen MG, Safirstein J, Drachman DE, Valle JA, Rhodes D, Gilchrist IC; American Heart Association Interventional Cardiovascular Care Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; and Council on Genomic and Precision Medicine. An Update on Radial Artery Access and Best Practices for Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep;11(9):e000035. doi: 10.1161/HCV.0000000000000035.
Mamas MA, Anderson SG, Carr M, Ratib K, Buchan I, Sirker A, Fraser DG, Hildick-Smith D, de Belder M, Ludman PF, Nolan J; British Cardiovascular Intervention Society; National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research. Baseline bleeding risk and arterial access site practice in relation to procedural outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Oct 14;64(15):1554-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.05.075.
Ferrante G, Rao SV, Juni P, Da Costa BR, Reimers B, Condorelli G, Anzuini A, Jolly SS, Bertrand OF, Krucoff MW, Windecker S, Valgimigli M. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Interventions Across the Entire Spectrum of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul 25;9(14):1419-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabro P, Frigoli E, Leonardi S, Zaro T, Rubartelli P, Briguori C, Ando G, Repetto A, Limbruno U, Cortese B, Sganzerla P, Lupi A, Galli M, Colangelo S, Ierna S, Ausiello A, Presbitero P, Sardella G, Varbella F, Esposito G, Santarelli A, Tresoldi S, Nazzaro M, Zingarelli A, de Cesare N, Rigattieri S, Tosi P, Palmieri C, Brugaletta S, Rao SV, Heg D, Rothenbuhler M, Vranckx P, Juni P; MATRIX Investigators. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2465-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, Gibson CM, Caixeta A, Eikelboom J, Kaul S, Wiviott SD, Menon V, Nikolsky E, Serebruany V, Valgimigli M, Vranckx P, Taggart D, Sabik JF, Cutlip DE, Krucoff MW, Ohman EM, Steg PG, White H. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011 Jun 14;123(23):2736-47. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009449. No abstract available.
Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemela K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, Budaj A, Niemela M, Valentin V, Lewis BS, Avezum A, Steg PG, Rao SV, Gao P, Afzal R, Joyner CD, Chrolavicius S, Mehta SR; RIVAL trial group. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011 Apr 23;377(9775):1409-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
Mehta SR, Jolly SS, Cairns J, Niemela K, Rao SV, Cheema AN, Steg PG, Cantor WJ, Dzavik V, Budaj A, Rokoss M, Valentin V, Gao P, Yusuf S; RIVAL Investigators. Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 18;60(24):2490-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.050. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
Ferrante G, Condello F, Rao SV, Maurina M, Jolly S, Stefanini GG, Reimers B, Condorelli G, Lefevre T, Pancholy SB, Bertrand O, Valgimigli M. Distal vs Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and/or Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Nov 28;15(22):2297-2311. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.09.006.
Eid-Lidt G, Rivera Rodriguez A, Jimenez Castellanos J, Farjat Pasos JI, Estrada Lopez KE, Gaspar J. Distal Radial Artery Approach to Prevent Radial Artery Occlusion Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 22;14(4):378-385. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.013.
Bernat I, Aminian A, Pancholy S, Mamas M, Gaudino M, Nolan J, Gilchrist IC, Saito S, Hahalis GN, Ziakas A, Louvard Y, Montalescot G, Sgueglia GA, van Leeuwen MAH, Babunashvili AM, Valgimigli M, Rao SV, Bertrand OF; RAO International Group. Best Practices for the Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Diagnostic Angiography and Intervention: An International Consensus Paper. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 25;12(22):2235-2246. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.07.043.
Eid-Lidt G, Reyes-Carrera J, Farjat-Pasos JI, Saenz AL, Bravo CA, Rangel SN, Salido DZ, Vega Servin NS, Soto-Lopez ME, Gaspar J. Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion of 3 Hemostatic Methods in Transradial Intervention for Coronary Angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 May 23;15(10):1022-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.03.011.
Aminian A, Sgueglia GA, Wiemer M, Kefer J, Gasparini GL, Ruzsa Z, van Leeuwen MAH, Ungureanu C, Leibundgut G, Vandeloo B, Kedev S, Bernat I, Ratib K, Iglesias JF, Al Hage E, Posteraro GA, Pascut D, Maes F, Regazzoli D, Kakonyi K, Meijers TA, Colletti G, Krivoshei L, Lochy S, Zafirovska B, Horak D, Nolan J, Degrauwe S, Tobita K, Saito S. Distal Versus Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: The DISCO RADIAL Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jun 27;15(12):1191-1201. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.04.032. Epub 2022 May 17.
Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Falk V, Head SJ, Juni P, Kastrati A, Koller A, Kristensen SD, Niebauer J, Richter DJ, Seferovic PM, Sibbing D, Stefanini GG, Windecker S, Yadav R, Zembala MO; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394. No abstract available.
Writing Committee Members; Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, Bates ER, Beckie TM, Bischoff JM, Bittl JA, Cohen MG, DiMaio JM, Don CW, Fremes SE, Gaudino MF, Goldberger ZD, Grant MC, Jaswal JB, Kurlansky PA, Mehran R, Metkus TS Jr, Nnacheta LC, Rao SV, Sellke FW, Sharma G, Yong CM, Zwischenberger BA. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jan 18;79(2):e21-e129. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.006. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
23-1367
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.