A Trial of Trans-radial Versus Trans-femoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Access Site Approach in Patients With Unstable Angina or Myocardial Infarction Managed With an Invasive Strategy

NCT ID: NCT01014273

Last Updated: 2011-04-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

7021 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-06-30

Study Completion Date

2011-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a multi-national, multi-centre, randomized study comparing the trans-radial PCI access strategy and the trans-femoral PCI access strategy in ACS patients with UA or NSTEMI or STEMI planned to be treated with an invasive strategy (PCI).

The hypothesis is that radial access site PCI will be associated with significantly less major bleeding and access site complications compared with a femoral approach, without increasing the risk of ischemic events. The overall benefit-risk profile will favor a trans-radial approach.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Coronary Syndrome Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Trans-femoral access

Femoral artery PCI access site

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Trans-radial access

Radial artery PCI access site

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1.1 UA/NSTEMI patients

Ischemic symptoms suspected to represent a non-ST segment elevation ACS (unstable angina \[UA\] or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction NSTEMI) defined as:

Clinical history consistent with new onset, or a worsening pattern, of characteristic ischemic chest pain occurring at rest or with minimal exercise (lasting longer than 10 minutes) and planned to be managed with an invasive strategy

AND at least one of the following:

1. Electrocardiogram (ECG) changes compatible with new ischemia \[ST depression of at least 1mm or transient ST elevation or ST elevation of less than or equal to 1 mm or T wave inversion greater than 2 mm in at least 2 contiguous leads\].

or
2. Patients \> 60 years of age with normal ECG are eligible provided there is a high degree of certainty that presenting symptoms are due to myocardial ischemia. Such patients must have documented evidence of previous coronary artery disease (CAD) with at least one of the following:

* Prior MI requiring hospitalization
* Prior revascularization procedure (more than 3 months ago)
* Cardiac catheterization showing significant CAD
* Positive exercise test
* Other objective evidence of atherosclerotic vascular disease or
3. Already elevated cardiac enzymes or troponin I or T above the upper limit of normal.

1.2 STEMI patients

1. Presenting with signs or symptoms of acute myocardial infarction lasting at least 20 minutes and planned to be managed with an invasive strategy with intent to perform a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the index hospitalization.
2. Definite ECG changes compatible with STEMI: persistent ST-elevation (\> 2 mm in two contiguous precordial leads or \> 1 mm in at least two limb leads), or new left bundle branch block, or Q-wave in 2 contiguous leads

2\) Randomized during index hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome 3) Suitable candidate for either radial or femoral artery PCI 4) Intent to perform same-sitting angiography and PCI. 5) Palpable radial artery with documented normal Allen's test 6) Acceptance by operator to use whichever route is assigned by the randomization process 7) Previous experience of the operator with at least 50 cases of radial artery access within the past year 8) Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Age \< 18 years
2. Active bleeding or significant increased risk of bleeding, severe hepatic insufficiency, current peptic ulceration, proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
3. Uncontrolled hypertension
4. Cardiogenic shock
5. Prior CABG surgery with use of more than one internal mammary artery
6. Documented severe peripheral vascular disease precluding a femoral approach
7. Participation in any study with an investigational drug or device within the previous 30 days
8. Medical, geographic or social factors making study participation impractical
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sanofi

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Population Health Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Population Health Research Institute

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sanjit Jolly, MD, MSc, FRCPC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Population Health Research Institute

Susan Chrolavicius

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Population Health Research Institute

Shamir Mehta, MD, MSc, FRCP(C), FACC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Population Health Research Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hamilton Health Sciences

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cantor WJ, Mehta SR, Yuan F, Dzavik V, Worthley M, Niemela K, Valentin V, Fung A, Cheema AN, Widimsky P, Natarajan M, Jedrzejowski B, Jolly SS. Radial versus femoral access for elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing coronary angiography and intervention: insights from the RIVAL trial. Am Heart J. 2015 Nov;170(5):880-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.08.011. Epub 2015 Aug 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26542495 (View on PubMed)

Jolly SS, Cairns J, Yusuf S, Niemela K, Steg PG, Worthley M, Ferrari E, Cantor WJ, Fung A, Valettas N, Rokoss M, Olivecrona GK, Widimsky P, Cheema AN, Gao P, Mehta SR; RIVAL Investigators. Procedural volume and outcomes with radial or femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Mar 18;63(10):954-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.052. Epub 2013 Nov 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24269362 (View on PubMed)

Jolly SS, Cairns J, Niemela K, Steg PG, Natarajan MK, Cheema AN, Rao SV, Cantor WJ, Dzavik V, Budaj A, Sheth T, Valentin V, Fung A, Widimsky P, Ferrari E, Gao P, Jedrzejowski B, Mehta SR; RIVAL Investigators. Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVAL trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Mar;6(3):258-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.016.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23517837 (View on PubMed)

Mehta SR, Jolly SS, Cairns J, Niemela K, Rao SV, Cheema AN, Steg PG, Cantor WJ, Dzavik V, Budaj A, Rokoss M, Valentin V, Gao P, Yusuf S; RIVAL Investigators. Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 18;60(24):2490-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.050. Epub 2012 Oct 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23103036 (View on PubMed)

Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemela K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, Budaj A, Niemela M, Valentin V, Lewis BS, Avezum A, Steg PG, Rao SV, Gao P, Afzal R, Joyner CD, Chrolavicius S, Mehta SR; RIVAL trial group. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011 Apr 23;377(9775):1409-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2. Epub 2011 Apr 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21470671 (View on PubMed)

Jolly SS, Niemela K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, Budaj A, Valentin V, Lewis BS, Avezum A, Steg PG, Rao SV, Cairns J, Chrolavicius S, Yusuf S, Mehta SR. Design and rationale of the radial versus femoral access for coronary intervention (RIVAL) trial: a randomized comparison of radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J. 2011 Feb;161(2):254-260.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.11.021.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21315206 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Rad-Fem PCI Access Study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

SAFE-PCI for Women
NCT01406236 TERMINATED NA