A Trial of Trans-radial Versus Trans-femoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Access Site Approach in Patients With Unstable Angina or Myocardial Infarction Managed With an Invasive Strategy
NCT ID: NCT01014273
Last Updated: 2011-04-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
7021 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-06-30
2011-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The hypothesis is that radial access site PCI will be associated with significantly less major bleeding and access site complications compared with a femoral approach, without increasing the risk of ischemic events. The overall benefit-risk profile will favor a trans-radial approach.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Conventional vs. Distal Radial Access Outcomes in STEMI Patients Treated by PCI
NCT06013813
Distal Radial Access for Primary PCI in STEMI Patients to Prevent RAO
NCT05461781
Trial Comparing Radial and Femoral Approach in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
NCT01136187
RadIal Versus Femoral InvEstigation in ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome
NCT01420614
Femoral Versus Radial Access for Primary PCI
NCT01398254
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Trans-femoral access
Femoral artery PCI access site
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Trans-radial access
Radial artery PCI access site
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Ischemic symptoms suspected to represent a non-ST segment elevation ACS (unstable angina \[UA\] or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction NSTEMI) defined as:
Clinical history consistent with new onset, or a worsening pattern, of characteristic ischemic chest pain occurring at rest or with minimal exercise (lasting longer than 10 minutes) and planned to be managed with an invasive strategy
AND at least one of the following:
1. Electrocardiogram (ECG) changes compatible with new ischemia \[ST depression of at least 1mm or transient ST elevation or ST elevation of less than or equal to 1 mm or T wave inversion greater than 2 mm in at least 2 contiguous leads\].
or
2. Patients \> 60 years of age with normal ECG are eligible provided there is a high degree of certainty that presenting symptoms are due to myocardial ischemia. Such patients must have documented evidence of previous coronary artery disease (CAD) with at least one of the following:
* Prior MI requiring hospitalization
* Prior revascularization procedure (more than 3 months ago)
* Cardiac catheterization showing significant CAD
* Positive exercise test
* Other objective evidence of atherosclerotic vascular disease or
3. Already elevated cardiac enzymes or troponin I or T above the upper limit of normal.
1.2 STEMI patients
1. Presenting with signs or symptoms of acute myocardial infarction lasting at least 20 minutes and planned to be managed with an invasive strategy with intent to perform a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the index hospitalization.
2. Definite ECG changes compatible with STEMI: persistent ST-elevation (\> 2 mm in two contiguous precordial leads or \> 1 mm in at least two limb leads), or new left bundle branch block, or Q-wave in 2 contiguous leads
2\) Randomized during index hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome 3) Suitable candidate for either radial or femoral artery PCI 4) Intent to perform same-sitting angiography and PCI. 5) Palpable radial artery with documented normal Allen's test 6) Acceptance by operator to use whichever route is assigned by the randomization process 7) Previous experience of the operator with at least 50 cases of radial artery access within the past year 8) Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Active bleeding or significant increased risk of bleeding, severe hepatic insufficiency, current peptic ulceration, proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
3. Uncontrolled hypertension
4. Cardiogenic shock
5. Prior CABG surgery with use of more than one internal mammary artery
6. Documented severe peripheral vascular disease precluding a femoral approach
7. Participation in any study with an investigational drug or device within the previous 30 days
8. Medical, geographic or social factors making study participation impractical
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sanofi
INDUSTRY
Population Health Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Population Health Research Institute
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sanjit Jolly, MD, MSc, FRCPC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Population Health Research Institute
Susan Chrolavicius
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Population Health Research Institute
Shamir Mehta, MD, MSc, FRCP(C), FACC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Population Health Research Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hamilton Health Sciences
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cantor WJ, Mehta SR, Yuan F, Dzavik V, Worthley M, Niemela K, Valentin V, Fung A, Cheema AN, Widimsky P, Natarajan M, Jedrzejowski B, Jolly SS. Radial versus femoral access for elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing coronary angiography and intervention: insights from the RIVAL trial. Am Heart J. 2015 Nov;170(5):880-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.08.011. Epub 2015 Aug 16.
Jolly SS, Cairns J, Yusuf S, Niemela K, Steg PG, Worthley M, Ferrari E, Cantor WJ, Fung A, Valettas N, Rokoss M, Olivecrona GK, Widimsky P, Cheema AN, Gao P, Mehta SR; RIVAL Investigators. Procedural volume and outcomes with radial or femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Mar 18;63(10):954-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.052. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
Jolly SS, Cairns J, Niemela K, Steg PG, Natarajan MK, Cheema AN, Rao SV, Cantor WJ, Dzavik V, Budaj A, Sheth T, Valentin V, Fung A, Widimsky P, Ferrari E, Gao P, Jedrzejowski B, Mehta SR; RIVAL Investigators. Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVAL trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Mar;6(3):258-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.016.
Mehta SR, Jolly SS, Cairns J, Niemela K, Rao SV, Cheema AN, Steg PG, Cantor WJ, Dzavik V, Budaj A, Rokoss M, Valentin V, Gao P, Yusuf S; RIVAL Investigators. Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 18;60(24):2490-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.050. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemela K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, Budaj A, Niemela M, Valentin V, Lewis BS, Avezum A, Steg PG, Rao SV, Gao P, Afzal R, Joyner CD, Chrolavicius S, Mehta SR; RIVAL trial group. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011 Apr 23;377(9775):1409-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
Jolly SS, Niemela K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, Budaj A, Valentin V, Lewis BS, Avezum A, Steg PG, Rao SV, Cairns J, Chrolavicius S, Yusuf S, Mehta SR. Design and rationale of the radial versus femoral access for coronary intervention (RIVAL) trial: a randomized comparison of radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J. 2011 Feb;161(2):254-260.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.11.021.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Rad-Fem PCI Access Study
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.